• Comment (28)

Veterans Group Promises More Anti-Obama Ads

May 3, 2012 RSS Feed Print

In 2012 expect to see a lot more bite from Veterans for a Strong America, the group that bashed President Obama for politicizing the anniversary of the Osama bin Laden raid. [Photo gallery: One Year After Osama bin Laden's Death.]

"We'll be making sure we have a robust discussion about the nation's security," says Joel Arends, the Chairman of Veterans for a Strong America. "What you are going to see is what we highlighted in our most recent ad."

The group is gaining momentum across the country with more than 10,000 followers, some of whom are Navy SEALs reportedly frustrated with Obama's handling of the bin Laden raid anniversary.

The nonprofit's supporters plan to lobby against mandatory Pentagon budget cuts as well as what they believe are Obama's national security shortcomings. [Video: Osama Bin Laden Death Anniversary Prompts Terror Warnings.]

Veterans for a Strong America has a list of grievances against the president, but Arends says most recently he was floored by Obama's public announcement regarding the withdrawal of troops from Afghanistan.

"He tells the Taliban exactly how long they have to wait it out," says Arends, an Army infantry officer who deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan. "We are very concerned with negotiating with the Taliban. They're an enemy that has sworn the destruction of the United States of America."

The president's lack of interaction with the military is another complaint Veterans for a Strong America intends to voice.

"Well look," Arends says. "I think this administration has had a tenuous relationship with the military. Certainly this president does not appear with the military as much as his predecessor."

Arends argues White House programs like Joining Forces don't make up for the president's absence.

"At the end of the day, White House photo ops are not going to solve national security issues nor will they effectively deal with the issues veterans are dealing with when they come back home," he says.

Arends, a veteran and former campaign operative for George W. Bush and John McCain, earned a reputation as a soldier spokesman in 2006 as an executive director for Vets for Freedom, a PAC that lobbied for the surge in both Afghanistan and Iraq.

During the 2008 presidential race, the group controlled a multi-million dollar ad campaign that called into question Obama's commitment to the troops. The group also supported both GOP and Democratic veterans running for Congress.

Arends says his nonprofit isn't planning to endorse anyone, but admits presumptive GOP nominee Mitt Romney has solid footing when it comes to foreign policy.

"We are encouraged by the policy stances he has made in wanting to see defense spending rise," Arends says. "We are also enthused by Romney's wanting to adopt Paul Ryan's budget, which would do away with sequestration."

Tags:
veterans,
Barack Obama

Reader Comments Read all comments (28)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

If the veterans are against Obama. How can I be against Obama. Who would Jesus be for. The humans that endorse war or the ones that do not endorse war.

Jonathan of CA 12:54PM May 14, 2012

picture means a thousand words. during the approaching decision to strike osama bin laden, this usurper was cowarding fixed at the gold course instead stand as commander-in-chief giving directives. someone can draw a poster showing him swinging his club and a picture showing the SEALS getting their order from panetta and sec of state making this final decison. make these two pictures in one setting. all decision in actions were prompt by his advisers, not this coward. any wonder when crisis comes, he is not around.

tangshuichun of CA 12:54PM May 12, 2012

Ann Keenan of MI,

Question:

The links you have listed....

http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/doemoff/govinfo/federal/gov_ushist.html

http://www.loc.gov/rr/program/bib/ourdocs/Constitution.html

http://library.columbia.edu/indiv/lehman/guides/intell.html

http://www.archives.gov/

http://www.loc.gov/teachers/classroommaterials/lessons/

http://www.archives.gov/frc/

http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/

....were written by "people w/o opinion"???

By and large, people naturally slant according to the environment best suited to their personal needs, IE:

1) Any scribed material from a government agency where it's reports were written by a worker who was granted or has maintained employment through the Labor Union, which Mr. Obama favors, would be "slanted".

2) On the whole, any higher academic facility (U.C. Berkley, University of Maryland = left-slanted) that are already reputed a left or right standing will also print biased material.

3) ....and the Media??? Ho, boy!

One can only utilize common sense (...which appears to prevail as the least common entity in this country!).

Recently, I viewed a televised segment of an on-the-street media reporter who was asking the young (high school-college aged) generation, "Who was Adolph Hitler?" ....well over 50% said they didn't know!!!

Jesus God in Heaven.......!

Sarah Rikenbauker of GA 10:59AM May 07, 2012

About this blog

About this blog

Washington Whispers has been featured in U.S. News & World Report since 1933, offering a fun, insider's view of Washington.

advertisement

Latest Videos

advertisement