• Comment (63)

Obama's Super, Super PAC

March 12, 2012 RSS Feed Print

The uncharted waters of Super PACs just became a bit murkier.

President Barack Obama's Priorities USA Action, along with the Democratic Senate's Super PAC, Majority PAC, and the Democratic House Majority PAC are combining to form the country's first-ever joint fundraising Super PAC — Unity 2012. [See the latest political cartoons.]

An FEC official told Whispers that there aren't any regulations prohibiting this kind of fundraising, but confirmed this is unprecedented; it's the first time any Super PAC has tried to form a committee of this magnitude.

FEC reports show that for the 2012 elections, the three Democratic committees have raised $10 million in total, but that's chump change compared to Romney's Super PAC, Restore Our Future, which has raised nearly $37 million so far. [Jack Abramoff Proposes Reforms for Corrupt Lobbying.]

"This joint effort is basically a convenience for donors who are looking to participate in more than one progressive organization," says Bill Burton, senior strategist for Priorities USA Action.

Anthony Corrado, a campaign finance expert at the Brookings Instituition says the new fundraising model mirrors the PAC strategy Democrats used in 2004, which helped consolidate the efforts of otherwise competing progressive groups.

"You can envision a situation where given a limited number of Democratic checks. This way Democrats can go to these donors with a unified front," Corrado says. "This is a way they can approve their efficiency and effectiveness of their fundraising. This is a way they can hold joint events."

Craig Holman, a campaign finance expert at Public Citizen, a group committed to government transparency, says it is likely the Democratic Super PACs are uniting in hopes that they will bolster their chances against GOP Super PACs that have significantly outraised them.

"It is certainly an interesting experiment," Holman says. "It is being touted as one-stop shopping for voters who want to support Democrats generally, but it seems to be born out of the weakness of the individual Democratic PACs."

Holman says joint fundraising committees are ubiquitous within traditional PACs that have contribution limits, but with the Citizens United ruling, Super PACs face no restrictions in fundraising, making this kind of joint committee fundraising repetitive.

"This may help fundraising for the Democratic party, but I don't see it becoming a common feature for the other group," Holman says. "Technically, there are no other big advantages. They can already raise unlimited money."

FEC rules require joint committees to clearly state how funds will be dispersed between various Super PACs, but so far Unity 2012 has not made that information available.

Tags:
Barack Obama

Reader Comments Read all comments (63)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

A DEMOCRATIC COMMERCIAL

Street scene- with a table and three pictures covered .

A spokesman stops people and asks if they would care to identify several characters from movies.

1. Uncover Mr. Potter they respond 'that's the mean banker in It's A Wonderful life'

2. Uncover Ted Knight playing the old rich jerk from Caddie Shack

3. Uncover the Sheriff of Nottingham-'he over taxed the poor to benefit his rich friends.'

The spokesman asks 'what do they all have in common?'

The couple respond-rich powerful and mean spirited?

or

Yes and they all are Republicans.

The spokesman looks at the camera and smiles and says; 'they get it.'

COMMERCIAL #2

Same scene only this time the pictures are

1. Teddy Roosevelt--he was the president who broke up the monopolies

2. Dwight Eisenhower- he's the president who warned against the military being to powerful.

3. Richard Nixon-he brought us the EPA to protect our environment.

What do they all have in common?

They were all Republicans who could not get elected as a republican today.

Please PRODUCE AND rUN THIS....

jim nolan of NC 12:49PM June 19, 2012

Hello Andrew of Ak, President Obama stood for three things in 2008... growing government, peace, and freedom.

By 2012, Barack Obama is still standing tall on his agenda to centralize more American governence in Washington DC.

Does anyone think he's still for peace and/or freedom?

Why not think "small Constitutional government, peace and freedom"?...... AND have it stick!

The Ron Paul revolution welcomes dems.. dems often think with compassionate [and passionate] heart, yet whom shall be mindful of those paying the bill?

Good sense was had by all.

Dr. Ron Paul, for America

John of NY 10:51AM March 15, 2012

Obama doing good job for america

andrew of AK 1:22AM March 15, 2012

About this blog

About this blog

Washington Whispers has been featured in U.S. News & World Report since 1933, offering a fun, insider's view of Washington.

advertisement

Latest Videos

advertisement