• Comment (3)

Critics Mock Romney's Iowa 'Win'

January 4, 2012 RSS Feed Print

Winning Iowa isn't good enough for GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney, according to his top foes.

While Romney won last night with 30,015 votes, eight more than second-place Rick Santorum, critics are suggesting that he is the least attractive GOP candidate since Bob Dole ran in 1996. "The biggest story is Romney's 'win'--after spending millions and four years in Iowa, he didn't move the needle," said an associate of Newt Gingrich.

Another campaign rapped Romney for failing to get a higher percentage than he has in national polls for a year, 25 percent. President Obama's aide David Axelrod added of Romney, "He's still the 25 percent man."

[Mitt Romney Ekes Out a Win in Iowa.]

Republican campaign surrogates put out figures to hit the front-runner. To bolster their candidate, fans of Gingrich noted that he did pretty much as well as Sen. John McCain four years ago. "Newt finished fourth with 16,251 votes, which was 13.3 percent of the vote. In 2008, McCain finished fourth with 15,536 votes, which was 13.0 percent of the vote," said one.

Other campaigns said that Romney received a percentage similar to his total four years ago. "This time, he got 30,015 votes, which was 24.6 percent of the vote. In 2008, he got 30,021 votes or 25.2 percent of the vote," said a competing campaign. What's more, Romney's winning percentage was called the lowest in decades. "In contrast to the Iowa caucuses of 1980, 1988, 1996, 2000, and 2008, this was the lowest winning percentage. Prior to this, Dole in 1996 had the lowest winning percentage, 26.7 percent."

[See the latest political cartoons.]

Team Romney shrugged the attacks off, happy to have a win and headed into a major victory in New Hampshire next week where he still holds a massive polling edge over opponents.

A Suffolk University/7News two-day tracking poll of likely voters in New Hampshire's GOP presidential primary released today had Romney maintaining his lead with 43 percent of the vote, followed by Ron Paul at 14 percent, Gingrich at 9 percent, Jon Huntsman at 7 percent, and Rick Santorum at 6 percent.

Tags:
David Axelrod,
Rick Santorum,
Republican Party,
2012 presidential election,
Mitt Romney

Reader Comments Read all comments (3)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Santorum success in Iowa can be explained as another flavor of the moment. First it was Bachmann, then Perry, then Herman Cain, then Ron Paul. When the music stopped, it was Romney sitting in the chair despite the fact that Santorum was the flavor of the moment.

The constant, however, is Romney. No matter how the pundits spin it. Reese Bobby said it best in 'Talladega Nights,' "If you aint first, your last."

Romney expended very little effort in Iowa, and yet he walked away with the win. Not bad for three days of campaigning. He has New Hampshire locked down tight. His momentum will carry him through South Carolina with hardly a bump. The rest is history. Bachmann, Cain, Perry, Huntsman supporters will mostly fall Romney's way.

Paul is so far right he is now left. His supporters are true, few, and as nutty. He'll muster a whimper . . . but that's about it.

Meanwhile we will have Newt's constant flatulence to remind us he's still in the room. He will announce his exit in Florida.

Santorum, nice guy. He's premature in thinking that now is his time. He hasn't paid the "dues" to the establishement, power brokers, handlers, movers and shakers, and pundits. This is qualified by his number of endorcements. Few.weak and anemic endorsements he's acquired. His "work harder not smarter" strategy may local or state elections, but his strategy will fail moving foreward. He doesn't have the organization, financial support, or electorate passion to make-up the difference and win the nomination let alone the general election. Furthermore, he's forced into playing the part of ultra-conservative candidate. He's the new Huckabee. Anyone with any sand knows that independent and moderates voters will fall to the polar left candidate long before they fall for the polar right candidate. Hense the final question primary voters should ask themselves: "Which guy can best beat Obama?" The answer is resounding . . . Romney.

david of ID 6:17PM January 04, 2012

PJ Fusco On The News said it best, they called Rick Santorum, "The Conservative Gentleman For President." There's a lot of truth in that and the statement, "If Mitt Romney wants to call an eight vote difference winning, then he’s living in the same dream world as Ron Paul, but without Paul’s fanatic followers." Conservatives wanted their anti-Romney, and now we have him. Anything can happen to be sure, but Santorum makes the most sense in a field filled with people who have enough political and personal baggage "to sink a supertanker." The Obama people may dig up some garbage to throw at him, but not in the tremendous quantities they've prepared for Romney and Gingrich. Simply put, juxtapose Santorum with Obama and the contrast is precisely what the voting public wants to see, an American patriot versus a Socialist traitor.

Daniel Manzi of NY 3:07PM January 04, 2012

Ron Paul vs the Chicken Hawks (Santorum, Romney, Gingrich). Too chicken to serve in the military and too much warmongering. Troops and vets like me can't stand Chicken Hawks for Commander In Chief (like Obama and Clinton).

Vet4RonPaul of PA 2:09PM January 04, 2012

About this blog

About this blog

Washington Whispers has been featured in U.S. News & World Report since 1933, offering a fun, insider's view of Washington.

advertisement

Latest Videos

advertisement