• Comment (13)

Media Sexism Doomed Hillary's 2008 Bid

December 23, 2011 RSS Feed Print

It turns out that former 2008 Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton's campaign was right: She was doomed by media sexists. Two new scholarly studies that blow the whistle on the industry's lopsided reliance on male reporters find that the media first belittled her effort against Barack Obama, then jumped the gun to push her out of the race earlier than any other recent strong primary challenger.

Among the key findings is that sexism, more than ideology, drove the media's anti-Clinton theme. The biggest offender: MSNBC's liberal and popular host Chris Matthews. "He treated HRC [Hillary Rodham Clinton] worse than all other newspeople," says one study from University of Utah researchers and published in the prestigious Political Research Quarterly. A related study from the same school found that sexism played a role in the media's push to get Clinton out of the 2008 Democratic primaries even though she was a strong challenger who vowed to stay in until the convention in Denver.

[10 Commentators the Left and Right Love to Hate.]

While examples of sexism were shrugged off at the time, the new study of media sex bias charges that the press used many tricks to swipe at Clinton, the initial front-runner. Some included nasty name-calling. Others were more subtle, like referring to her simply as "Hillary." Some 8 percent of the time, the leading 127 newspeople studied by the scholars called her "Hillary." It was "Barack" just 2 percent of the time. And it wasn't because she marketed her campaign as "Hillary," they add.

The study notes that when men use their first name in their campaign, reporters still refer to them by their last names: Rudy Giuliani was "Giuliani," and Lamar Alexander was "Alexander." Here again, Matthews was tops, calling the candidate "Hillary" twice as often as his nearest TV news competitor, Fox's Sean Hannity, did. [Michele Bachmann's Nuttiness Is No Reason for Sexism.]

The authors say sexism in the media is so bad—men in the survey outnumbered women 60 percent to 40 percent—that owners should start hiring and promoting more women.

Clinton didn't fare any better in the second study, also published in Political Research Quarterly. It found that the media, often using unnamed sources, went overboard very early in the primaries to suggest that Clinton quit the race.

The "exit talk" was far worse than any other recent primary challenger has faced, including Ronald Reagan in 1976, Edward Kennedy in 1980, and Gary Hart in 1984. "Some might suggest sexism was at work," say the authors, who add that reporters having more leeway to speak their own opinions was also to blame.

Tags:
Chris Matthews,
Hillary Clinton

Reader Comments Read all comments (13)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Let it be known that I am no fan of Hillary Clinton. I noticed at the time of the 08 primaries that the media, as well as much of the Dem party, exhibited sexism toward Hillary. Undoubtedly, this was because she was a very viable and qualified candidate, and the media and Dem's wanted Obama (you can guess the reason why). It was despicable what was done to her. I was a Dem up to that point and now I call myself an Independent. I will be voting Rep this time around just as I did 4 years ago. Romney is hands down more qualified for the job. I live in Mass and know firsthand that Romney delivers. I hope everyone votes for him. As I said, I know his capabilities first hand. Also, just look up the astounding job he did in saving the Winter Olympics. That example in and of itself will show you the amazing team of people he can pull together to get the job done, and get it done with great results.

JackRussell of MA 12:33PM October 04, 2012

Because of this media bias women and women's groups should actively seek to reduce corporate media's influence. You do this by teaching people how to cut the cable cord and watch only the shows they actually want on the internet. When you subscribe to even basic cable you subsidize MSNBC and other sexist content even though you don't want it or watch it. Women can save a lot of money, still get their non sexist shows and stop subsidizing media sexism by cutting the cable cord.

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/homegarden/2015989068_compute25.html

Bes of WA 11:02AM January 25, 2012

This is real sad, because people do not think about how this affects young women in America who have their cranial system jutted to full gear.

I was voted Most Popular in high school, I love people. I am outgoing, I'll ask you about your sick grandma you told me about, I know what foods you like: I am that girl. I have had a normal life as a girl, I am best friends with my father, and actually, my mother left me when younger, so it is extremely easy for me to have and hold long term friendships with boys to men in my life, and extremely hard to hold friendshops with women. And I'll just say it: Guys like me. All assumptions you can make from that statement are likely true in my relation with men in life. I have many girlfriends I have connected with in life, mostly highly intelligent women from community colleges to ivy leaguers. Prominent artists to WNBA stars. I find myself as an accurate representative of the career women. I do not discriminate against other choices, I am a feminist, therefore support men's rights and both genders who stay home to raise their children.

Due to sexism, I am trying to, every single day, stay out of society. I refrain from turning on my television, which is plagued with sexist talking heads, tv shows, and advertisements sandwiched between them. At this point, I read reviews on television shows before I watch them. I am a great lover of all this Sci-Fi, yet have discontinued to watvch Sci-Fi shows due to such ridiculously blatant sexism in recent Sci-Fi. For year 2009 I took the new television from my apartment due to throwing up over the sexism I witnessed in Hillary Clinton's campaign. Whenever I have dated men, our friendships we had before our dating life are replaced by these odd power struggles and gaslighting and complexes, I even had one man show me how much stronger his body was than mine by wrestling me into a fetal position. What spurred his doing this was my telling him I won a weightlifting contest and I was childishly excited about it. He called me "mariposa" because I am such a feminine persona. He is a big time athlete to this day. I have never held a dating-relationship that did not possess the guy trying to "conquer" and "overpower" me somehow. Dr Laura said the other day that "women are not conditioned for physical aggression and kinsethetic activity of dominance" but I would actually call her out on that, I think in regular life, women have much more instances in which they have to physically defend themselves in some respect, and Especially in war, all women must defend themselves even more! I would say women must be more combative than men because of this, and that women slack on their physicality. i think guns are a women's instrument, not a mans.

I have resolved to not date. As a 25 year old woman, I have now spent three years refusing dates and advances, and am an artist so I can stay in my apt most hours of the week, away from society. I am the happiest I have been in my life.

Stranger of KS 8:39AM January 14, 2012

About this blog

About this blog

Washington Whispers has been featured in U.S. News & World Report since 1933, offering a fun, insider's view of Washington.

advertisement

Latest Videos

advertisement