Huckabee's GOP Debate: Equal Time for All

December 2, 2011 RSS Feed Print

Mike Huckabee gave Whispers a behind-the-scenes look at what candidates can expect in the Republican presidential candidate forum on Fox News' Huckabee Saturday in New York.

"It's unique in that the questions are posed by elected GOP attorneys general who come from the field of play and not the press box, and the questions will focus on the very unique and substantive issues that involve federal/state relations in Obamacare, immigration, education, et cetera," Huckabee says.

Newt Gingrich, Ron Paul, Mitt Romney, Rep. Michele Bachmann, Rick Santorum, and Texas Gov. Rick Perry are expected. [See photos of Michele Bachmann.]

Huckabee says that the candidates will get equal time to answer questions, a key issue for the former presidential candidate. "Some candidates won't get cheated from opportunity to respond while the moderator and producers arbitrarily decide who the 'front-runners' are supposed to be and make a two-man show out of it."

Another difference from previous debates and forums? Candidates won't be allowed to attack each other. Huckabee says they will have to stay focused on the answers. [Check out our editorial cartoons on President Obama.]

"Even the order in which they appear and respond is determined by a drawing—not by the moderator or the AG's," he says.

Huckabee thinks his debate should be a model for other candidate forums. "First, each candidate will be treated with respect by being given equal time to others," he says. "Order in which they appear is not determined by media manipulation, but random drawing; the panel asking questions has actually had to face an election and aren't playing 'gotcha' with obscure stuff from years ago."

Tags:
Mike Huckabee,
debates,
2012 presidential election,
republican party

Reader Comments Read all comments (11)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

What a breath of fresh air! This debate was worthy of watching. The changed up format is much better. However, there are a few things I didn't like.. One was that the folks asking the questions were reading it off a card, and seemed well.. too scripted. They had no idea how to respond to the end questions, and presented some negativity. We could loose the "what did you think" segment of the debate at the end.. One woman even got to ask 2 questions, which I found wierd since there is a room full of Americans. I would have rather had more time with candidates. We can loose the 'abortion issues' questions at every debate, over and over again, for years now. NEWT is the only one of those candidates that will hold Oblama accountable during the primary's. I don't think any of the other candidates posses what it is going to take to win against the vamped up, over the top Oblama hollywood smoke & mirrors campaigning that is bound to occur.

JB of WA 3:13PM January 15, 2012

i liked the set up of just one interviewed at a time. I am sorry this was not publicized more so more people knew about it. I have watched EVERY debate so far and I am really enjoying them. carol Hegdahl

carol hegdahl of CA 6:18PM December 05, 2011

Thanks Huck, great job for the type of debate you hosted for GOP candidates. The viewers got the best interviewers yet (attorneys General) to ask good, practical questions and chance to see the candidates views without the interruptions and bickering that the other debates have had. The US Presidential election calls for a serious discussion.. not one liners!

Darlene Hoffman of IN 8:41PM December 04, 2011

About this blog

About this blog

Washington Whispers has been featured in U.S. News & World Report since 1933, offering a fun, insider's view of Washington.

advertisement

Latest Video

advertisement