Rick Perry Promises Pro-Life Vice President

August 31, 2011 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (18)

Surging Republican presidential candidate Rick Perry, the Texas governor, has pledged to influential Christian leaders that he will push pro-life policies, oppose gay marriage, and pick cabinet officials and a vice president who share his values, a promise that would rule out a Perry-Rudy Giuliani ticket.

At a weekend Texas gathering of about 200 conservative leaders, some from Washington, Perry and his wife Anita portrayed themselves as authentic and life-long conservatives who could bring the most pro-life administration ever to Washington. [Read more about the 2012 election.]

Over four hours of conversational questions and answers Saturday night and another two on Sunday morning, the couple addressed many questions from key players who are still just learning about Perry, the longest-ever serving Texas governor shoved into the presidential race after other big-name governors and former governors bailed out.

Key among the questions Perry fielded was who he would pick as a vice presidential candidate if he wins the nomination. Perry is an ally of Giuliani and endorsed him for president during the 2008 GOP primaries. At the time, he cited the former New York City mayor's ability to pull the city together after the 9/11 attacks.

However, conservatives, especially evangelicals, oppose Giuliani because he is pro-choice on abortion. Perry just signed an anti-abortion pledge from the Susan B. Anthony list that commits the signer to appointing pro-life officials, including the vice president. [See a slideshow of the 2012 Republican Contenders]

Some of those at the weekend conclave said Perry promised to stick to the pledge when considering a vice president and they left believing that meant Giuliani is out of the picture. Perry is currently far ahead of GOP pack in the polls.

He also addressed his controversial decision to mandate the HPV vaccine for Texas girls in the 6th grade. Perry told a story of how he decided without asking his wife, a nurse, who later scolded him for making it a mandate instead of a program parents can opt into. "I should have talked to her first," a source quoted Perry saying. He called his decision a mistake. [Read: Perry Surges, Obama Slips in Latest Poll.]

At one point, Anita Perry was also asked some questions. One pointed questioner said that in the past, conservatives have been surprised to find out that wives of presidents don't share their pro-life values. Anita Perry cast aside any concerns when she passionately said that she shares her husbands values and stands on key issues like gay marriage and abortion.

Perry also told stories about his recent back surgery and said "I've never felt better."

And he kidded about his book Fed Up, which is full of tough and controversial opinions like his view that Social Security is a Ponzi scheme. Making the case that he hadn't plotted a long-term path to the presidency like many others in the race, Perry said the proof is the book for which he's been criticized.

[Read Laura Chapin: Rick Perry's Texas Benefited from 'Washington Overspending' ]

Some at the weekend retreat, one of several Perry has held to woo influential conservatives, said he came off as a genuine and authentic conservative. "He was very approachable and confident in his skin," said one source. "A lot of us had never met him. We aren't donors. Most of us aren't even committed to a candidate. But he went a long way to convince us that he's the real McCoy," said the source. "He has the potential to kill the competition and take Obama out. He's a real bad ass."

What's more many invited into the tent at the rugged ranch of Perry supporter Jim Leininger near Fredricksburg, Texas said that Perry drew a bright line between what he would do, especially on federal spending, and what former President George Bush did. "It's clear the Bushes don't like him and he doesn't like what Bush did and that absolutely works for him," said a participant.

Tags:
Democratic Party,
Rudolph Giuliani,
Rick Perry,
abortion,
Republican Party

Reader Comments Read all comments (18)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Theocracy. Like Moslem fundamentalists, not Christians are my thoughts about Perry and Cain. Men who want to force women to follow their beliefs. So . . . have all babies, but don't provide reasonably priced health care or assistance. All pro-lifers should be assisting those who keep babies and help fo for 21 years. "Christians" should go into crack houses and difficult situations to help with homework and laundry, shovelling snow, buying groceries, diapers, clothes, you name it - and long term. People aren't Christians because they try to win points for heaven by being dogmatic holier than thous. They are Christians when they get out and help others, are kind, caring, not just people who convince themselves they believe in Jesus as if that truly is the only out, the believing in the man, not what he stood for, etc. Also, helping others isn't ripping a baby form a woman's arms after pro-lifers convince the woman to have a baby she can't afford - rip it from her arms and give it to a "Christian" who can't have a baby to raise as his or her own. Being Christian would mean helping the woman to raise her own child. Self righteous, dogmatic hard hearted, judgmental "Christians" who convince themselves they believe in Jesus and haven't a clue what life is like for many make me sick and make me think of women stoned in pits. There are all kinds of situations, and women should have the right to make a decision right for her. It is most galling when men tell women what to do as if the women are uneducated beings who have to be under the thumb of men (who often, by the grace of God didn't get lovers pregnant - or didn't know about abortions - or even did). Christians are often hypocritical. BEWARE of Calvanist Christians who think they are chosen by God. They aren't - and why aren't they asked why they think or know they are. Exactly how do they know? When I think Christian I think Jimmy Carter or Obama. I certainly don't think about the Republican candidates running. nb. why is so little heard from Ron Paul? It is appalling how little press he gets when he is the most well educated, intelligent, astute, aware Republican of them all. No wonder America is in such poor shape when the media focuses on buffoons and doesn't report fairly on issues or other candidates such as Ron Paul. I am Canadian - thank God.

Ahria of WY 12:53AM November 16, 2011

SURGING RICK PERRY, SURGING WHERE?

What the f planet are you on Paul Bedard?

Last time I checked Herman Cain was running away with the show!

Perry support for Illegal Immigrants has all but destroyed his Campaign!

Never mind this is dated 31 Aug 11, so this is a History lesson!

FLOYD IN FLORIDA of FL 3:55PM October 25, 2011

@Smartacus

OK, are you honestly arguing that there are no major flaws in the theory of evolution? Do you not recognize that discoveries are made all the time that radically change the theory? Do you not see that what "we know for a fact" today according to evolutionary theory (and that I'm an idiot for questioning) will soon be replaced by something completely different that we "know is a fact now"? Where I come from, a balloon with as many holes in it as the theory of evolution has would deflate pretty quickly. Even if, as you say, it "does a better job of explaining the natural world than any other theory out there", that doesn't make it true. Especially if something exists outside of the natural world and has an impact on it. Evolutionary theory can only attempt to explain life in a natural way. It is completely unable to allow for anything supernatural (God) to intervene. This alone should be a major red flag to you.

I do claim that there are gaps and if you disagree with that, you would honestly be the first evolutionist I've met who did. I don't claim that "duping" is a part of the equation though. I believe that men are desperate enough to NOT believe in and bow the knee to God that they will do and believe anything to convince themselves of it. I also believe that (hang on to your seat) if they persist in their insistence of disbelief, God allows them to go as far as they want in it.

I trust science within the limitations that are inherent within science. It is not a discipline that encompasses everything that exists. As mentioned before, it has no capacity for measuring the supernatural. It is (by definition) limited to natural processes. By the way, there are plenty of bona fide geologists and microbiologists who reject evolution. In addition, the majority view does not determine what is actually true - if it did, then we'd still agree with the 9th century Greek philosophers (scientists) who insisted that the Sun went around the Earth.

Are you telling me that what I wrote earlier about bacteria and antibiotics is a "bogus and cliche counter argument about gaining genetic material"? Maybe I didn't make this clear enough in my last post: "All I said is that drug-resistant bacteria is not an example of evolution in action." If you disagree with that statement, you would again be the first evolutionist I've met that does so.

Bottom line, in the end one or both of us is blinded because we can't both be right. If it is both of us, then our conversation doesn't matter because we will never find truth together. If it's me, then some day I'll just cease to exist and again, our conversation doesn't matter. If it is you, then our conversation suddenly becomes extremely significant.

"For the word of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God." - 1 Corinthians 1:18

Eric of IN 12:25AM September 03, 2011

About this blog

About this blog

Washington Whispers has been featured in U.S. News & World Report since 1933, offering a fun, insider's view of Washington.

advertisement

Latest Videos

advertisement