Never-Wrong Pundit Picks Obama to Win in 2012

August 30, 2011 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (347)

Allan Lichtman, the American University professor whose election formula has correctly called every president since Ronald Reagan’s 1984 re-election, has a belated birthday present for Barack Obama: Rest easy, your re-election is in the bag.

“Even if I am being conservative, I don’t see how Obama can lose,” says Lichtman, the brains behind The Keys to the White House.

Lichtman’s prediction helps to explain a quirk in some polling that finds that while Americans disapprove of the president, they still think he will win re-election. [Check out political cartoons about the 2012 GOP field.]

Working for the president are several of Lichtman’s keys, tops among them incumbency and the scandal-free nature of his administration.Undermining his re-election is a lack of charisma and leadership on key issues, says Lichtman, even including healthcare, Obama’s crowning achievement.

Lichtman developed his 13 Keys in 1981. They test the performance of the party that holds the presidency. If six or more of the 13 keys go against the party in power, then the opposing party wins.“The keys have figured into popular politics a bit,” Lichtman says. “They’ve never missed. They’ve been right seven elections in a row. A number that goes way beyond statistical significance in a record no other system even comes close to.”

Lichtman’s earned quite the reputation. In 1992, it seemed likely former President George H.W. Bush would be re-elected, having reached historic highs in popularity after he launched a war that pushed Iraqi troops out of Kuwait. But Lichtman thought otherwise and that factored into former Arkansas Gov. Bill Clinton’s decision to challenge Bush.“I got a call from this woman with a thick southern drawl. It was Clinton’s special assistant. She wanted to know if it was true that a Democrat could win. I assured her it was and I sent Clinton a copy of my book and a memo and the rest is history.” [See photos of the Obamas behind the scenes.]

In 2005, Lichtman also hit a home run when he said that the political stage was looking so bad for Republicans that Democrats could pick a name out of the phone book and win in 2008, the year a little known first-term senator became the first African-American to win the presidency.

Now Lichtman’s predicting a repeat performance by Obama.

Below are each of the keys and how it falls for Obama.

  1. Party mandate: After the midterm elections, the incumbent party holds more seats in the U.S. House of Representatives than it did after the previous midterm elections. Says Lichtman, “Even back in January 2010 when I first released my predictions, I was already counting on a significant loss.” Obama loses this key.
  2. Contest: There is no serious contest for the incumbent party nomination. Says Lichtman on Obama’s unchallenged status, “I never thought there would be any serious contest against Barack Obama in the Democratic primary.” Obama wins this key.
  3. Incumbency: The incumbent party candidate is the sitting president. Easy win here for Obama.
  4. Third Party: There is no significant third party challenge. Obama wins this point.
  5. Short term economy: The economy is not in recession during the election campaign. Here Lichtman declares an “undecided.”
  6. Long-term economy: Real per capita economic growth during the term equals or exceeds mean growth during the previous two terms. Says Lichtman, “I discounted long term economy against Obama. Clearly we are in a recession.” Obama loses this key. [Read: Seven Ways Obama Can Gain Credibility on Jobs.]
  7. Policy change: The incumbent administration effects major changes in national policy. “There have been major policy changes in this administration. We’ve seen the biggest stimulus in history and an complete overhaul of the healthcare system so I gave him policy change,” says the scholar. Another win for Obama.
  8. Social unrest: There is no sustained social unrest during the term. Says Lichtman, “There wasn’t any social unrest when I made my predictions for 2012 and there still isn’t.” Obama wins a fifth key here.
  9. Scandal: The incumbent administration is untainted by major scandal. “This administration has been squeaky clean. There’s nothing on scandal,” says Lichtman. Another Obama win.
  10. Foreign/military failure: The incumbent administration suffers no major failure in foreign or military affairs. Says Lichtman, “We haven’t seen any major failure that resembles something like the Bay of Pigs and don’t foresee anything.” Obama wins again.
  11. Foreign/military success: The incumbent administration achieves a major success in foreign or military affairs. “Since Osama bin Laden was found and killed, I think Obama has achieved military success.” Obama wins his eighth key.
  12. Incumbent charisma: The incumbent party candidate is charismatic or a national hero. Explains Lichtman, “I did not give President Obama the incumbent charisma key. I counted it against him. He’s really led from behind. He didn’t really take the lead in the healthcare debate, he didn’t use his speaking ability to move the American people during the recession. He’s lost his ability to connect since the 2008 election.” Obama loses this key. [See political cartoons about President Obama.]
  13. Challenger charisma: The challenging party candidate is not charismatic or a national hero. Says Lichtman, “We haven’t seen any candidate in the GOP who meets this criteria and probably won’t.” Obama wins, bringing his total to nine keys, three more than needed to win reelection.

 

Tags:
Democratic Party,
Barack Obama,
Bill Clinton,
Ronald Reagan,
George H.W. Bush

Reader Comments Read all comments (347)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Never wrong pundit does it again! As of mid-November, 2012, he remains 'never wrong.' Impressive record, actually running forward from 1860 to the Present. Well done, Mr. Lichtman! Science would seem to be on your side ~ I'm a believer!

JonBergen of PA 7:11AM November 09, 2012

George,

You sound just like the rest of them. You say the president had a hideous record? During the president’s first inauguration, republican leadership came together and pledged to obstruct anything the president tried to accomplish. Do you blame the democrats for that? Do you blame the president for that? You acknowledged that Bush put the country in a dire situation while in office, and then you imply that he should be given some of the credit for recovery we are seeing now vis-à-vis TARP . Just like the rest of your likeminded cronies, you imply that the president wants the rich to pay “high” taxes when in reality he’s only wanting them to pay what everyone else pays – their fair share!

Romney lost because the American people saw him in the end for what he really is… a liar and a man with a questionable moral and ethical core. I listened closely to many of his stump speeches and I was appalled with the many the lies and half-truths he constantly spoke. I’m not naive and I understand the nature of political campaigns but Mr. Romney crossed the line with me over and over again when he told shameless unabashed lies about his position on so many major issues and about his opponent – the president. What is especially disturbing is that he claims to be a man of God. What a joke.

He claimed he was a job creator but let’s check the record… but before we check, let’s define what a job creator is. Here’s how I see it; job creators are people who, by virtue of their business activities, create jobs by design. That is to say, a planned outcome of their business activity is to create jobs - much like creating profit. Romney touted Bain Capital and his stent as Governor of Mass as his “job creating” experience. Bain Capital did not create one single job by design. The only jobs ever created by Bain were a byproduct of the company’s quest for profits. If there were no profit in it for Bain, not one single job would have ever been created. Here is Bain’s mission statement...” Bain & Company's mission is to help our clients create such high levels of economic value that together we set new standards of excellence in our respective industries.” Simply put, their mission statement says “We make a lot of money for our investors.” Don’t get me wrong, there is nothing wrong with that, but keep it real… Bain (and Romney while he was CEO) never cared about creating jobs! I find it interesting that they made billions and never made a “thing” while doing so. 100% of Bain’s profits came from diverting funds from companies they invested in. The classic ‘rich get richer while the poor get poorer” scenario.

As governor of Mass, Romney was ranked of 48th of 50 states in terms of job creation. Facts are facts and there is not much else to say about this. It doesn’t get much worse than that! His record as a job creator was a bunch of garbage.

It says a lot about the republican ticket when neither candidate can secure the vote in their home state. Wisconsin and Mass voted for Obama. That fact in itself is very telling. The people that know them best voted against them.

Over the past 4 years the majority of republicans have embraced the position that they would do whatever necessary to ensure the president is not re-elected. They cared about little else. I’ve listened to the several post election speeches by republican leadership and they have vowed to continue their obstructionist ways. When will you guys learn? America is watching you and she fed up with your foolish behavior!

I could keep writing for hours but I will let you guys and gals chew in this for a while…

The American people have spoken!

Hillary 2016!

Wisdom of LA 9:45AM November 07, 2012

George,

You sound just like the rest of them. You say the president had a hideous record? During the president’s first inauguration, republican leadership came together and pledged to obstruct anything the president tried to accomplish. Do you blame the democrats for that? Do you blame the president for that? You acknowledged that Bush put the country in a dire situation while in office, and then you imply that he should be given some of the credit for recovery we are seeing now vis-à-vis TARP . Just like the rest of your likeminded cronies, you imply that the president wants the rich to pay “high” taxes when in reality he’s only wanting them to pay what everyone else pays – their fair share!

Romney lost because the American people saw him in the end for what he really is… a liar and a man with a questionable moral and ethical core. I listened closely to many of his stump speeches and I was appalled with the many the lies and half-truths he constantly spoke. I’m not naive and I understand the nature of political campaigns but Mr. Romney crossed the line with me over and over again when he told shameless unabashed lies about his position on so many major issues and about his opponent – the president. What is especially disturbing is that he claims to be a man of God. What a joke.

He claimed he was a job creator but let’s check the record… but before we check, let’s define what a job creator is. Here’s how I see it; job creators are people who, by virtue of their business activities, create jobs by design. That is to say, a planned outcome of their business activity is to create jobs - much like creating profit. Romney touted Bain Capital and his stent as Governor of Mass as his “job creating” experience. Bain Capital did not create one single job by design. The only jobs ever created by Bain were a byproduct of the company’s quest for profits. If there were no profit in it for Bain, not one single job would have ever been created. Here is Bain’s mission statement...” Bain & Company's mission is to help our clients create such high levels of economic value that together we set new standards of excellence in our respective industries.” Simply put, their mission statement says “We make a lot of money for our investors.” Don’t get me wrong, there is nothing wrong with that, but keep it real… Bain (and Romney while he was CEO) never cared about creating jobs! I find it interesting that they made billions and never made a “thing” while doing so. 100% of Bain’s profits came from diverting funds from companies they invested in. The classic ‘rich get richer while the poor get poorer” scenario.

As governor of Mass, Romney was ranked of 48th of 50 states in terms of job creation. Facts are facts and there is not much else to say about this. It doesn’t get much worse than that! His record as a job creator was a bunch of garbage.

It says a lot about the republican ticket when neither candidate can secure the vote in their home state. Wisconsin and Mass voted for Obama. That fact in itself is very telling. The people that know them best voted against them.

Over the past 4 years the majority of republicans have embraced the position that they would do whatever necessary to ensure the president is not re-elected. They cared about little else. I’ve listened to the several post election speeches by republican leadership and they have vowed to continue their obstructionist ways. When will you guys learn? America is watching you and she fed up with your foolish behavior!

I could keep writing for hours but I will let you guys and gals chew in this for a while…

The American people have spoken!

Hillary 2016!

Wisdom of LA 9:43AM November 07, 2012

About this blog

About this blog

Washington Whispers has been featured in U.S. News & World Report since 1933, offering a fun, insider's view of Washington.

advertisement

Latest Videos

advertisement