Never-Wrong Pundit Picks Obama to Win in 2012

August 30, 2011 RSS Feed Print

Allan Lichtman, the American University professor whose election formula has correctly called every president since Ronald Reagan’s 1984 re-election, has a belated birthday present for Barack Obama: Rest easy, your re-election is in the bag.

“Even if I am being conservative, I don’t see how Obama can lose,” says Lichtman, the brains behind The Keys to the White House.

Lichtman’s prediction helps to explain a quirk in some polling that finds that while Americans disapprove of the president, they still think he will win re-election. [Check out political cartoons about the 2012 GOP field.]

Working for the president are several of Lichtman’s keys, tops among them incumbency and the scandal-free nature of his administration.Undermining his re-election is a lack of charisma and leadership on key issues, says Lichtman, even including healthcare, Obama’s crowning achievement.

Lichtman developed his 13 Keys in 1981. They test the performance of the party that holds the presidency. If six or more of the 13 keys go against the party in power, then the opposing party wins.“The keys have figured into popular politics a bit,” Lichtman says. “They’ve never missed. They’ve been right seven elections in a row. A number that goes way beyond statistical significance in a record no other system even comes close to.”

Lichtman’s earned quite the reputation. In 1992, it seemed likely former President George H.W. Bush would be re-elected, having reached historic highs in popularity after he launched a war that pushed Iraqi troops out of Kuwait. But Lichtman thought otherwise and that factored into former Arkansas Gov. Bill Clinton’s decision to challenge Bush.“I got a call from this woman with a thick southern drawl. It was Clinton’s special assistant. She wanted to know if it was true that a Democrat could win. I assured her it was and I sent Clinton a copy of my book and a memo and the rest is history.” [See photos of the Obamas behind the scenes.]

In 2005, Lichtman also hit a home run when he said that the political stage was looking so bad for Republicans that Democrats could pick a name out of the phone book and win in 2008, the year a little known first-term senator became the first African-American to win the presidency.

Now Lichtman’s predicting a repeat performance by Obama.

Below are each of the keys and how it falls for Obama.

  1. Party mandate: After the midterm elections, the incumbent party holds more seats in the U.S. House of Representatives than it did after the previous midterm elections. Says Lichtman, “Even back in January 2010 when I first released my predictions, I was already counting on a significant loss.” Obama loses this key.
  2. Contest: There is no serious contest for the incumbent party nomination. Says Lichtman on Obama’s unchallenged status, “I never thought there would be any serious contest against Barack Obama in the Democratic primary.” Obama wins this key.
  3. Incumbency: The incumbent party candidate is the sitting president. Easy win here for Obama.
  4. Third Party: There is no significant third party challenge. Obama wins this point.
  5. Short term economy: The economy is not in recession during the election campaign. Here Lichtman declares an “undecided.”
  6. Long-term economy: Real per capita economic growth during the term equals or exceeds mean growth during the previous two terms. Says Lichtman, “I discounted long term economy against Obama. Clearly we are in a recession.” Obama loses this key. [Read: Seven Ways Obama Can Gain Credibility on Jobs.]
  7. Policy change: The incumbent administration effects major changes in national policy. “There have been major policy changes in this administration. We’ve seen the biggest stimulus in history and an complete overhaul of the healthcare system so I gave him policy change,” says the scholar. Another win for Obama.
  8. Social unrest: There is no sustained social unrest during the term. Says Lichtman, “There wasn’t any social unrest when I made my predictions for 2012 and there still isn’t.” Obama wins a fifth key here.
  9. Scandal: The incumbent administration is untainted by major scandal. “This administration has been squeaky clean. There’s nothing on scandal,” says Lichtman. Another Obama win.
  10. Foreign/military failure: The incumbent administration suffers no major failure in foreign or military affairs. Says Lichtman, “We haven’t seen any major failure that resembles something like the Bay of Pigs and don’t foresee anything.” Obama wins again.
  11. Foreign/military success: The incumbent administration achieves a major success in foreign or military affairs. “Since Osama bin Laden was found and killed, I think Obama has achieved military success.” Obama wins his eighth key.
  12. Incumbent charisma: The incumbent party candidate is charismatic or a national hero. Explains Lichtman, “I did not give President Obama the incumbent charisma key. I counted it against him. He’s really led from behind. He didn’t really take the lead in the healthcare debate, he didn’t use his speaking ability to move the American people during the recession. He’s lost his ability to connect since the 2008 election.” Obama loses this key. [See political cartoons about President Obama.]
  13. Challenger charisma: The challenging party candidate is not charismatic or a national hero. Says Lichtman, “We haven’t seen any candidate in the GOP who meets this criteria and probably won’t.” Obama wins, bringing his total to nine keys, three more than needed to win reelection.

 

Tags:
Bill Clinton,
Barack Obama,
Ronald Reagan,
democratic party,
George H.W. Bush

Reader Comments Read all comments (267)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

I believe there are scandals , but they have been relatively unreported by the fawning media. I believe Solyndra, Fast & Furious, and his recess appointments when the Senate was not in recess are scandals.Also, yes Obama created a majpr policy change with Healthcaree- but it is unpopular. I dispute that Obama wins those two points.

Thoma sMichelmore of IL 4:21PM February 22, 2012

OK CATT, let’s take a look at the real facts... President Obama took office under the worse conditions than any other president in the history of our country. His predecessor, G. W. Bush moved the country from trillions of dollars in surplus to over 3 trillion dollars in dept during his administration. He, GWB was the worst president in the history of our nation – militarily, strategically, and financially. The economy was in steep decline and it was all because of GWB’s failed leadership. Presidents have been trying to pass health care reformed in this country since back in the days of Kennedy. President Obama was the man that got it done. Health care costs in this country had more than doubled in the previous 10 years and was on course to double again in the next 5 years. The new health care reform has ended that downward spiral and when fully implemented in 2014 will once again make healthcare affordable for the masses in America.

I hear you folks complain about all the money spent on the stimulus packages by this administration while unemployment still hovers around 8.5%... did you ever consider that if not for the spending, the unemployment rate would be steady at over 20%. Do you have no understanding of how bad things were as the previous administration left office? Who did GW Bush endorse last election? Who is he endorsing this election? None of the republican candidates want his endorsement – that would be tantamount to suicide for their campaigns. How bad of a president must you have been if your colleagues ask…”do me a favor and don’t endorse me – hell, don’t even mention my name.”

This country was on the brink of collapse the president is turning it around – despite the antics of the opposition. You republicans have tried everything possible to sabotage this administration. I heard several sitting congressmen state publically that they would not support anything put forth by the president… even if it was good for his/her constituency. This kind of partisan politics has been going on since President Obama got elected. America is tired of it and will demonstrate it come November.

With the current crop of Republican candidates for the White House, the president has no worries. He will be re-elected in a landslide. The economy is growing; the reputation of the US as a world leader has been restored; most troops will be home soon from the Middle East, and the future is looking brighter every day for most Americans. If you can’t or won’t see the truth, I feel sorry for you. Years from now, when the current administration is compared to those of past presidents, President Obama will rank amongst the best this country has ever had. Thanks for all you do Mr. President! God Bless America!!!!

WCurry of OK 1:40PM February 22, 2012

Obama has done nothing, but has added 12 trillion on in debt., bailed out a auto manufacturing company that is 52% owned by Fiat, and still hasn't paid billions back to tax payers,destroying the militaryJust a year after signing a new Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty with Russia, President Obama wants more drastic cuts to America's nuclear arsenal. This should come as no surprise to anybody who paid attention to his April 2009 speech in Prague. Obama said that the United States would take concrete steps toward "a world without nuclear weapons," while merely urging "others to do the same." Apparently, Obama doesn't put stock in the Reagan maxim that, especially in strategic nuclear weaponry, America should always "trust, but verify."

In that same speech, Obama claimed the threat of nuclear war has decreased in recent years but the risk of a nuclear attack has gone up, citing proliferation of the weapons of mass destruction and terrorists' determination to obtain them. Still, he said we should divorce American national defense strategy from nuclear weapons, while hoping other members of the club would follow suit. This is called "cognitive dissonance," the ability to believe two contradictory things simultaneously. Liberals see it as evidence of intellectual sophistication. Realists see it as magical thinking.

Refuses to enforce immigration laws while illegals cost 123 billion a year to tax payers has promised to stop deporting illegals and have some kinda back door amnesty program.

Just gutted Social Sec for 100 billion to fund extension on unemployed benefits, and give families $40.00 extra, to help off set the price of $5.00 gal gas.

Americans if Obama is re elected he will destroy the US from within with his liberal,socialist views.

catt of GA 7:55PM February 19, 2012

About this blog

About this blog

Washington Whispers has been featured in U.S. News & World Report since 1933, offering a fun, insider's view of Washington.

advertisement

Latest Video

advertisement