Scientists Slam Link Between Hurricanes and Global Warming

August 29, 2011 RSS Feed Print

As Hurricane Irene whimpers off to Canada, earlier suggestions that it and predictions of a harsh 2011 hurricane season can be linked to global warming are being slammed in a new report from skeptical scientists.

Just like the hyped predictions of disaster to the East Coast from Irene over the weekend, the new report says that models used by global warming scientists "over-estimate" the the warming trends of the globe to back up their warnings of future droughts, killer storms, and famine. [See a slide show of 10 reasons Americans aren't talking about climate change.]

While "Climate Change Reconsidered"  from the Heartland Institute, does agree that man has hurt his environment, causing events like flooding, it's not because of pollution or other greenhouse gasses cited by proponents of global warming like former Vice President Al Gore. In the case of flooding, the report argues, it's mostly because mankind is bad at construction. "Climate change ranks well below other contributors, such as dikes and levee construction, to increased flooding," it says.

As for hurricanes, like Irene, the skeptical scientists report that storm frequency does not track with global temperature fluctuations and they add that historical trends show that storms were worse during the Medieval period of about 950–1250 AD.

The scientists who headed the project are well-known in their field and are led by global warming critic Fred Singer, professor emeritus of environmental sciences at the University of Virginia.

Their report, provided to Whispers today, comes as the war over global warming is getting hot. Gore, for example, last week called skeptics this generation's racists, and Democrats and Republicans are still fighting over President Obama's cap-and-trade proposal and new anti-pollution regulations from the Environmental Protection Agency. Also, global warming is making a debut on the presidential stage with GOP candidates like Texas Gov. Rick Perry questioning it.  [See political cartoons about the 2012 GOP presidential field.]

Like those who say science proves the existence of man-made global warming, the skeptics also are armed with historical trends and science that suggest that current global warming is just part of an up and down trend over centuries.

What's unusual about the report is that it says temporary global warming has a human benefit in curbing weather-related deaths. "Global warming is more likely to improve rather than harm human health because rising temperatures lead to a greater reduction in winter deaths than the increase they cause in summer deaths," concludes the report.

Tags:
global warming,
Al Gore,
hurricanes,
Rick Perry,
Barack Obama,
2012 presidential election

Reader Comments Read all comments (38)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

the re-publishers of this report should be ashamed of themselves. I hope they live to see the plagues that will be caused by global warming in the upcoming decades.

common sense advocate of CA 12:05PM December 20, 2011

The Heartland institute is a think tank not to be taken seriously because it is highly motivated to deny health risks beginning with second hand smoke and tobacco back in the 90's.

We all know now that tobacco smoke causes problems so Heartland is hardly a source to rely on when it comes to man's pollution and climate change.

ria rogers of MI 6:14PM October 27, 2011

What idiots think the world is large? I've been around it plenty--not so large. Almost 7 billion people and all the animals that we eat is enough to pig up the place. Every person creates about 1600 lbs of garbage a year x 7 billion and our garbage is not likely all biodegradeable. We don't have just one giant garbage patch of plastic in the Pacific ocean there are now 3 garbage patches in other areas. Every single energy supplier that uses coal has residual coal ash or flyash that contains mercury, arsenic, lead, etc. It's been stashed in every orifice of the U.S. and that's plenty since there are 100,000 abandoned mines alone. The coalash is in there mixing toxins into the earth. If there is an old quarry near you the chances are a utility company is filling it with flyash. As for the air, only 2% mercury released by coalburners enters our fresh water is what utilities put on display. What they don't explain is methyl mercury. It mixes with algae at the bottom of lakes to produce methymercury that is at least 30x's more toxic. From our usgs: "Methylmercury [CH3Hg] is the most toxic form. It affects the immune system, alters genetic and enzyme systems, and damages the nervous system, including coordination and the senses of touch, taste, and sight." Earth is a closed system. Stuff doesn't just disappear or float off into space. If we can overfish our biggest areas, the oceans, than yeah the world isn't all that big. Read Time Mags article on fish. 1/2 the fish consumed on earth is farm raised not from our oceans. Get informed and quit listening to politicians when it comes to the environment. They're in it for the almighty dollar and could care less.

Ria Rogers of MI 6:09PM October 27, 2011

About this blog

About this blog

Washington Whispers has been featured in U.S. News & World Report since 1933, offering a fun, insider's view of Washington.

advertisement

Latest Video

advertisement