HBO Movie Slams Bush, Rove, Chamber

June 23, 2011 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (5)

Former President George W. Bush, Karl Rove, and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce play the scheming villains in a new documentary about the pitfalls of the U.S. civil justice system, while Sen. Al Franken plays the knight in shining armor.

Hot Coffee, a film festival darling that premieres on HBO Monday night, portrays the other side of the heated debate over tort reform, which is the effort to end so-called frivolous lawsuits and limit what people can gain from personal injury lawsuits.

Starting with the infamous—and, the film shows, wildly misinterpreted—McDonald’s coffee case, in which a woman sued the fast food joint after a scalding cup of coffee spilled on her lap, the film seeks to expose big business’s role in limiting individuals’ right to the court system and limiting a jury’s ability to decide what compensation a victim of negligence or malpractice deserves.

The film has Rove, Bush, and the Chamber of Commerce continuously fighting to protect big business over the little guy, and documents the Chamber bankrolling business-friendly candidates in state Supreme Court judicial elections while brutally attacking their opponents.

The media gets slammed, too, for its role in propagating errant details about court cases without fact-checking.

Franken’s heroism comes in the last segment of the film, in which he fights for the right to a day in court for Jamie Leigh Jones, now 26, who, while working for the government contractor Halliburton/KBR in Iraq six years ago, was allegedly drugged and gang-raped by her colleagues, then locked in a shipping container. Since a clause in her employment contract required any disputes be resolved by arbitration—essentially settling out of court in private proceedings—she couldn’t take her case to trial.

Fighting mandatory arbitration is a new passion for Franken, who currently has a bill in the Senate that would get rid of those kinds of agreements in contracts altogether. Speaking before a prerelease screening of Hot Coffee in Washington, D.C., the former Saturday Night Live star said he wasn’t thrilled when Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid first assigned him to the Judiciary Committee, since he isn’t a lawyer and plenty of other senators are. “I did not know what mandatory arbitration really meant,” he said, then joked: “Well, I’d heard it, I knew what it meant—I’m not a lawyer, but I’m not an idiot.”

Because of Franken’s efforts, Jones’s trial began last week.

Tags:
Democratic Party,
Al Franken,
Karl Rove,
George W. Bush,
U.S. Chamber of Commerce

Reader Comments Read all comments (5)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

MY GOD IN HEAVEN...

I WOULD SAY FORGIVE THEM FATHER FOR THEY KNOW NOT WHAT THEY DO...BUT THEY KNEW...

Forgive Me If I Pour My Heart Onto This Page...

But I Can No Longer Allow These Paid-Litical Leeches To Legislate Mass Murder Then Give Corporate America A License To KILL...What You Call TORT REFORM I Call Getting Away With MURDER At The Victims Expense!

According To The Journal Of The American Medical Association 106,000 Americans DIE EACH YEAR FROM TAKING PHARMACEUTICAL DRUGS CORRECTLY! While 2 Million Americans Suffer Premanent Damaged From The Side Effects Of These Deadly Doses!

If You Dig A Little Deeper You'll Find That TORT REFORM GOT IT'S START From The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act Of 1986. The (NCVIA) Was Started To Protect Vaccine Maker From Lawsuits From Parents Whos Children Have Been Premanetly Injured Or Died From A Vaccination. To Keep Pharmaceuitcal Companies Out Of The The Courtroom Parents Would Have To File Claims With The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (NVICP) If Their Child Was Injured Or Died! If You Weren't Happy With The (NVICP) Compensation You Would Have To Wait 2 To 10 Years To Have Your Day In Court!

In December Of 2005 Senate Majority Leader BILL FRIST And House Speaker DENNIS HASTERT Cut A Deal To Protect Pharmaceutical Companies From Lawsuits Without The House Or Senate Approval! They Planted This In The Defense Department Appropriations BILL At The Last Minute!

THIS ILLEGAL BILL HAD THE DEPARTMENT OF (HHS) ISSUE A DECLARATION OF PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCY THEREBY PROTECTING PHARMACEUTICAL AGAINST LAWSUITS INVOLVING THE MANUFACTURE, TESTING, DEVELOPMENT, DISTRIBUTION, USE OF VACCINES OR OTHER DRUGS!

According To The Washington Post Article Dated Feb 11, 2011 Vaccine Makers Are Protected From Lawsuits From Parents If They Know The Vaccinations Caused Their Childs AUTISIM!

IF THE PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES DIDN'T KNOW THAT VACCINATIONS MAYBE THE CAUSED OF YOUR CHILDS AUTISM...THEN WHY WOULD THEIR BE LEGISLATION TO PROTECT PHRAMACEUTICAL COMPANIES FROM LAWSUITS FROM PARENTS WHO'S CHILDREN HAVE BEEN INJURED OR DIED?

Every Branch Of U.S. Government Has Been Bought And Sold By Corporate America For Pennies On Dollar! Poison For Profit Is The Plan These Paid-Litical Leeches And They Don't Care About Anything But MONEY!...

When The Dust Settles On These Poison Prescriptions In America It Will Make Hitler's Holocust, Saddam Gasing Of The Kurds, And Osama Bin Laden 9/11 Look Humane...

I Tell You This Because A 30 Day Sample Of ABILIFY KILLED My Fiancee' In 30 Days!

As For These Paid-Litical Leeches...May Your Ill-Gotten Gains Slip Through Your Fingertips Like Water...May You Never Keep A Dime Of That BLOOD MONEY And May You And Your Childrens, Children Reap What You Have Sown!

Stacey Bridges

Native FROM Northern Virginia

Widowed 1 Year, 7 Months, And 2 Days

Witness To The Pharmaceutical Genocide Perpetrated On The American People The Advertised On National TV

Stacey Bridges of VA 1:06AM July 09, 2011

I am in agreement with Dave C of TX above. The trial lawyers are a major source of campaign funds for the Dems. The trial lawyers are dependent on the Dems to make favorable laws to protect the trial lawyers' source of money. There is a conflict of interest all the way around.

dkwoodworth of MI 9:00PM June 24, 2011

90% of torts are between corporations. The idea that its one vs. the big corporation is a fallacy. Majority of lawsuits are brought by corporations, not individuals.

The number of tort (personal injury) cases has been declining for years. According to the National Center for State Courts, tort cases accounted for just 4.4 percent of all civil cases filed in 2008, and declined by 25 percent between 1999 and 2008. Tort filings in state courts decreased by six percent between 2007 and 2008.

According to the Justice Department under President George W. Bush, the number of federal tort cases resolved in U.S. District Courts fell by 79 percent between 1985 and 2003. In 1985, 3,600 tort trials were decided by a judge or jury in U.S. District Courts. By 2003, that number had dropped to less than 800.1

Additionally, the most recent statistics from the Administration’s Bureau of Justice Statistics show the number of tort trials at the state level has decreased. These statistics were compiled as part of the Bureau’s survey of state civil justice systems in the nation’s largest 75 counties. Among these counties, the number of tort trials decreased 31.8 percent between 1992 and 2001.

http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/index.cfm?ty=pbdetail&iid=888

Have insurance rate gone up? Sure. The insurance industry is one of the most profitable industries. The companies typically make most of their profits in stocks and bonds. When the bubble burst on Wall Street the industry jacked up premiums to maintain their profit margin.

Will outlawing our right to sue grossly negligent doctors for punitive damages stop the escalating costs of health care? The non-partisan Congressional Budget Office figures that medical malpractice lawsuits account for one half of one percent of health care costs.

Would insurance rates go down? According to the American Insurance Association, "The insurance industry never promised that tort reform would achieve specific premium savings." (March 13, 2002) and the American Tort Reform Association added, "We wouldn't tell you or anyone that the reason to pass tort reform would be to reduce rates." (July 19, 1999).

Aaron of NJ 7:24AM June 24, 2011

About this blog

About this blog

Washington Whispers has been featured in U.S. News & World Report since 1933, offering a fun, insider's view of Washington.

advertisement

Latest Videos

advertisement