Younger Women Desert Female Candidates

June 20, 2011 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (3)

The political sisterhood, led by activists from Gloria Steinem to Hillary Clinton, is dead. New polling finds that younger women (aged 18 to 34) are cool with the status of women in politics and don't see any need to help their gender at the ballot box.

"The primary reason for it is that younger women do not perceive...it to be that unusual to have women running," says a disappointed Celinda Lake, a Democratic pollster who teamed with Republican pollster Bob Carpenter to conduct research on the 2010 gubernatorial campaigns for the Barbara Lee Foundation.

Worse, she says, younger women expressed support for female candidates but deserted them on Election Day.

In the 1960s through the '80s, women flooded the polls to help female candidates during the women's liberation period. Now, younger women see that the era worked, and women are installed at virtually every level of politics, says Lake.

"Young women are used to seeing women in leadership positions and also very influenced by the emergence of very strong, vivid women candidates in Hillary Clinton and Sarah Palin, and I think one of the major things is that they just don't perceive there to be that much of a problem, that we have a lot of women running; we have Hillary, you have Sarah, what's the problem?" she says. [Vote now: Has Michelle Bachmann eclipsed Sarah Palin?]

Carpenter, vice president of American Viewpoint, adds, "having females in office is not the rarity that it was even 20 or 30 years ago."

The new poll, which looks at races where women ran for governor in 2010, did, however, find that older, baby boomer women were sticking with the sisterhood.

"A decade ago, we reported that younger women were among those voter groups with the strongest preference for a woman candidate, and suggested that higher turnout among young women was a strategy to combat high turnout among voters biased against women," report Lake and Carpenter in the poll. "In 2010, women under 50 were less likely than those over 50 to vote for the woman candidate. Younger women ages 18 to 34 expressed a slight preference and slight enthusiasm for women candidates, but that preference was not borne out in their actual voting behavior. Baby-boom-generation women over the age of 50 were the most supportive group of voters for women candidates."

Still, Barbara Lee, founder of the organization that works to help women get elected, notes that women are enjoying a "more level playing field" because voters look at women and men about the same on economic issues, strength, and leadership as they do men

What's more, women have advantages in areas men can't compete, such as "likability," which she said played a big role in the 2010 election for women, coming in second after partisanship as the key voting issue.

Nonetheless, Lake suggested that younger female voters should be reminded that men still greatly outnumber women in office and that the 2010 elections cut deeply into the number of women in public office.

"Not only do we not have that many, but 2010 made that worse," says Lake.

Tags:
working women,
female voters,
Hillary Clinton,
Sarah Palin,
politics

Reader Comments Read all comments (3)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

The real triumph is that the younger women may be seeing female and male candidates as equal, not viewing them through a gender lens. As much as I wish we could try to promote more female candidates to level the numbers in Congress, still, I'm optimistic about the younger generations.

Lynne Spreen of CA 8:45AM June 22, 2011

Ms Fisher is absolutely right. I am a boomer feminist, and even in the 1970s most of us distinguished among women. given two equally pro-woman, progressive candidates, one female and one male, i'd probably vote for the woman. the double-x chromosome doesn't make palin, bachmann, and company the best choices for women. if there were a choice between one of them and a bernie sanders or a barney frank , or even a mildly liberal man who supported roe v wade, it would be crazy to vote for the woman. those men are better 'sisters' than the far-right women.

Karen Lindsey of MA 11:32PM June 21, 2011

I am sorry but there is no way I am voting for a candidate just because she is a woman. Sarah Palin's and Michelle Bachmann's views do not match mine. For one thing they are anti-choice. I found it insulting when McCain picked Palin for a running mate to attract Hilary supporters. Having him think that because I am a woman I would vote for another woman just because she is a woman. I dont agree with your politics and platform as a man but gosh darnit since you have a woman now running, that changes everything. I will throw out all beliefs and ideology because we want a woman in the elected position. NOT!!!!

I love Senator Feinstein. That is a woman I am proud to vote for.

Kirsten Fisher of CA 3:22PM June 21, 2011

About this blog

About this blog

Washington Whispers has been featured in U.S. News & World Report since 1933, offering a fun, insider's view of Washington.

advertisement

Latest Videos

advertisement