Coal Regs Would Kill Jobs, Boost Energy Bills

June 8, 2011 RSS Feed Print

Two new EPA pollution regulations will slam the coal industry so hard that hundreds of thousands of jobs will be lost, and electric rates will skyrocket 11 percent to over 23 percent, according to a new study based on government data.

Overall, the rules aimed at making the air cleaner could cost the coal-fired power plant industry $180 billion, warns a trade group.

[Check out a roundup of political cartoons on energy policy.]

“Many of these severe impacts would hit families living in states already facing serious economic challenges,” said Steve Miller, president of the American Coalition for Clean Coal Electricity. “Because of these impacts, EPA should make major changes to the proposed regulations before they are finalized,” he said.

The EPA, however, tells Whispers that the hit the industry will suffer is worth the health benefits. “EPA has taken a number of sensible steps to protect public health, while also working with industry and other stakeholders to ensure that these important Clean Air Act standards—such as the first ever national Mercury and Air Toxics Standards for coal-fired power plants—are reasonable, common-sense, and achievable,” said spokesman Brendan Gilfillan. [Read Rep. Darrell Issa: Obama's Bad Policy, Harmful Regulations Add to Gas Prices.]

What’s more, officials said that just one of the rules to cut sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxide emissions will would yield up to $290 billion in annual health and welfare benefits in 2014. They say that amounts to preventing up to 36,000 premature deaths, 26,000 hospital and emergency room visits, and 240,000 cases of aggravated asthma. “This far outweighs the estimated annual costs,” says an official on background. [Check out political cartoons on the economy.]

Still, the EPA did note that the two new antipollution rules are “pending” and that the agency has “accepted and are considering feedback” from the industry.

The industry says the costs and potential to lose four jobs for every new clean energy job created isn’t worth the rules, especially in a job-starved economy. [See a slide show of the best cities to find a job.]

Referring to the analysis of the EPA regulations from National Economic Research Associates, Miller said they would be the most expensive rules ever imposed on power plants.

Coal-fired energy plants currently fuel about half of the nation’s energy supply.

Tags:
EPA,
unemployment,
energy policy and climate change

Reader Comments Read all comments (284)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Ignorance effects everyone differently, If those concerned would take the time to understand why it's necessary to clean up utility companys that have used coal fired burners for years without any consideration or desire to spend the money to use the technology available today that has been available for several years.

The lobbyists will do anything they have to do to win an election and the utility companys have lots of money, Their money should go to pollution control.

Lots of people worry about additional cost to our electric bill, you should be more concerned about the lives of our soldiers and the cost of our on going wars that are bankrupting our wonderfull country.

Americans must wake up now before its too late.

Frank P of NJ 9:59AM October 17, 2011

In his pro-"free"-market reply, Jack Hoff (oh that's cute) also stated,

"We are all more or less the product of our own choices, and some will choose wisely, prepare, and prosper, others will choose another course."

In other words, if you're poor, or struggling to maintain a decent standard of living, you have only yourself to blame; if you planned well and worked hard and gave it your best effort, you should be prosperous by now, since only YOU have any control over your own circumstances. You see, the only power in America is the power of individual people, and-- on the other side-- the power of the big bad Evil Government that's "intruding" on all of us individuals.

Well, no.

You see, there's that other powerful player, too. Remember? The "free" market. That's a SYSTEM. A big one. We lefties like to call it one of the "structural causes" of this country's inequality (rich get MUCH richer, more of us get poorer). It's a systematic organization of power and resources. And it uses many of those resources to promote its own agenda and enrich itself, by having its lobbyists (and the Congress it owns) write laws that do things such as:

--union-busting, to keep wages and benefits down.

--creating loopholes so corporations as large as GE can pay NO U.S. income tax, while still exploiting the services and resources of the U.S. government, all at the expense of the vanishing middle class. "Sure, we're an American company. Huh? You ask why our main corporate office is in the Cayman Islands? Oh, don't worry your pretty little head about such things!"

--And this GENUINE job-killing policy: creating tax breaks that reward, not penalize, corporations for sending our jobs overseas. In contrast to what's claimed in the above article, this policy really DOES kill hundreds of thousands of American jobs! (I want to know, why aren't you patriots calling it treason?)

--Another TRUE job-killer is when a corporation "downsizes" thousands of jobs out of existence, not because it actually needs to produce less, but because its big institutional shareholders want to grab a quick temporary profit (and the CEO wants to get a nice fat bonus) by slashing costs, regardless of what it does to the company's future, not to mention the thousands of workers who needed those jobs to survive.

So you see, it's not just "our own choices" that determine our fate in this society. There are powerful institutional forces set up to steer things toward a future that favors the wealthy, destroys the middle class, and turns most of us into frightened wage-slaves. (You want good affordable health care? That's a luxury! But, health-insurance executives making millions of dollars by denying you coverage? No, of course THAT'S not luxury! Hush now!)

"Oh yeah?" you ask. "Well, if corporate capitalism is so bad, then what would you replace it with?"

THAT is what we ALL have to start figuring out, before this whole house of gold-plated cards collapses on top of us.

neal campbell of NY 10:39PM August 10, 2011

Ah, yes, just like Rush Limbaugh's "It's just that simple!"-- which is like a plea for things to be simpler than they really are. Let us have a near-religious faith in the "free market," and it will always keep us secure and prosperous, right?

Well, guess what: In an era of huge companies buying other huge companies instead of competing with them, the "free market" is NOT simply the same thing as "The People." Corporate capitalism has the potential to be as oppressive to "The People" as the US government could ever be-- and, unlike the government, it doesn't even have any official obligation to serve our interests. Legally its main obligation is to enrich itself (or, technically, the shareholders, but the biggest shareholders are usually other corporations).

A whole lot of citizens, including many who are not "liberal," are (finally) beginning to notice how dangerous it is for our country and our world to be dominated by giant corporate entities whose wealth and power make many governments look puny. (BTW, when the federal government stops subsidizing those companies, THEN you could start to claim that there's something resembling a "free" market. But even then it wouldn't be nearly that simple.) 100 years ago, TR and many others realized that capitalism CANNOT be allowed to just "run free" without limits, because, when pushed to the limit by monopolistic power, that freedom will run roughshod over yours and mine. And it brings temporary financial "prosperity" while destroying the natural environment, the ecosystem, that we must have as a foundation for said prosperity (though we tend to forget that).

So just watch Wall Street continue to operate in a pretty much "unbridled" way, getting rich by absolutely any means possible... until, as began to happen in 2008, the whole house of cards collapses under its own weight. Then we'll see just how much poverty results from this supposed engine of prosperity. Those of you who disagree with me, and who consider yourselves to be conservative, should notice what a lot of your fellow Americans are noticing: Radical capitalism is a DANGER to truly conservative values.

neal campbell of NY 8:42AM August 07, 2011

About this blog

About this blog

Washington Whispers has been featured in U.S. News & World Report since 1933, offering a fun, insider's view of Washington.

advertisement

Latest Video

advertisement