Smithsonian Says African American Museum Will Be Different

May 17, 2011 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (12)
Early American Powder Horn, 1777. It was used during the American Revolution by a black soldier and former slave named Prince Simbo.

Early American Powder Horn, 1777. It was used during the American Revolution by a black soldier and former slave named Prince Simbo.

Among the museum's collection items is Louis Armstrong’s Selmer Trumpet, Paris, c. 1930.

Among the museum's collection items is Louis Armstrong’s Selmer Trumpet, Paris, c. 1930.

With $100 million in the bank and over 10,000 artifacts ready for display, the Smithsonian is gearing up to break ground on a new museum dedicated to African Americans next year. The National Museum of African American History and Culture comes with a $500 million price tag, half of which is being funded by the federal government, and will house, among other artifacts, Harriet Tubman’s silk shawl, a present from Queen Victoria in 1897, and a powder horn used by a former slave and black solider in the American Revolution. The museum will sit on the corner of 15th Street and Constitution Avenue, adjacent to the Washington Monument, and will be open for business in 2015, the 150th anniversary of the end of the Civil War. The Smithsonian asked Congress for $861.5 million for Fiscal Year 2012--$125 million of which would be used to construct this new museum.

Democratic Rep. Jim Moran is worried a museum dedicated to one racial or ethnic group might turn away tourists and break up the American story. But Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution Wayne Clough said the museum will make up for decades of ignoring blacks. “The Smithsonian, frankly, did not do what it should have done in the '60s, '70s and '80s to really broaden its reach to tell the more inclusive stories,” said Clough. “A lot of different groups feel they are not seen.”

Clough promises this museum won’t be like American Indian Museum, which Moran and other members of the appropriations committee find disappointing and has come under fire for being too exclusive and lacking historical depth. Lonnie Bunch, the museum’s director and central artifact hunter “has studied other museums to understand how this one can be more inclusive in its story,” said Clough. “I think we will all be positively surprised.”

Tags:
Jim Moran,
Smithsonian

Reader Comments Read all comments (12)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

what percintage of these millions are set aside for african american construction companys that oporate in the us? will the in poverty blacks across the street from this historical megalith be allowed to work there during all phases of construction. or will all of these ompteens of millions be out sorsed, and filtered to surrounding desindants of former slave owners. america would love see a gang of young african americans with brooms,shovels,wheelbarrow ect.learning and earnig. to those of higer learning with plus tener. is this to far from the black exsperiance. please respond.

Mark of TX 5:09PM January 17, 2012

The history of the descendants of Africans has long been hidden from them because of their enslavement and also because much of their history and genealogy is intertwined with those who enslaved. Those who were not enslaved brag about their ancestry and trace it back thousands of years. They have filled many libraries, museums and galleries with books about their history and exploits, carrying their search into every continent and kingdom. The Europeans, Spanish, Portuguese, British, French, Irish, Chinese, Japanese, etc., etc., etc., are prolific in praise of themselves. Therefore it is very difficult for me to understand why they want to deny the same right to persons of African descent.

In our quest for freedom and equality it has been necessary to speak of the difference in treatment between African American descendants of slaves and the treatment of the early colonialist and more recent immigrants. I note it became necessary to pass a Civil Rights Law because of violence perpetrated against African American minorities in recent history, 1964. That law now protects Americans of every color.

There is more that I want to know about my ancestors. I cried when I realized that the art work of African Americans was not included in American Art museums. That was not our choice. Neither was the violence that my people have endured.

I am grateful that the museum will be located in an area convenient to be shared and viewed by many. After all, it is OUR HISTORY also!

Elizabeth Harper (Betty) of OH 9:48PM August 18, 2011

This museum will be used as a club to brow-beat more white living Americans into feeling as though they were somehow responsible for this sad chapter in history...all in the name of the perpetual lie of 'white guilt.' Seriously, are there ANY Americans, white or otherwise, who should feel guilty for the actions of rich Southern planters 7 or more generations ago? Puh-leeze....

Shouldn't there be an African-American paid-for memorial for the hundreds of thousands who died to make sure they were freed from their bondage? OR would that be too much too ask of this pampered minority?

john of NC 7:00PM June 10, 2011

About this blog

About this blog

Washington Whispers has been featured in U.S. News & World Report since 1933, offering a fun, insider's view of Washington.

advertisement

Latest Videos

advertisement