New Laws Work to Curb Teen Abortion Rates

March 7, 2011 RSS Feed Print

A stunning new report that is sure to spur on GOP efforts in states and Washington to push for greater limits on abortion funding and availability finds that anti-abortion laws enacted since 1990 in some 34 states have helped to slash abortion rates by over 22 percent.

The report, published in the scholarly State Politics & Policy Quarterly, found "solid evidence that anti-abortion legislation has an impact on the childbearing decisions of women."

[See a gallery of political caricatures.]

Reviewing abortion data as far back as the 1960s, the report said that use of the procedure surged until the 1990s when states started enacting anti-abortion restrictions, such as requiring women to wait before having an abortion, notifying parents of teens, and cutting Medicaid expenses.

"The number of abortions that were performed consistently increased throughout the 1970s and the 1980s However, between 1990 and 2005, the number of legal abortions declined by 22.22 percent. A number of different reasons for this decline are possible. However, one factor that played a role was the increased amount of anti-abortion legislation that was passed at the state level," said the report.

[See which members of Congress get the most from pro-choice groups.]

The raw numbers attributed to the laws point to a 22 percent drop, from 1,054,719 in 1990 to 820,151 in 2005, according to the study.

Parental involvement and notification laws do seem to work to curb teen abortion rates by about 15 percent, says the study which also highlights successful programs to curb teen sex and others that encourage contraception.

[See which members of Congress get the most from pro-life groups.]

And cutting Medicaid funding is credited with reducing tax funded abortion by 9 percent.

The study also compared states with anti-abortion laws to those where the laws have been nullified, finding that those with laws on the books show a bigger decline in abortions. "The results indicate that enforced laws result in significantly larger in-state abortion declines than nullified laws," concluded the report which added that "results indicated that various types of legislation had disparate and predictable effects on different subsets of the population. For instance, parental involvement laws have a large effect on the abortion rate for minors and virtually no effect on the abortion rate for adults. These results provide further evidence that anti-abortion legislation results in declines in the number of abortions that take place within the boundaries of a given state."

The study could spark more support for legislation working its way through the House to cut off taxpayer support for abortion. One is called the "No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act," and would ban all Medicare or Medicaid money from being used to pay for abortions. The Hyde Amendment already bans federal funding of abortions, but must be reauthorized each year to stay in effect and the new act would to make the ban permanent and strengthen it. Another bill targets groups like Planned Parenthood and would bar Title X money from going to abortions.

Tags:
abortion,
Medicaid,
Medicare

Reader Comments Read all comments (3)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

What about slashing the rates of teen pregnancy? I guess that's how they came up with the idea for "16 and pregnant" or whatever it's called? That's just what we need more of-- teen mothers. Kids raised by idiots who are now raising their own kids. Why aren't they handing out condoms in school? Oh yeah, it's "offensive." Around 2022 there will be a surge in crime, when these unwanted children of teenage mothers reach about age 17.

faceThefacts of DC 7:56PM March 15, 2011

PP was the provider for approximately 1/3 of ALL the abortions in this country in 2009. Supporting an organization with MY tax dollars that does this is as good as giving them the money for the abortions themselves. If the money keeps them in business, it's paying for abortions. I'd gladly let MY portion of the 363 million TAX dollars they receive go to my community health department, because they provide THE SAME services as PP MINUS the abortions. So, I don't see what the uproar is about, since PP isn't the only place a low-income woman can go to for birth control, pap smears, or STD testing. Not only that, but PP has been shown, by way of under-cover video in more than one instance, over the course of SEVERAL years, to be willing to cover up statutory rape, and to aid and abett the trafficking of MINOR children. One woman even told the "pimp" to give blood as a way of getting tested for STD's! Why on earth should I be FORCED to pay for THAT kind of "health care"?

De-fund Planned Parenthood!

Rachel of NV 9:54PM March 07, 2011

Hello, Title X funding does not pay for abortions! It only pays for annual exams and related tests like Pap tests and birth control, things that a majority of Americans agree are a good idea. The lunatic fringe continues to harp on this "no taxpayer funding of abortion" meme, but the Hyde Amendment already forbids the use of any federal funding for abortion services. This legislation is completely pointless and acheives nothing, except it fires up the rightwing, which come to think of it is probably the whole point.

Vixen of TN 3:39PM March 07, 2011

About this blog

About this blog

Washington Whispers has been featured in U.S. News & World Report since 1933, offering a fun, insider's view of Washington.

advertisement

Latest Video

advertisement