Luntz: Voters Will Turn on Unions Next

November 8, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (5)

Congress got whacked by voters who felt they were being ignored or abused. Now it might be Big Labor's turn to face the ire of its audience: dues-paying union members. "The trend is the same," says pollster Frank Luntz. "Union employees feel their representatives just don't represent them."

Luntz's group, The Word Doctors, has completed a new poll that finds union members angry with their labor bosses over several issues. Sixty percent say it's a "wasteful and unnecessary use" of union dues to support Democrats; 72 percent say union leaders must be held more accountable; big majorities disagreed with union leaders backing health reform, Wall Street's bailout, and stimulus spending; and 52 percent said the best days of unions in America are "behind us."

And after unions spent some $53 million on Democrats in the 2010 midterms, which failed to hold off a Republican wave that put the House in GOP hands, Luntz predicts there will be a labor backlash. "They'll ask, 'How did we waste so much of our money? How did we have so little influence?' "

Luntz, who has ties to the House Republican leadership, is even suggesting that Congress probe unions' political spending, on behalf of the angry membership. "Union leaders be warned," he tells Whispers. "You are next." His idea: Hold hearings and ask union leaders why they spent political contributions from union members on candidates the members don't support. "It would give Republicans a unique and unprecedented opportunity to break bread with the union rank and file" while punishing labor bosses, says Luntz.

Not so fast, says the AFL-CIO. "Wow, this is a complete load of dribble!" barks spokesman Eddie Vale, who says that union members aren't taxed to pay for political activities, but sign up to support the political action committee COPE. "Very small amounts of dues can be used as well, but any member can exempt all of their dues from any political activity simply by checking a box on a form," he adds.

And Vale dismisses suggestions that labor bosses aren't accountable. "At the local, state, and national level, all leadership is elected by a majority vote. On the issues, the AFL-CIO's election poll found support for Democrats and demands that Republicans compromise.

Still, the survey is worrisome for labor because it parallels the election results. Angry voters broke form and even tossed out their local lawmakers.

Tags:
Democratic Party,
AFL-CIO,
Frank Luntz,
2010 Congressional elections,
labor,
Congress,
voters

Reader Comments Read all comments (5)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

How amusing. The party that screws the working man and woman every chance they get are going to attempt to "Karl Rove" the union membership. First they have to assure the unemployed workers that they will screw them re extended benefits until the millionaires and billionaires are taken care of. How stupid do they think we are?

jim riley of RI 12:46PM December 02, 2010

and you actually think your comment regarding how to automatically vote the opposite of union leaders' recommendations somehow suggests you and/or your father were/are not mindless robots??

too funny if it wasn't so sad...

mark of MA 5:56AM November 17, 2010

Every election the union "bosses" would tell everyone exactly who to vote for. So, dad would faithfully go to the polls, close the curtain, and remembering what the union guys had told him, vote for the opposite candidates. Guess you could say I was a chip off the old block, as I did the same thing throughout my years with CWA, IBEW and TWA. Guess the membership is not all a bunch of mindless robots.

Former union worker of IL 2:43PM November 14, 2010

About this blog

About this blog

Washington Whispers has been featured in U.S. News & World Report since 1933, offering a fun, insider's view of Washington.

advertisement

Latest Videos

advertisement