Election 2010 Will Make GOP More Conservative

September 13, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (4)

No matter which party has the majority in the House or Senate after Election Day, one thing is already clear: Republicans are going to be a whole bunch more conservative. "Both the House and Senate will have the feel of the House class of '94, people coming to Washington to shake things up," says former Republican Party chief Ed Gillespie.

Part of the reason is that the Tea Party movement is expected to seize many House and Senate seats. And others are likely to go to Reaganesque fiscal conservatives. "This will be something akin to Reagan's first Congress. Some in the new class will shine, some will trip, but all will be a magnifying force for the core that are there now, who are always spitting in the ocean," says GOP strategist Mary Matalin.

The picture is most stark in the Senate, where the conservative leadership of Kentucky Sen. Mitch McConnell has sometimes had to bend to the wishes of moderates to collect enough votes from the 41 Republicans in the chamber to block President Obama. McConnell realistically hopes to move up to nine new seats into the Republican column. While some of the potentially new members, like Delaware's Mike Castle, aren't right-wingers, seven Republicans who've either switched parties, lost in primaries, or are retiring all look to be replaced with far more right-leaning senators. Just consider the two sitting GOP members ousted by Tea Party candidates: Alaska's Lisa Murkowski and Utah's Bob Bennett. Their political slayers, Joe Miller and Mike Lee, are much further to the right.

"The great news is that even if we pick up only seven or eight seats, putting us at 48 or 49, we will have a 100 percent chance daily to get the magic 41 votes needed to sustain a filibuster," says a GOP strategist. And that means moderates, like Maine's Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins, can be marginalized, he added. And it will elevate the status of the two conservative Senate rabble-rousers, Jim DeMint of South Carolina and Tom Coburn of Oklahoma.

The already conservative House, meanwhile, looks to be more so after the election. One longtime adviser to congressional conservatives says it will be like having two chambers filled with allies of longtime righty Sen. Jesse Helms. "Helms was the one guy who held down the fort. Two years after he died, the reinforcements are arriving."

What's more, adds Gillespie, many new House Republicans will arrive with a built-in reelection threat: They have to cut spending, as promised, or else. "If they don't," he says, "they'll get tossed out in 2012."

Tags:
Lisa Murkowski,
Jim DeMint,
Robert Bennett,
Ed Gillespie,
Mike Castle,
Olympia Snowe,
Joe Miller,
2010 Congressional elections,
Susan Collins,
Mitch McConnell,
Congress,
Tom Coburn,
deficit and national debt,
federal budget,
Republican Party,
Barack Obama

Reader Comments Read all comments (4)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Did you hear that Dr. Jill Rowland has a shot at beating Congresswoman Louise Slaughter in November? Yes!!! Another long-time Democrat could bite-the-political dust on November 2nd! Let's do it!

Tell everyone you know, who wants Slaughter out, to pass this on to people in New York, District 28. Tell them to GET OUT AND VOTE Dr. Jill Rowland in on Nov. 2nd: http://www.jillrowlandfornewcongress.com/

HopeNJesus of NY 2:21AM October 10, 2010

Tom,

I am a staunch conservative.

I take exception to your statement, "...the thing that has to be remembered about our elected Democratic representatives in Washington is the fact that - for the most part - their hearts are in the right place. The same cannot be said for the Republicans..."

I don't think conservatives hearts are in the wrong place any more than I believe that to be true of liberals.

I think people on both extremes truely believe that they are doing what is right for the nation and the world.

The difference, as I see it, is that conservatives want smaller government and believe that the constitution is the ultimate law of the land. Liberals believe that larger government will solve society's ills and see the constitution more like a list of guidelines.

Who's right?

I can only point to the failure of liberal policies (which almost always means spending money on some program) versus the success of spending and tax cuts to help the economy prosper.

Liberals would likely argue that, "it's not just about money," and that some social ills require spending to repair damage done by bigotry or the inheirant unfairness of society. That's a reasonable argument when one is spending one's own money... but not when spending public funds.

Churches and other non-profit organizations can be funded by liberals privately, if they so choose, to fix social problems. It would be a wonderful thing should they choose to do so. However, for the good of the nation it would be best for the government to handle only those things that the constitution says it should including, "the general welfare," of the people, that is, to create an environment in which personal success is possible, even if not guaranteed. Then those non-profits can help those that truely need a hand up to get back on their feet.

Is that heartless? I'm sorry if you think so, Tom.

Brian Bennett of FL 10:24AM October 05, 2010

I get the feeling (call it a silly hunch on my part) that the American people don't fully appreciate the implications behind the prospect of the GOP taking back the House and the Senate in January. I know what you're thinking and I agree. The Democrats are beyond worthless. Let's face some serious facts here: Any party with a pathetic and befuddled old Andy Gump like Harry Reid as their leader is going to have - "issues" shall we say? But the thing that has to be remembered about our elected Democratic representatives in Washington is the fact that - for the most part - their hearts are in the right place. The same cannot be said for the Republicans, They long ago ceased being a political party. They are now an organized criminal enterprise. If that sounds to you like the extreme ramblings of an embittered Lefty, that's fine. But I am convinced that within a decade, 20/20 historical hindsight will prove me correct. Call me in ten years and we'll compare notes.

http://www.tomdegan.blogspot.com

Tom Degan

Goshen, NY

Tom Degan of NY 9:35AM September 23, 2010

About this blog

About this blog

Washington Whispers has been featured in U.S. News & World Report since 1933, offering a fun, insider's view of Washington.

advertisement

Latest Videos

advertisement