Boehner Preps to Replace Pelosi as Speaker of the House

August 9, 2010 RSS Feed Print

Two things would no doubt change if Republicans win 39 additional House seats this fall and take the majority away from the Democrats and install Ohio's John Boehner as speaker. The speaker's reception office would dump Nancy Pelosi's Ghirardelli chocolates for a tin cup of colorful "Boehner golf tees." And the House smoking ban would likely expire. Smart fashion wouldn't change much: Pelosi wears designer pantsuits, while former House Majority Leader Dick Armey calls the chain-smoking Boehner "the Dean Martin of American politics. He's so cool, every man should hate him."

PelosiBohner.Boehner and other GOPers say there would be lots of other changes. Committee chairs would get more authority, legislating would open up to both parties, and the speaker's iron fist would be swapped for something a bit softer.

Boehner has served under four speakers, been booted from leadership after a coup attempt on Newt Gingrich, and staged a comeback to be the top House Republican in 2006. "I've got a pretty good handle on how I would do this job," says Boehner, who broke the model by campaigning with his own "Boehner for Speaker" brochure. "Newt [Gingrich] used to have this management saying on a wall in his office: 'Listen, learn, help, and lead.' And it really encapsulates a management strategy that I've used for many years."

California Rep. Kevin McCarthy, who's drafting the GOP's latest Contract With America, says, "Losing has taught him to be a much better leader."

FreedomWorks Chairman Armey, now a Tea Party movement leader, says Boehner is perfectly suited to take the helm of a party being revived by fiscal conservatives. He recalls, for example, that Boehner was part of the 1990s "Gang of Seven" that tried to limit earmarks. "I think this movement will become more of a working support group and a cheering section for what will be the natural volitions of the new Republican majority," says Armey.

There's also hope for a bipartisanship resurgence, since Boehner has a history of teaming with lawmakers like the late Sen. Ted Kennedy. "We're not going to be able to solve the big problems in our country until members begin to work with each other again and trust each other once again," he says. "And it isn't going to happen overnight."

Of course, Democrats aren't buying it. "Few can make the case better about the dangers of turning back the clock to a Republican Congress than Republican Leader John Boehner," warns Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee spokesman Ryan Rudominer.

Illustration by Ed Wexler for USN&WR.

Tags:
Kevin McCarthy,
Dick Armey,
Nancy Pelosi,
John Boehner,
Newt Gingrich

Reader Comments Read all comments (6)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

The title says it all Larry doesn't want to admitt he is wrong. Most Americans wouldn't agree with him, heck the truth doesn't agree with him, but he doesn't want to see the truth.

D from NC of NC 11:26AM August 10, 2010

Nothing is stopping you from "cheerfully would contribute to getting this country out of the hole", send the feds your money if you want it to go to waste. There is nothing stopping you or anyone else from sending more than you owe.

I for one believe that hard working Americans should keep the money they earn. Question, how on earth did the feds do anything before 1909 & the 16th Amendment?

I 100% support The FairTax Act (HR 25, S 296)

, talk about giving both parties a vested interest in making sure this economy is robust.

http://www.fairtax.org/site/PageServer

BTW, Trickle-Down Baloney worked for this poor white kid from the Mid-West, but of course I had to apply myself and do a lot of work. Funny how that works.

Larry of CA 2:15PM August 09, 2010

All that "trickling down" did not happen before. The tax cuts for the rich this time did not keep us from the most major recession in my long lifetime.

It's not class warfare. It is fairness, collecting taxes from those who can afford it - those who benefitted most from any wealth out there, letting those who are poor be able to continue renting their little apartment, it's acknowledging that the money never got to the public.

A few years after the tax cuts you love, our economy is in ruins - That is not a poster child for why to do it again. I have money, and cheerfully contribute to the well-being of society as a whole. It benefits me in the end too.

Tax cuts did not increase revenues, other aspects of the economy did that. Cutting interest rates to stimulate purchases and consumer buying binges - that's what got folks to buy more, sell more, employ more and thus collect more taxes. Not the tax cuts. Trust me. I lived in California, and watched the Reagan philsophy tank things there. No revenues, but spending anyway.

Truth is, the economy had a lot higher tax rate during the Reagan years, and the country was just fine, also during the Clinton years (GHW Bush actually was smart enough to raise taxes -the voters were dumb).

Allowing the Bush tax cut to expire would bring aroun $600-$700 billion to the budget. Less deficit. Less debt. Fiscally responsible. I remember when the GOP stood for that - but no more. I was a Republican then. Now it is for those who are selfish, owned by corporations, not willing to pay for their wars or missiles or border walls....and obviously can't count or balance a budget.

Amazing how some rich people never have enough money. And they don't want anyone else to have it. I'm in the 28% bracket, but cheerfully would contribute to getting this country out of the hole. No more smoke and mirrors - Larry. Milton Friedman dried up when we took interest rates to zero. Now we are going to use Keynes. T = tax. Get used to it.

DeeToo of SC 1:50PM August 09, 2010

About this blog

About this blog

Washington Whispers has been featured in U.S. News & World Report since 1933, offering a fun, insider's view of Washington.

advertisement

Latest Video

advertisement