Some Worry McChrystal Gaffe Will End Embed Program

June 23, 2010 RSS Feed Print

Ousted Gen. Stanley McChrystal's locker room banter with a Rolling Stone reporter about the president and his national security staff could lead the military to end the successful program of embedding reporters with the troops.

Two public relations experts schooled in Washington's ways, former CIA spokesman Bill Harlow and former NBC correspondent Fred Francis, are urging military officials not to react by staying away from the press or junking the military embedding program. On their 15-Seconds.com blog, the two long-time Washington hands say that "It is unfortunate—but likely—that many military and government officials will learn the wrong lesson from the damage done by McChrystal's Improvised Explosive Remarks. The predictable result is that senior officials will shy away from all contact with the media." [See photos of U.S. troops in Afghanistan.]

But, they argue, that junking the embed program and barring reporters from talking to military officials would be a mistake. "Lengthy embeds are helpful for reporters working with military combat units on the ground—but perhaps not such a good idea for socializing with senior staff as they discuss policy matters that are above their pay grades," they wrote.

In fact, the duo suggest that the McChrystal case could become a classic case for future military leaders to use when teaching officers when and how to handle reporters. One lesson: Don't gab over beers in bars. [Read 10 Things You Didn't Know About Stanley McChrystal.]

"Some have observed that many of the comments seemed to have been made in unguarded moments at bars and restaurants. Who knew there was such a vibrant bar scene in Kabul? Some of McChrystal's views might even be accurate-but it is hard to find anyone today who thinks they are wise. The betting here is that McChrystal will have plenty more free time to visit bars and restaurants after his meeting at the White House," say Francis and Harlow.

Another lesson: See if a reporter has an angle he's chasing. They note that the Rolling Stone reporter had a track record of highlighting the troubled relations between war commanders and the administration. "That might have been an indication of where [the reporter's] mind was at," they blogged.

Tags:
Stanley McChrystal

Reader Comments Read all comments (3)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

McChrystal's comments to RS were planned and purposeful.

Weldy of MD 12:39AM June 24, 2010

The anointed one: "Now is the time for all of us to come together."

America to POTUS: Yeah, like you and your lackeys have been engaged in that so far. We've got some news for you: we are coming together. You'll get the full memo in November. You have our word on it. We saw Biden standing at the podium. Did he say, "This is f_ _ king huge?" Oh, BTW, we caught Rahm lying. His lips were moving. Fire him too.

America of CA 5:17PM June 23, 2010

As coordinator of a media coalition for openness in government, I'd argue that the biggest loser is the public if military and other government officials decide the risks are too high to allow journalists in. McChrystal was fundamentally right about one thing. This was an error in judgment. It's one thing to say the things that he and his staff did. It's quite another to do so in front of a reporter with no ground rules set out that these comments should be off the record.

If sources shut out journalists, the public loses out on the view from inside on whatever policy matter is relevant -- war, oil spill response, the latest negotiations on the Hill.

Rick Blum

Coordinator, Sunshine in Government Initiative

Rick Blum of MD 3:37PM June 23, 2010

About this blog

About this blog

Washington Whispers has been featured in U.S. News & World Report since 1933, offering a fun, insider's view of Washington.

advertisement

Latest Video

advertisement