Kagan Calls Israeli Activist Judge 'My Hero'

Reader Comments
Back to blog

Rabbi Yehuda Levin, spokesman for the alliance, told CNSNews.com on Thursday that "a great deal has been made about the fact that she would be the second Jewish woman on the court, and we want to signal to people across the country that we take no pride in this.”"We feel that Elena Kagan turns traditional
Judaism on its head – from a concept of a nation of priests and holy people, she is turning it into, ‘Let’s homosexualize every segment of society. And by the way, partial-birth babies have no right to be delivered.’" “It is clear from Ms. Kagan's record on issues such as abortion-on-demand, partial-birth-abortion, the radical homosexual and lesbian agenda, the "supremacy" of the anti-family panoply over religious liberties of biblical adherents, et. al., that she will function as a flame-throwing radical, hastening society's already steep decline into Sodom and Gomorrah,” the rabbis said in the statement.

Ira of CA 10:42AM June 27, 2010

Kagan will prove to be a real bitch and will inflame the tempers and try the patience of the majority of USA citizens.

R.F. Monaco of FL 7:40PM June 26, 2010

Just ask her the simple question will you stand in support of this country which embodies the "True American" meaning true citizens of many generations and the American who's fathers and brothers and sisters fought teranny not the freeloading people that are rushing our borders. Let's see how she answers?

Joe kuehn of FL 12:51PM June 25, 2010

I would do her in a minute! Oh, and Ginsburg too. Ooh, yeh, what an awesome threesome that would make.

Bill Clinton of NY 3:56AM June 25, 2010

Kagan is a governmentalist,which is the worst type of a judge.Liberals and Conservatives can both rule for the the government,not protect indivdual rights specified in the Constitution.She is a politicial animal and a creature of academia.That means she has no feel for rights just citizen's duties.The government believes that gun owners are a threat to government,not a constutional right. Kagan is right in there as a cheerleader for expansive governmental powers. Her position on The Freedom of Information Act shows her support for secrecy-an escape hatch to permit government to violate our rights. Her defense of President Clinton's conduct in office shows she is a person without discipline or standards. Character matters on the bench.Resisting the temptation to make law on the bench requires discipline. Let's see what standards the Senate has in the confirmation hearings.

Walter W. Stern of WI 10:40PM June 24, 2010

Its me again, you anti-semite. And again you have not a clue as to what "Rabinical Philosophy" is, and I repeat keep talking at least your entertaining.

Goerge of CT 10:15PM June 24, 2010

The ridiculous lack of moral and ethical propriety of this nominee is systemic.
The shameless absence of even any sense of propriety in both the Obama's nomination of a Jewish candidate for this high office, to sit on the nine-justice bench with two other Jewish justices, has only been surpassed by the candidate herself -who shows no more shame than the classless Obama -who nominated yet another Jew -apparently- to hideously laud like Gods over all the mere non-Jews.
Elena Kagan now has the asinine audacity to praise an Israeli judge as her "hero". This social climber from Harvard has never contributed anything to this country. She has only taken, taken and continued to take.
This reflects badly -not just on Obama and Kagan though. The law is in such poor shape in this country, we don't need a Jewish law academic. We need justices who represent and can relate to the population in the country.
Kagan does not fit the bill.
This utter lack common propriety reflects most gravely upon Harvard University -who paid Ms Kagan nearly a half million dollars a year to impress impressionable young, up and coming Harvard students at the School of Law with her unseemly Jewish license to act with both moral and ethical impropriety far beyond the bounds of our moral humanity.
The rabbinical philosophy that Kagan knows -is a crude and belligerent excuse for rank and barbaric militarism at best. At its worst, it is the moral relativism of the Existentialists proclaiming like the Cole Porter tune, "Anything goes!"
Anything goes as long as it favors colonialist European Jews who do not seem to fit in with the neighbors they picked in the Middle East. So, those European Jews have waged a sixty year war of ethnic cleansing and land theft.
That is WHAT Elena Kagan admires.
The moral imperative of life is to live a life that detracts not at all from the lives available to those who will follow us into this world.
We are being asked here with this nomination to differentiate between the future of the rest of the world, and the future of Jews for some immoral reason. That is the truth.
Where do these moral thoughts fit in -in the perspective of what we are seeing unfold here -in our world? -in our country? and by this obscene nomination of a third Jewish SCOTUS justice?
No.
One Jewish justice on the Supreme Court in more than enough if we look at the demographics of the choice. Two has all the appearance of impropriety. Three is simply obscene and beyond all reason -moral or logical.
Emigrate to Israel, Elena Kagan. There you can laud over the Palestinians as if THEY were non-human.
Here in the US, your nomination only denigrates all Jews.
Don Robertson, Limestone, Maine

Don Robertson of ME 5:36PM June 24, 2010

I would agree with your talking point indictments if they had any depth beyond the headline approach to scare. A deeper look at the issues paints an entirely different equation.
The executive branch has no authority to order private companies. That is the truth. Please show where you find that authority given to the executive branch. It doesn't exist. Simply because in this particular situation you agree the the decision (however imperialistic it may be) coming from that office, does not mean the president has the right to order. If he really wants to accomplish, then he can go through the methods available to him as the people's representative as outlined in his job description. By the way, that document is called the Constitution.
Judges have no right to create remedies. They have a right and a responsibility to rule on a remedy as designed by attorneys, aggrieved parties, other courts, juries and government bodies. And thank God for those rules in place, This way no one man can devise some outrageous rule or remedy and hold the population hostage to it.
Allowing the executive branch to label anyone or anything a terrorist organization and taking away their rights is a scary thought. But this is a liberal mechanization the Obama administration would love to use against any group who dares have the audacity to speak out against them.

Tim of CA 3:28PM June 24, 2010

This should be of no surprise. Now we will have a third radical Zionist butch a six Catholics to forge our new laws.

robertsgt40 of TX 12:22PM June 24, 2010

To Jean in Pa.-
Replace the name with GW and the game is the same. We all face a problem with government and politics, but please drop the Fox-like rhetoric and come out of the bunker to talk.

Joe D. of ME 11:09AM June 24, 2010