Weekly Standard Profile Building Mitch Daniels 2012 Buzz

Reader Comments
Back to blog

On 2 screens, I explained why Ban-Abortion churches must not be tolerated. They exist to make women create church benefactors. They create millions of job-seekers who accept low pay to avoid starvation & eviction. JD says Californians should be moral, take care of themselves & not rely on government to always bail them out. A couple can be very moral when they decide what size family they can support with their own labor. But he doesn't want them to be helped to GET AN ABORTION so they won't need welfare. California attracts lots of welfare people because it gives the highest subsidy for poor unwed moms & kids & for the disabled and elderly. Our state is like England in the era of Dickens. Catholic Ireland banned abortion, so when Catholic Irish servant girls "got into trouble" they escaped shame by moving to England. They had their babies in charity hospitals & adopted them out, passing their problem to others. Their addition to population dragged wages down for boys like Dickens described. England had lots of its own Catholic subjects. They obeyed the pope, adding to welfare & poverty. It is amoral to let the cells of unwanted, unsupported conceptions continue to divide. Abortion is the ethical, moral solution.

auradawn veirs of CA 4:13AM June 21, 2010

I feel sorry for Auradawn of California. To believe that to murder innocent life is the answer. It is ironic that He/She resides in California. The most socialist of all states. How's that working out for you? Here in Indiana I am so thankful for a true conservative republican Governor! We are not in debt and will not have to go on bended knee to the alter of Obama. I truely hope Mitch runs for president in 2012!!! Maybe if more Californians valued life and led a more moral life and took care of themselves and their families and did't rely on the government to always bail them out, they'd be in alot better shape.

T. Devens of IN 2:19AM June 21, 2010

It costs us taxpayers $500,000 to subsidize one poor unwed mom and one kid to age l8. We get stuck with even more Big Goverhment when we pay people to hand out the food stamps, ADC, welfare, health care, & subsidized lunches & housing. We heed taxpaid contraception, voluntary sterilization & abortion. Abortion is cheap.. To teh weeks, it costs $527. To 6 weeks, $735. To the end it still costs only $1370. Compare that with $500,000 to aid religious people who refuse to abort because they're told it's a sin that sends them to hell. To let them "practice their religion," Congress borrows money to finance all that welfare. We're forced to keep careless breeders happy. To do that, Congress makes us pay interest, so we are also subsidizing family members of bankers. Ban-Abortion churches must not be tolerated. They must be exposed and blamed for their role in driving taxes higher every year.

auradawn veirs of CA 4:42PM June 19, 2010

Web search has Daniels saying he's personally ProLife. Ban-Abortionists scare & disgust people with ads pretending an early-stage embryo is as big as a piglet. In fact, much of the weight of a conception is amniotic fluid. It takes a while for an embryo to divide enough so the cells fill a teabag. Prolife tells people "Don't murder millions of innocent unborn babies." The lies work. Millions of conceptions were not aborted. They lived, grew, and got out of school. They now compete with parents, siblings and illegals for the few jobs left in the USA. Prolifers are in both parties. They want church income by forcing women to have big families to replace church benefactors who die or lose faith. The ten per cent lifetime tithe is a lot of money. If a person pays ten per cent on a yearly $40,000 income for 20 years, that's $80,000. For the same reason (church income) Prolife bans suicide..corpses don't tithe. Obama is ProChoice. During his campaign, I heard is wife on TV say two children are enough for them. They set a good example. Ban-Abortionists like Daniels make us taxpayers subsidize a poor unwed mom and one kid to age l8, and that costs us $500,000. But see next posting for how cheap abortion is in the USA.

auradawn veirs of CA 4:14PM June 19, 2010

I voted for Obama and Mitch. He is a fiscally responsible Gov. and true leader.
As a former Goldwater Republican who switched to Obama Mitch is a great move by the party to get its crediblity back.
Don't think they can pull it off-to many wing nuts running the party.

Robert Wang of IN 9:37PM June 11, 2010

Since all the major candidates being talked up for the Republican 2012 nomination have some downside, I fully expect 2012 to be the year the Republicans have an obscure, Bill Clinton-type candidate become their nominee. So Mitch Daniels is a completely plausible potential candidate.

Kevin S. of OH 5:34PM June 11, 2010