Weekly Standard Profile Building Mitch Daniels 2012 Buzz

June 10, 2010 RSS Feed Print

By Paul Bedard, Washington Whispers

There’s no question that Mitch Daniels fever is starting to grow in Washington as Republicans look for a proven manager with corporate experience to run against President Obama in 2012. While saying he’s not interested in running, the two-term Indiana governor and former Reagan and George W. Bush aide who was also an Eli Lilly & Company exec has been taking the standard steps toward testing the presidential waters.

Among the moves was his interview with and subsequent long profile in the current Weekly Standard. Smartly written by senior editor Andrew Ferguson, the 8,700-word piece was a walk through Daniels’ life and political style, much of which is known.

But it’s the two paragraphs of “opposition research” near the end revealing his “happy endings” marriage that has many of those supporting him in Washington buzzing. The reason: They didn’t know that he and his wife had divorced then fairly quickly remarried. Daniels calls it the perfect love story in the excerpt below, though his supporters don’t know what to make of it other than to say congratulations for keeping the family together.

Here’s what Ferguson wrote:

When the oppo researchers and the national press do get around to opening up Daniels’s life for inspection, they will find a few embarrassments. One is his arrest in 1970 for marijuana possession when he was a student at Princeton. He spent two nights in jail and paid a $350 fine, and later wrote about the bust in a column for the Star in 1989. More painfully, he and his wife Cheri divorced in 1994. She moved to California, leaving Daniels with the four daughters, aged 8 to 14, and married a doctor. She divorced again and moved back to Indiana. She and Mitch remarried in 1997.

Cheri has never spoken about this publicly, and from what I can tell it’s been mentioned in print only twice. Daniels’s only comment was to the Indianapolis Star in 2004: ‘If you like happy endings, you’ll love our story.’

 

Tags:
Mitch Daniels,
Weekly Standard,
Barack Obama,
2012 presidential election

Reader Comments Read all comments (7)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

On 2 screens, I explained why Ban-Abortion churches must not be tolerated. They exist to make women create church benefactors. They create millions of job-seekers who accept low pay to avoid starvation & eviction. JD says Californians should be moral, take care of themselves & not rely on government to always bail them out. A couple can be very moral when they decide what size family they can support with their own labor. But he doesn't want them to be helped to GET AN ABORTION so they won't need welfare. California attracts lots of welfare people because it gives the highest subsidy for poor unwed moms & kids & for the disabled and elderly. Our state is like England in the era of Dickens. Catholic Ireland banned abortion, so when Catholic Irish servant girls "got into trouble" they escaped shame by moving to England. They had their babies in charity hospitals & adopted them out, passing their problem to others. Their addition to population dragged wages down for boys like Dickens described. England had lots of its own Catholic subjects. They obeyed the pope, adding to welfare & poverty. It is amoral to let the cells of unwanted, unsupported conceptions continue to divide. Abortion is the ethical, moral solution.

auradawn veirs of CA 4:13AM June 21, 2010

I feel sorry for Auradawn of California. To believe that to murder innocent life is the answer. It is ironic that He/She resides in California. The most socialist of all states. How's that working out for you? Here in Indiana I am so thankful for a true conservative republican Governor! We are not in debt and will not have to go on bended knee to the alter of Obama. I truely hope Mitch runs for president in 2012!!! Maybe if more Californians valued life and led a more moral life and took care of themselves and their families and did't rely on the government to always bail them out, they'd be in alot better shape.

T. Devens of IN 2:19AM June 21, 2010

It costs us taxpayers $500,000 to subsidize one poor unwed mom and one kid to age l8. We get stuck with even more Big Goverhment when we pay people to hand out the food stamps, ADC, welfare, health care, & subsidized lunches & housing. We heed taxpaid contraception, voluntary sterilization & abortion. Abortion is cheap.. To teh weeks, it costs $527. To 6 weeks, $735. To the end it still costs only $1370. Compare that with $500,000 to aid religious people who refuse to abort because they're told it's a sin that sends them to hell. To let them "practice their religion," Congress borrows money to finance all that welfare. We're forced to keep careless breeders happy. To do that, Congress makes us pay interest, so we are also subsidizing family members of bankers. Ban-Abortion churches must not be tolerated. They must be exposed and blamed for their role in driving taxes higher every year.

auradawn veirs of CA 4:42PM June 19, 2010

About this blog

About this blog

Washington Whispers has been featured in U.S. News & World Report since 1933, offering a fun, insider's view of Washington.

advertisement

Latest Video

advertisement