Could FDA Panel Conflict of Interest Endanger Menthol Cigarettes?

June 9, 2010 RSS Feed Print

By Paul Bedard, Washington Whispers

At least four groups are now questioning the credibility of a federal advisory panel created to study tobacco product safety, challenging two members with financial ties to drug firms that make smoking cessation products. At issue: Will the duo push to ban menthol ciggys and favor smokeless products?

The issue hit this week when the Center for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, or CREW, filed a complaint against the FDA's tobacco advisory panel for conflicts of interest since they have voting members who consult for pharmaceutical companies that work on nicotine delivery products to quit smoking.

The concern is that two members, Jack Henningfield and Neal Benowitz, have an incentive to favor smoking cessation products because they've advised drug firms on those products.

"This creates an obvious incentive for these members to ban menthol in cigarettes and create a multi-billion dollar market for more nicotine patches and gum potentially paid for by taxpayers," says a critic. The menthol issue the advisory committee is considering is huge: Menthol cigarettes make up about one third of the cigarette market and eliminating them would likely shift users to smokeless products, say industry officials.

The FDA has rejected previous conflict charges and Benowitz told the New York Times this week:  "My involvement with pharmaceutical companies is aimed at reducing the risk of smoking, quitting smoking. The aim of the committee is also to reduce the adverse health consequences of tobacco use."

Besides the left-leaning CREW, the three other opposition groups are the Altria Group, the American Council on Science and Health, and the right-leaning Americans for Limited Government.

Bill Wilson of Americans for Limited Government said that having his and CREW oppose the two appointees on the panel shows how much of a concern there is.

"The odds may be greater of drawing a royal flush in poker than us agreeing on anything but we both know you the FDA shouldn't have a stacked deck when playing with the taxpayers' money," he said. "However, two groups as disparate as ours, Americans for Limited Government, and CREW agree the FDA tobacco panel can't possibly have a legitimate review of the science surrounding menthol's use in cigarettes with multiple conflicts of interest by many of the panelists."

Tags:
smoking and tobacco,
FDA

Reader Comments Read all comments (8)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

If you ban menthol cigarettes you would have to ban menthol itself i know for a fact that one could take an open pack of non menthol cigarettes and place them in a plastic bag that contains menthol and the next day you would have menthol cigarettes. Try it and with any other band flavor that is as volatile as menthol.

Gary Shelar of NC 9:04AM July 21, 2010

I started smoking at the age of 21. If it weren't for someone handing me a menthol cigarette, I would not have smoken for 20 years and I would not have emphazema. If banning menthol cigarettes can save even a small percent of people from diseases associated with smoking be them black or white, I say ban them!

As for the advertising, I'm sure these companies don't necessarily ask their customers what race they are but it doesn't take an idiot to collect info from other sources in order to do heavy advertising! Next time you walk down the street, take note of all the black people who smoke...what kind of cigarette are they smoking...I'd say 9 out of 10 are smoking a menthol. Why? IDK but if I worked for these cigarette companies in their advertising dept, I'd find out what area's were densly populated with blacks and advertise it to death...it is all about business and making money! I bet more than 90% of people who work for these cigarette companies don't smoke and to them it's about bringing home a paycheck at the end of the week.

Adding more tax to the cigarettes will only make an addicted person pay more money. Where exactly is all this extra tax going? I have finally quit smoking after many failed attempts. Cigarettes cost $2.00 a pack when I started and $8.75 when I quit~i kept paying the increases because I was ADDICTED. So again I ask, where is all this extra tax money going?

Cookie of NY 11:16PM July 20, 2010

Hey if they get rid of menthol I won't smoke anymore so it will make america healthier

james smith of AK 9:42PM July 14, 2010

About this blog

About this blog

Washington Whispers has been featured in U.S. News & World Report since 1933, offering a fun, insider's view of Washington.

advertisement

Latest Video

advertisement