Anti-Abortion Group Seeks Kagan Hearing Delay

Reader Comments
Back to blog

Roe vs wade is not a law it is a case that has set precedent so it can't be repealed. Also, your knowledge of congregations show that you have no clue what goes on in a church, you should try going once it may change your mind, and shouldn't cost you a dime unless you find it in your caring, giving, liberal heart to give it on your own. Classic case of liberals ruling from the bench.

Leroy of NC 10:51AM May 25, 2010

"Until l973, the government did prevent Americans from having safe, timely abortions."
In reality, abortion was under purview of STATE governments until 1973--Roe v Wade (which was based on a case as contrived as Nation Of Islam's many lawsuits against Denny's) pulled it into federal purview, INVENTING a "right" which was never defined in Constitution.
"If preaching were free, Pro-LIfe would not exist."
Last-i-checked, there are many non-Christians (South Indian Hindus, Bangla Muslims, ...) who are pro-life (and who practically by-definition have no contact with Christian preachings)--as in reality, pro-life stems from God-created conscience (which the poster from Californication has suppressed and seared long ago--else she would not be able to post such rubbish).

Devasahayam of VA 7:25PM May 24, 2010

Ban-abortion churches do not trust members to willingly produce big families that take the place of tithers who die or lose faith. So they insist our civil government must enforce church laws that ban abortion & suicide. Until l973, the government did prevent Americans from having safe, timely abortions. That 1973 vote was Roe v Wade. Pro-Lifers want to repeal it. They say each conception has potential to live & become a believer who will pay the huge ten per cent lifetime tithe, plus church fees & costs of church school. If a person pays l0 per cent of an annual income of $40,000, for 20 years, that's $80.000. If that person pays $10,000 more for other costs of worship, that means one conception can be worth $90,000 to church employees. I have never seen or heard Pro-Lifers say "For Potential Tithers, Life Begins at Conception." Pro-Life is not for "innocent fetal life." It is for the dollar value of faithful dues-paying congregations. The nominee has a deep record of dealing with Constitutional law. She is attacked to protect everyone who makes a living from religion. Aborted conceptions & suicided bodies can't pay churches any money. If preaching were free, Pro-LIfe would not exist.

aURa dawn veirs of CA 3:21PM May 24, 2010

Anything as important as the Supreme Court demands an INFORMED vote in the Senate, if there is such a thing anymore. Thank you to AUL for their leadership on this issue.

Joan of WI 1:59PM May 24, 2010