10 Problems With the Income Tax

April 12, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (19)

By Paul Bedard, Washington Whispers

With it getting to be Tax Day, April 15, then it's time for the anti-tax brigade to start the chant: Kill the tax code. Leading the rally this year is Ken Hoagland, who is chairman of the Online Tax Revolt and who just penned The FairTax Solution.

His idea is to trade income taxes for consumption taxes. Fix taxes, he tells us, "or rip it out by the roots and replace it." In advance of Tax Day, he wrote up for Whispers his 10 biggest complaints with the income tax:

1. It's too complicated. Even a degree in rocket science won't save you from 67,500 pages of all but indecipherable tax code regulations. It confuses the IRS, the secretary of treasury and even the former chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee. It's an annual nightmare that has spawned a tax industry based on complexity created by our own government.

2. It's too expensive. The complexity of the code costs a lot of money—more than $310 billion last year on the paperwork alone. Small businesses often pay more in paperwork expenses than the taxes they pay. Can any law be just, much less efficient, that costs so much to obey?

3. It's unfair. Income is commonly double and triple taxed, married people pay higher rates than singles living together and Congress' mistake in failing to index the Alternative Minimum Tax for inflation now threatens to define as "wealthy" those with as little as $80,000 a year in income. How just can a tax be that rewards those who hide income either here or offshore or have tax lobbyists to broker special deals?

4. It damages the economy. Income taxes are levied on work, savings, and investments. In essence, the government grows by taking money from what makes the economy grow. Such a system retards capital formation, job growth, and a higher savings rate and, as such, stymies economic growth or recovery.

5. It's been corrupted. More than a billion dollars a year is spent lobbying the tax code. Congress has sold off two to three tax breaks a day every day they've been in session for the last 20 years. It makes Congressmen powerful and lobbyists rich and creates a tax system with more loopholes than Swiss cheese. It's very lucrative for those in Washington and very bad for those without a lobbyist.

6. It undermines American companies. Foreign governments often forgo domestic taxes on products for sale overseas. American companies don't get that break and carry the second highest corporate tax rate in the world, employee FICA taxes, and significant tax compliance costs as the cost of doing business here. It puts the "Made in America" label at a significant producer price disadvantage and drives jobs overseas.

7. It hides the cost of government. Taxes are withheld from paychecks, hiding from plain sight the cost of federal spending and its relationship to our own earnings. For many Americans, federal spending mistakenly seems like "free money." The resulting tenuous connection between personal wealth and government profligacy allows politicians to promise more and more from the Treasury to win elections and satisfy their own political ambitions. That's destructive.

8. It's intrusive. Once upon a time it was no one's business how much money we made or how we spent it. Today it is the right and duty of the federal government to track every penny we earn, save, or spend. It has created a system where every business decision is weighed against tax consequences and where pastors are told what they can and can't say from the pulpit to keep their non-profit status.

9. It hurts consumers and workers. Business taxes don't come out of CEO's personal accounts but are paid for by consumers when taxes are "embedded" in wholesale and retail prices. When competition with foreign producers won't allow a higher price point to cover taxes, employee's wages and benefits take the hit.

10. It makes us into modern day serfs. We get what's left over in our paychecks after the federal government has taken its share. That means the fruits of our labors belong first to our government. That's backwards and not at all what the Founding Father's had in mind.

For more, check out his site and www.fairtax.com or his book The FairTax Solution.

Tags:
income tax

Reader Comments Read all comments (19)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

If taxation was fair, no one would be complaining. FDR asked the country to share in the fight and share in the prosperity. We could use a leader like FDR again. We can thank FDR for an extended period of egalitarian prosperity - across the board Americans did well.

Our current problem has been the GOP constantly trying to roll beck a well regulated economy that we all benefited from following WWII. The trouble now is not FDR's reforms, but the Republican efforts to overturn those reforms that kept the crooks at bay. We can thank the reactionary Republicans who crashed our economy for constantly trying to deregulate. The GOP are to blame for the past decade where prosperity came to a halt for most Americans except the greediest among us. We can thank snakes like Phil Gramm overturning Glass-Steagal and giving Enron special perks.

We need to put back reforms on wall street FDR put in place like the Glass-Steagal act.

Jerry of TX 3:04PM April 19, 2010

Thank you Scott Richardson of WA for pointing out the WWII connection to our current income tax. The 1942 victory tax became the 1944 income tax that constantly grew and mutated into what we now know today.

"The Victory Tax of 1942

In 1939 only about five percent of American workers paid income tax. The United States' entrance into World War II changed that figure. The demands of war production put almost every American back to work, but the expense of the war still exceeded tax-generated revenue. President Roosevelt's proposed Revenue Act of 1942 introduced the broadest and most progressive tax in American history, the Victory Tax. Now, about 75 percent of American workers would pay income taxes. Because so many citizens paid the tax, it was considered a mass tax. To ease workers' burden of paying a large sum once a year, and to create a regular flow of revenue into the U.S. Treasury, the government required employers to withhold money from employees' paychecks. Additional taxes were put in place in 1943. By war's end in 1945, about 90 percent of American workers submitted income tax forms, and 60 percent paid taxes on their income. The federal government covered more than half its expenses with new income tax revenue."

http://www.irs.gov/app/understandingTaxes/teacher/whys_thm02_les05.jsp

WWII ended and its continuing legacy is the income tax.

It's no coincidence that Congress hasn't issued a real declaration of war since WWII. They don't HAVE to as a pre-requisite to then formulate and legislate a war ('victory') tax of limited duration to finance the declared war -- they already have the revenue-generating vehicle, the income tax via employer withholding, in place.

And even though that is the case, it STILL isn't enough money for Congress to pander both welfare and warfare as the mounting federal debt evidences.

For those arguing regressive-progressive whatevers -- because of that Bush-bad/Obama-good bug so willingly stuck so far up their behinds -- you don't know the intertwined history of the income tax and warfare/massive federal debt, how the two are inseparable, historically and to date, nor do you grasp how the 1935 payroll tax for social security paved the way for the 1942 'victory' tax.

It boils down to this: Anyone arguing against getting rid of the income tax is arguing FOR the two current undeclared wars AND the trillions of new federal debt being racked up as we speak.

Before anyone else argues 'progressivity' or 'fairness' read up on how we got to where we are, bogged down in two ongoing wars and trillions in federal debt. Here's a start:

http://www.cato.org/pubs/journal/cj14n3-1.html

Perhaps after some understand how the current income tax system came about via WWII, the Bush-and-GOP-bad/Obama-and-Dems-good bug may end up falling out of their behinds all on its own, and they will clearly see both the retail republicans and democrats as tag-team con artists.

dom youngross of OH 5:05PM April 15, 2010

Regarding #8 "where pastors are told what they can and can't say from the pulpit to keep their non-profit status." While I agree with many of the author's arguments, I absolutely disagree with his seeming assertion that churches should be able to endorse candidates and engage in other political activities. Public politics should have no place in a House of Worship. This is what the principle of separation of church and state is about.

Charles of TX 3:54PM April 15, 2010

About this blog

About this blog

Washington Whispers has been featured in U.S. News & World Report since 1933, offering a fun, insider's view of Washington.

advertisement

Latest Videos

advertisement