Public Doesn’t Blame Bush Tax Cuts for Deficit

April 2, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (10)

By Paul Bedard, Washington Whispers

If rumors that the administration is eyeing a 3 percent tax slapped on everything but food are true, a new poll finds that a European-style value added tax would be DOA. A new Democratic poll, from Democracy Corps, puts a VAT near the bottom of choices Americans like as a solution to reduce the out of control federal deficit.

Of 14 choices given, the 3 percent tax ranks 11th. Some 57 percent oppose it, 42 percent strongly, and 40 percent favor the VAT, just 17 percent strongly. That finding is much wider than the overall view of Americans toward paying more taxes to fund the deficit. Overall, the nation is split, with 48 percent saying they can't afford higher taxes and 47 percent ready to write a check.

Interestingly, the public doesn't blame the Bush tax cuts for the deficit like most Democrats do. The largest group at 36 percent blame the wars for the growing deficits. Last on blame list are the Bush tax cuts, with just 9 percent. That could make it more difficult for the Democrats to end the tax cuts starting this fall, say Republicans.

Talk about a VAT was sidelined as the administration fought for and won healthcare reform. Aides worried that people would think the VAT would pay for the reforms. Now that the healthcare package has passed, there has been renewed talk about a VAT, enough so that Democracy Corps included it in their deficit poll conducted jointly with Tulane University.

Tags:
deficit and national debt,
taxes

Reader Comments Read all comments (10)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

The 47% who would "write a check" for the increase wouldn't be writing tax checks because they don't pay any tax.

JOHN of FL 5:52PM May 14, 2010

The first, and only, defense offered by our friends on the left regarding Federal spending is to pretend that Bush's deficit spending rivaled Obama's. To which the honest answer is: Not hardly! Check out the inconvenient graph to show the relationship: http://tinyurl.com/yc4ngs3

We're already facing a $12 Trillion deficit; the CBO projects it at $20 Trillion by 2020 at the rate that Obama and Congress are saddling us with deby.

Inconvenient fact number two: if you taxed "the rich" at 100% -- that is, confiscated all their money -- it wouldn't run the Federal government for a week. The commenter, above, whining that the "top richest 1% own almost 50% of the nation's financial wealth" conveniently forgets that the top 1% also pay more income tax than the bottom 90%. And a recent news article notes that about 47% of households -- including families making as much as $50,000 -- will pay NO Federal income taxes at all for 2009. Are they paying their "fair share"?

The government isn't starved for money; it takes in over 18% of GDP already. The problem is that the Federal government spends too much. The bigger problem is that people like our friendly commentators don't think that's a problem -- or that it needs to spend EVEN MORE.

Paul in NJ of NJ 6:34PM April 09, 2010

This is so absurd. Bush/Obama are both the same: big government spenders who in favor of war without end. Immoral sums of feed-the-rich bailout money have been showered on the filthy rich 24/7 since as far back as 9/11 as "We the people" continue to get showered on by what's been hitting the fan.

How ubfair and typical is that. And how quickly we forget, if we've even been keeping track at all. I question the intelliegence of a "public" who don't think the rich should have to pay their taxes, especially when the top richest 1% among us own almost 50% of the nation's financial wealth.

Peak oil, big government taxation, when mixed with a populace dumbed down by "bread and circuses" stimulus and Reality t.v. is a recipe for disaster. And to hear that those most responsible for the recession get off with a slap on the wrist and o.k.'d tax-cuts from the court of "public" opinion shows that ignorance is at an all-time high.

A 3% tax on everything, 50% of paychecks going to the military, and having a $78.8 trillion national debt that almost equals the GDP of the entire world. And that was before Obamacare's $3 trillion price tag with 23 million people in America still lacking health insurance in 2019. We need to trim the oil wars, trim the fat, and make the rich pay their fair share.

Most of us don't even have a clue how unsustainable our consumerist economy is. That's good news if you're an Ant; bad news if you're a Grasshopper. The "public" can play all summer for all I care. Just don't expect the taxpayers to fork over "Ant" stimulus because you were lazy and hazy.

Todd C.W. of HI 2:58AM April 04, 2010

About this blog

About this blog

Washington Whispers has been featured in U.S. News & World Report since 1933, offering a fun, insider's view of Washington.

advertisement

Latest Videos

advertisement