PETA Defends Playboy Model in Angel Pose Ad

December 23, 2009 RSS Feed Print

First the Catholics complained about PETA's latest ad featuring Playboy's Joanna Krupa floating nude as a holy angel barely covered with a cross in the antifur group's "Be an Angel for Animals" campaign. Now the Anti-Defamation League also has assailed the ad as offensive.

"As an organization dedicated to fighting prejudice and bigotry, we believe this ad campaign can be offensive to people of faith, particularly Catholics who consider the objects portrayed in the ads as sacred. We find it ironic that an organization dedicated to ethical treatment of animals can have such a low standard of ethics when it comes to respect for fellow humans," wrote ADL National Director Abraham Foxman to PETA.

Now People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals has responded, and it provided both letters to Whispers. PETA Vice President Bruce Friedrich says he welcomes the criticism, mostly because it helps make the case that the controversial ad campaign gets people talking about his organization's animal rights issues. What's more, he suggested that the group is following in the footsteps of Jesus.

"We are not the first to walk this road: Jesus himself defied the conventions of his day and outraged local religious and government leaders in order to ensure that his message of compassion was heard," responded Friedrich, who described himself as a devout Catholic. "I'm convinced that when iconography is used in an effort to make the world kinder and more just, it is fulfilling the highest goal of humanity: to strive to enact God's vision of justice and peace on Earth."

But comparing the ad campaign featuring a nude Playboy model to Jesus? "She is doing God's work of making the world a more compassionate place, no question," he says.

Read the letters here:

Tags:
PETA

Reader Comments Read all comments (12)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

That's offensive. And I'm an Australian Anglican lesbian. We don't go in for fanaticism.

I think it's bad enough that PETA treat women like meat to flog their message, but deliberately disrespecting people in a bid to get noticed is just sad.

I'm a vet student, so yes, I definitely believe in alleviating animal suffering where possible, but I'm just going to add this to the list of reasons PETA is a glitzy, fluffy, not at all practical way of setting about it. I'm sure they must do some good work, but all I ever hear is them making fools of themselves and making people putting in the hard yards to get things done in constructive and reasonable way look bad.

Sarah 6:02AM October 24, 2010

Although some peta members truly care about animals, (i.e., those poor souls that donate money to peta). To peta its all about the money.

Just visit www.petakills animals.com Enough said

trekker04 of MA 9:22AM December 24, 2009

'THE END JUSTIFIES THE MEANS' can be used in any arguement an thi is just another.

Jack Gourley of NC 7:58AM December 24, 2009

About this blog

About this blog

Washington Whispers has been featured in U.S. News & World Report since 1933, offering a fun, insider's view of Washington.

advertisement

Latest Video

advertisement