Steward's 10 'Myths' About Global Warming and CO2 Damage

October 9, 2009 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (69)

By Paul Bedard, Washington Whispers

Former Vice President Al Gore may have won the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize for his work on global warming issues, but that doesn't mean everybody believes what Gore does: that carbon dioxide emissions cause Earth to warm. In fact, one contrarian is getting attention in Washington this week as he distributes his new book defending CO2 to House and Senate members involved in the ongoing fight over the energy bill and cap-and-trade scheme. Believe him or not, H. Leighton Steward, whom Whispers wrote about earlier this week, tells us in his new book, Fire, Ice and Paradise, about the "myths" of global warming and the damaging effects of carbon dioxide. His book is full of national and international studies, and he says that while he's often sneered at for being a contrarian, few want to debate him directly on the issue. But many are still working to cut CO2 emissions. In winning his Nobel Prize, Al Gore took on criticisms like Steward's and put his $1.5 million prize money toward pushing for cuts in CO2; and bolstering his group, the Alliance for Climate Change. "It is truly a planetary emergency, and we have to respond quickly," Gore warned in 2007. And this weekend, at a Planet Green festival in Washington, environmental activist Ed Begley Jr., of Living With Ed, plans to meet with reporters to push his campaign for cutting carbon emissions.

From Steward's book and our interview, here are Steward's top 10 global warming "myths."

Steward's Myth 1: The planet Earth will be healthier with lower CO2 levels.
He says: More CO2 is needed to bolster plant life, which turns the gas into oxygen while also providing food.

Steward's Myth 2: Rising CO2 levels cause temperatures to rise.
He says: Temperatures over time have fluctuated while CO2 levels have remained steady. What's more, temperature increases have historically led increases in CO2 levels.

Steward's Myth 3: Sea levels will rise 20 feet by the end of the century.
He says: The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change predicts only a 17-inch rise, and "most climatologists predict a rise of only 7 or 8 inches."

Steward's Myth 4: Scientists unanimously say that CO2 caused by humans is the dominant cause of global warming.
He says: Not so. "Many, many reputable scientists believe that natural factors overpower the current influence of CO2 on global warming."

Steward's Myth 5: The United States is the largest contributor of human-caused CO2.
He says: China, which has no CO2 restrictions, has recently exceeded the United States. Plus, it is "opening a new coal-fired power plant every week, and its production of automobiles is growing at a much more rapid rate."

Steward's Myth 6: Storms are more frequent and intense because of global warming.
He says: "According to the National Hurricane Center, storms are no more intense or frequent worldwide than they have been since 1850. Temperatures were high in the 1920s and 1930s when there was much less CO2 in the atmosphere. Constant 24-7 media coverage of every significant storm worldwide just makes it seem that way. Insist on the facts, not just what some individuals or reporters say to support their cause."

Steward's Myth 7: Polar bears will go extinct if this warm period continues through the 21st century.
He says: "A jawbone of a polar bear has been found that is 120,000 years old, a time during the previous interglacial when temperatures were 5 degrees Celsius warmer and sea level 19 feet higher than today. They adapted then; why not now?"

Steward's Myth 8: CO2 is a pollutant.
He says: "CO2 is a great airborne fertilizer, which, as its concentrations rise, causes additional plant growth and causes plants to need less water."

Steward's Myth 9: As Earth warms, the climate will become much drier and windier.
He says: Ice cores prove the opposite. The colder times were both windier and drier.

Steward's Myth 10: Higher levels of CO2 than the current 385 parts per million in the atmosphere are harmful to humans.
He says: The warning level of CO2 in submarines isn't reached until the atmosphere has 8,000 parts per million of CO2.

So who is Steward? Below is the biography he supplied.

H. Leighton Steward
Leighton Steward is a geologist, environmentalist, author, and retired energy industry executive. He has written about the reasons for the loss of much of the Mississippi River Delta (Louisiana's national treasure) and has given advice on how the nation can achieve "no net loss" of wetlands in the future, advice that has been accepted by the Environmental Protection Agency and the Army Corps of Engineers. He was lead author on a book about nutrition and health (Sugar Busters) that gave advice on how to lose weight and prevent and or treat diabetes. The book became a No.  1 New York Times bestseller for 16 weeks and made a significant contribution to the changes that have occurred regarding the availability of no-sugar-added, higher fiber, and low-glycemic products in the supermarkets. More recently, Steward has written a book (Fire, Ice and Paradise) that is an endeavor to educate the nonscientist about the many causes of global climate change so that readers will be better prepared to understand what they hear, see, and read about in the media and from the politicians. He has received numerous environmental awards, including the regional EPA Administrator's Award for environmental excellence. He is chairman of the board of the Institute for the Study of Earth and Man at Southern Methodist University, was chairman of the National Wetlands Coalition, and was twice chairman of the Audubon Nature Institute. He currently serves on the boards or boards of visitors of the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, EOG Resources, the Buffalo Bill Historical Center, and the Southwest Research Institute and is an emeritus member of the Tulane University board. His current interest lies in helping to educate the public and politicians about the benefits of carbon dioxide (CO2) as it relates to the plant and animal kingdoms and their related ecosystems and habitats and to the general health of humanity.

Do you agree with Steward or with Al Gore? Weigh in below with your comments.

  • Check out our gallery of political cartoons.
  • Want your Whispers first? Check out U.S. News Weekly.
Tags:
energy policy and climate change,
global warming

Reader Comments Read all comments (69)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

You smell

bob of DE 4:23PM December 14, 2010

After the cold winter, the hacked e-mails, political pundit scare tactics and a mis-led public - EXXONMOBIL not only continues to aggree with the 2007 IPCC report, it has expanded its official corporate web-site to include the list of 40 scientific papers written by its lead scientists and peer reviewed by groups recognized by the National Academy of Science. (Unlike the "Oregon Petition" which was "peer-reviewed" by the author's business partner's organization) EXXONMOBIL also includes a list of 30 important books and papers also written by its scientists. The peer-reviewed work is included in the IPCC reports. EXXONMOBIL paid for their scientific research which is included in the IPCC reports. How can anyone in their right mind believe that there is a science out there which takes EXXONMOBIL off the hook and EXXONMOBIL doesn't know about. Instead, this corporation contiues to state the IPCC is correct. And so does Shell, BP and Chevron.

John of WY 4:24PM July 08, 2010

It's good to finally see an obviously accomplished scientist coming out with facts to rebut the hype and 'political science' of the environmentalist's new pet, global warming.

When I was in school, way back in the '70's, the scientific consensus was that we were approaching another ice age, not being threatened by global warming. I find it implausibe that such a drastic change can come about over a mere 30 years. Especially since temperatures have been dropping since 1998, according to the scientific community that DOESN'T receive all of it's funding from the government!

There has been quite a bit of evidence found in the last year that most of the data paraded out by the liberals was junk science, i.e., we have a theory, let's make the data fit our theories. Much of it was deliberatly contrived to serve a particular political agenda, i.e., global warming. They weren't concerned with truth, as it's not as profitable for 'our' government. Or the businesse their cronies co-incidentally formed just before all this 'science' came to light. But you don't see that on the mainstream media newscasts - it's not politically correct. And I don't believe in co-incidences that make someone billions of dollars - there is no such thing.

The carbon footprint fraud being perpetrated on the American people, and many others around the world, is just that - fraud. Junk science being used by corrupt politicians, scientists, and charlatans to increase tax income, increase government control over industry and increase profits for the select companies who toe the party line. Scientists included, as many are completely funded through tax dollars, and if there isn't a crisis, then their 'work' is irrelevant. We can't have that, now, can we?

Not to mention all of the governmant's new agencies and self righteous employees that can completely ruin a company with a few strokes of a pen, or by 'losing' required paperwork and/or permits. Most of these peons are more concerned with justifying their jobs and fat paychecks, than reporting the truth.

It's high time the frauds are exposed for what they are - liars. Al Gore may have invented the internet (woohoo!) but he's not a scientist by any stretch of the imagination. As soon as people start thinking for themselves, instead of believing every cockamamie theory that bozo starts spouting off about, the sooner the truth will come out. He may have won the Nobel Peace Prize, but so did Obama, and neither one earned, or deserved the award.

The Nobel Society has lost credibility as a scientific organization and become just another blow hard political special interest group concerned with advancing their own agendas for personal and political profit.

And that's a crying shame.

Steve of MO 8:44PM June 11, 2010

About this blog

About this blog

Washington Whispers has been featured in U.S. News & World Report since 1933, offering a fun, insider's view of Washington.

advertisement

Latest Videos

advertisement