Cousteau Focuses on Obama's Ocean Policy

Reader Comments

Back to blog

The information here is great. I will invite my friends here.

Thanks

credit repair of AL 7:50AM January 26, 2010

How serious is the president when as commander and chief he appears willing willing to let the coast guard purpose a two decade plan, with proposals that mirror the IMO for ten years. Even if he wins re election we would have no change from the IMO policy during his administration. What if the next commander and chief wish to direct the coast guard to again delay? We still will not have assured protection even with this new interest from the coast guard.

Don Mitchel of NY 9:01AM December 07, 2009

all good things

Globals of SC 8:32PM October 02, 2009

it's good that president barack obama addressed students as free thinking responsible citizens of our educated country

patchur of CA 12:26AM September 11, 2009

Contrary to accepted wisdom, and notwithstanding Mr. Cousteau, the environment is not as fragile as the “professional doom and gloom fund raisers” would have the people believe. I’d like to point out a few examples that illustrate just how hardy the planet actually is.

During world War II more than 6500 ships were sunk. All carried thousands of gallons of fuel oil. More than 1,000 were fuel/oil carriers. Additionally, over 200 tankers were so badly damaged that they lost their cargoes of crude or fuel oil before making it back to port. Dozens of tank farms and refineries were blown up in harbors in Europe, the Pacific and Asia. Additionally, millions of tons of explosives were dropped into the sea. A case in point, 77 Japanese ships were sunk by thousands of bombs , bullets and torpedoes in Truk Lagoon in one day. One might think that would be a Superfund site, on the contrary, it is now a thriving dive resort with a diverse underwater ecosystem.

You won’t see any photos of oil covered seagulls in the world’s publications of the period. You will find no hysterical scientists screaming for a world wide clean up. The earth’s oceans survived and, as I am sure Mr. Cousteau knows, the hopane marker of ocean oil pollution reached it’s peak during World War II and has continued to decline ever since.

From 1946 through 1963 (France detonated more in 1998) there have been more than 100 nuclear tests above and below the surface of the Pacific Ocean. Atomic bombs were dropped on fleets of ships and those that weren’t sunk were later scuttled or sunk by naval gunfire. These ships apart from being radioactive were full of oil and fuel. This was an environmental insult beyond description and yet, again, the ocean survived. Of course there was that mutant Godzilla thing, but I digress.

In the mid-16th century Juan Cabrillo made note of an oil slick more than a hundred miles wide off southern California in his ship’s log. His crew wrote of mountains of tar and pitch on the beaches with which the local Indians sealed their canoes. Today we would have legions of environmentalists chasing those Indians for tooling around in their tar pitch canoes. But would it be p.c. to chase an Indian, I mean Native American?

I have photos of hills of tar on Santa Barbara beaches from the 1920’s and there are so many oil derricks the beach can’t be seen. Before Marina del Rey was built, it was full of oil wells and oozing pools of sludge. Ship’s logs of the 19th century speak of vast oil slicks off the Pacific coast. But, it appears there has been some progress made judging from the current real estate values.

Studies by National Academy of Sciences and confirmed by such left wing institutions as U.C.Santa Barbara confirm that oil platforms actually reduce the amount of oil seeping into the sea through “natural” fissures. As a matter of fact, underwater oil seeps from the earth’s strata introduce about 1,700 barrels of crude oil into U.S. ocean waters every day! This amount is 150 times the amount lost by the 3000 plus oil platforms operating in U.S. waters. And that 1,700 barrels of natural seepage would increase if we discontinued offshore drilling.

Speaking of drilling, why don’t we drill more sites in Alaska? We can drill diagonally and leave a small “foot print”. In the 1970’s environmentalists predicted the doom of the caribou herds and the destruction of the ecosystem if the Alaskan pipeline were built. The caribou herds have nearly doubled in number since the pipeline was completed and the ecosystem survived.

Global Warming is another a perfect example of distortion and half truth. There have been several periods of global glaciation over the past 50 million years. These periods of glaciation were followed by periods of “global warming” - during which even the polar ice caps melted. The last period of glaciation, the Pleistocene Epoch, ended just 3000 years ago and the general trend since has been “global warming” . However, during this most recent period of warming there have been at least two “little ice ages”, one lasting more than 100 years. The ice is the real killer - If I were in marketing for Ford or GM I’d run an ad for an SUV as a “future Ice Age preventer”.

The inventor of DDT won the Nobel Prize for Medicine. President Roosevelt said DDT saved millions of lives during World War II. The World Health organization admits that millions of people die every year of insect born disease because of costs, bans, lawsuits and restrictions on it’s use. The use of DDT was discontinued because of a “theory” that it causes thinning bird egg shells. DDT has never been shown to affect humans in any way. Incidentally, when West Nile Virus first appeared in just one county in New York state in 2001 if we had possessed the political will to use DDT we might have eradicated the disease and saved hundreds of human lives and millions of birds and mammals annually. Instead, we now have this plague in North America forever and the costs in life, medical care and mosquito abatement are staggering.

Let’s just forget about all the above stats and facts. For the moment let’s focus on storm drains and asphalt. There are hundreds of thousands of square miles of parking lots and roads in the U.S. These roads receive the drippings, brake lining dust and rubber tire wear of over 200 million automobiles and trucks everyday. When it rains all that oil, transmission fluid, dust and coolant emulsifies and courses down the nearest drain to the sea. The asphalt itself breaks down (that’s why road crews resurface every 5 or 6 years) and being a petroleum product the asphalt too, heads to the sea. And, what of all the sewage treated and otherwise flowing to the sea? Consider the millions of gallons of herbicides, pesticides, drain and oven cleaners, degreasers, detergents and solvents in our nations sewers, flowing toward the sea. How about the tens of millions of homes with asphalt roofing shingles that break down and make their way to neighborhood gutters? What of the tons of animals feces bobbing down the streams and storm drains as always, to the sea?

Perhaps Mr. Cousteau could tell me why is it that when people think of a harbor or marina they have visions of a pristine aquatic environment. Flipper and Free Willy frolicking among the coral reefs. A harbor or marina is a “parking lot “ for boats and ships. When folks visit Wall Mart to they hope to see Bambi and Thumper browsing the parking lot landscaping? When they fly out of LAX to they expect Smoky Bear to amble out on the tarmac? No, most folks understand that when you level out the land and pour 4 inches of bubbling asphalt over it you’ve pretty much destroyed the “ecosystem” and killed everything in it. But, that outcome is accepted as the cost of doing business. However, when it comes to a marina or the sea they seem to leave their common sense at home.

There are many battles worthy of environmentalist resources; gill nets, “factory fishing”, sanctions against countries pumping raw sewage and toxic waste into the sea, stricter “world wide” catch limits and nuclear and biological arms control.

In closing, I’d like to point out that unless the various “quasi-religious” environmental groups become less dogmatic, myopic, micro managers, who believe the only acceptable interaction between man and nature should be preservation, restoration and veneration. Who promote the philosophy of “close it down, fence ‘em out” and “Every sort of human endeavor is evil” they run the risk of becoming further marginalized on the extreme left.

R.L. Schaefer of CA 12:31PM September 04, 2009

who cares

seven of MT 3:24PM September 02, 2009

HEY PHIL

HOW ABOUT A STEAK FRITES ?

JAcqui duclos 11:33AM September 01, 2009

HEY PHIL

HOW ABOUT A STEAK FRITES ?

JAcqui duclos 11:33AM September 01, 2009

"In order to stabilize world population, we must eliminate 350,000 per day." - Jacques-Yves Cousteau

I was one of those who admired his grandfather, (Jacques-Yves Cousteau) and sat around listening to John Denver singing "Calypso" (the name of the ship on which the Cousteau's sailed the world).

Then I found out how much of a radical environmentalist Jacques-Yves Cousteau really was. He is in perfect agreement with the ten commandments of the Georgia Guide Stones, especially the first commandment, "Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature."

My question is 'which half billion should inherit the earth?' In other words, someone advocates the slaughter of 6 billion people and Cousteau sets the rate at a manageable 350,000 per day. That's an insane utopian dream by some who actually imagine themselves in control of the world’s vast resources at the expense of the bulk of humanity!

http://www.metrolyrics.com/calypso-lyrics-john-denver.html

http://www.thegeorgiaguidestones.com/stones.htm

Now comes Philippe Cousteau Jr., who does have legitimate concerns, but there has to be a balance. Offshore drilling technology requires fewer platforms to yield immense benefits to humanity for millennia to come.

The most devastating thing that could occur is the die off of humanity to the levels and at the rate prescribed by these environmentalist wackos.

R. Hoeppner of CA 9:55AM September 01, 2009

What's odd to me is that the debate on our ocean uses and development is that it occurs as if the ocean is all uniform and looks like the bottom of your bathtub and we just need to go out and get the resources. There is an incredible amount of different ocean habitat types such as rocky canyons, mountain ranges, plateaus and sandy plains that are important for all kinds of fish and wildlife. We need protected ocean conservation areas just like ewe have protected areas on land.

For example, in New England we have a place called Cashes Ledge which is about 80 miles east of Boston and about 25-30 feet deep at its shallowest point. This is an underwater mountain top and has the deepest kelp forest in the north Atlantic. It's an amazing habitat for wildlife and deserves more study and permanent protection. The federal Ocean Task Force certainly needs to understand the economic and ecological benefits of ocean habitat protection.

Sean of MA 3:59PM August 31, 2009

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Back to blog

About this blog

About this blog

Washington Whispers has been featured in U.S. News & World Report since 1933, offering a fun, insider's view of Washington.

advertisement

Latest Video

advertisement