James Baker Backs Reinstating the Draft

May 3, 2009 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (148)

By Paul Bedard, Washington Whispers

Rep. Charlie Rangel, Congress's lone champion of reinstating the military draft, can count on another Korean War-era vet for support: Republican James Baker, a soldier in the Reagan and Bush administrations. Baker, secretary of state during the first Gulf War, visited a private girls' school in Virginia, where he was asked how to attract kids into some kind of service that gives them a stake in the country's future. "This is a very unpopular thing that I am about to say," he warned. "But one thing that makes it harder to go to war is to have a draft, because when you have a draft, then everybody's got a stake in it, and the costs of war are brought home much more vividly and vigorously to the American people. I think national service is a wonderful idea." But unlikely, he conceded: "You get killed if you support a draft, politically, but it sure would raise the stakes. Everybody would understand a lot better what we have at stake when we go to war."

Follow Paul and Nikki on Twitter.

Check out more Washington Whispers.

Tags:
James Baker

Reader Comments Read all comments (148)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Maybe people should remember why this is a free country. I can not believe that people are so stupid. Living in the war zone and not joining the military, I can not see the way you think. Why dont you just go and live in Canada.

Justin of MS 9:27PM November 04, 2010

Rangel's proposed draft won't actually pass. The pentagon is 100% against the idea.

He only proposed it "as a political tactic to make congress deliberate further before making future decisions regarding war." He thinks that he can make a draft in which EVERYONE would have to participate. Upper class and elite of our society included. He thinks that if political leaders have more at stake (their kids lives) then this will "act as a deterrent for lawmakers in their future decisions to engage in military conflicts.” He wants to use American lives as a political ploy.

Also, for those of you who are morally opposed to the war, Rangel has added something in proposal for you. If you are physically, mentally, or morally not able to participate in the military, you will be assigned to a civilian position, such as an airport security gaurd. There's alot of debate going on about the proposal. The congressional digest has alot of good reading.

seyrra of AZ 12:29AM October 26, 2010

This is ridiculous. I will NOT fight for a war that I have NO belief in what so ever. Politicians should be fighting their own damned wars and not forcing the youth of the nation to throw their lives away for oil. If I were drafted into the military you can bet your ass I would go fighting and not even blink at doing anything in my power to get out of it. If I hear the draft is actually going to be instated, im taking all finances I have available and getting the hell out of this country. I would have fought in WWI or WWII because it actually stood for something. I will not fight for a corrupt capitalist based government only interested in their own financial and power gains.

a true patriot of WY 10:50PM December 02, 2009

About this blog

About this blog

Washington Whispers has been featured in U.S. News & World Report since 1933, offering a fun, insider's view of Washington.

advertisement

Latest Videos

advertisement