Harry Reid Likes Obama's No-Macho Afghanistan Plan

Reader Comments

Back to blog

so your not an American? Whats with all the name calling? You get no brownnie points and you have just lost your own point with the very hot headed additude you speak against. Your just a pot screaming black. Maybe you should go live in middle east and leave freedom for all us self rightous AMERICANS!

I'm not saying WAR is the answer, but I do know freedom comes at a cost.

cathy stahl of IL 11:23PM April 22, 2009

""There's no chest thumping, there's no 'Bring it on,' there's no 'Mission accomplished,' " Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid"

..negligible media coverage, no wives of fallen sons camped out in Southside Chicago...

Zumwaltsnavy of IL 9:41AM March 29, 2009

What you failed to report was whether Obama was drinking a glass of water while Reid was appearing to speak.

Disgusted of PA 1:51PM March 28, 2009

For over 25 years Afghanistan has been at WAR, and the USA has played a role in this war; directly or indirectly. The USA role playing in this destruction on Afghanistan is mostly from a negative perspective. When George W. (WICKED) Bush launched his attack on Afganistan, I remember reading an article stating that the people in Afganistan are so poor that its average citizen lived on approximately $0.16 (16 cents) per week.

For all you barbaric, backward thinking, blood-thirsty so-call self-rightous Americans; Answer this question hosestly! Which one of you can live on $0.16 (16 cents) per hour without picking someone elses garbage, rob and or kill others out of your desperate survival needs.

And, if you have solide evidence pointing directly to someone to blame, what would be your intention towards that culprit? US Americans need to step briefly into the Afganistans shoes and be the one on the outside looking in, to see that war is never the answer to Afganistan's problem.

For all of you US Americans who can do the maths, compare the USA costs of sending its military forces to fight in Afganistan and teaching Afganistan how to become self sufficient. Which do you honestly believe will be better for both sides?

O'Neil of CT 10:14AM March 28, 2009

Afghanistan might be the textbook example of "you broke it; you bought it." We have spent ungodly amounts of time and money keeping this country at war with itself and others. If it wasn't to support the Pakistani ISI and the Afghan mujahideen during the war with the USSR, it was to support the Pakistani ISI during their proxy war with the Northern Alliance and the subsequent civil war, not to mention 2001 and beyond. Most Afghans are adamant that the US funds the Taliban, mainly because our Pakistani aid money goes right back to the people trying to derail our efforts in the first place.

People here might be more inclined to liberate themselves and support the notion of a representative republic (i.e. the talking points of sweaty-faced, overweight college republicans and other children of privilege) if they weren't scrambling to find food, shelter and recourse when they're robbed and beaten at roadside checkpoints. If you talk to an American soldier about what Afghanistan is like (as opposed to just mouth breathing about the heroic sacrifice for freedom and security that we're making), you'll probably hear something along the lines of "this place is like the middle ages." It is exceptionally far behind Iraq as far as human development goes, so go figure that the circa 2003-2007 brute force tactics that didn't work in Iraq totally didn't work in this country, either.

I can only speak for SW Afghanistan, where I am currently deployed in support of Operation Enduring Freedom, but this place is poor to the point that all superlatives fail, and it almost unequivocally a feudal warlord society. The bullets that put holes in 19-year-old Americans and the guns from which they were fired were purchased by American taxpayer dollars from 1981-present, and the more you talk of big war / hard charging approach towards this conflict, the more you start to resemble the way the Soviets fought and lost the war. If Obama and Reid and the rest of the current administration are sending police trainers and agricultural experts, it's more than appropriate and long past due.

A softer approach that puts more US soldiers on the ground interacting with poeple and generally reinforcing the local government establishment might yield results. Go ahead and shake a fist at Obama and other spineless democrats -- just don't be surprised when, much like the last 30 years have shown, limitless numbers of munitions and ceaseless, thoughtless brutality do not win the war in Afghanistan.

Nate 5:00AM March 28, 2009

The people running washington are nothing but a buch of tax dodging socialists out to ruin this country and they don't have a clue as to what they are doing.

rick dean of NY 3:34PM March 27, 2009

This guy is nothing but a crook and a wimp. I would love to see his azz on a battle field while his leaders did nothing but criticize and accuse him.

Larry of CA 2:57PM March 27, 2009

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Back to blog

About this blog

About this blog

Washington Whispers has been featured in U.S. News & World Report since 1933, offering a fun, insider's view of Washington.

advertisement

Latest Videos

advertisement