Vets of Surge Call on Obama to Support the Strategy

September 9, 2008 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (19)

A pro-troop surge campaign that followed lawmakers home during the summer vacation is hitting Washington this week when veterans who participated in the Iraq offensive call on senators, especially Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Barack Obama, to vote to support the Bush initiative. Independent Sen. Joe Lieberman and Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham, both allies of Republican presidential candidate Sen. John McCain, plan to add the support language to the defense authorization bill this week. In a letter to colleagues going out today and provided to Whispers (printed below), the duo say, "We invite you to join us in cosponsoring Senate Resolution 636, a bipartisan resolution that recognizes the strategic success achieved by the surge in Iraq and expresses our gratitude to the brave men and women in uniform who made that success possible." This effort, which has the potential to galvanize supporters of the surge, dogged many senators back home during the summer vacation. A group called Vets for Freedom ran ads featuring troops involved in the surge demanding support from Congress and Obama. They called the ad, "I am the Surge." The effort comes just after Obama shifted his rhetoric on the issue and as President Bush is calling for troop reductions because of the success of the surge. According to an insider working on the issue with the two senators, the vote on the resolution that could come this week has the potential to put war opponents in an impossible position. "In less than a year and as a result of the surge, the 'finish the job' Iraq policy position has gone from a tremendous liability to the policy position with all of the momentum. There is now a surge for the surge," said the insider, who has Republican ties. It's just the latest example of how lawmakers from both sides of the aisle plan to use floor votes on controversial or sensational issues to support or potentially embarrass the presidential candidates. Below is the Lieberman-Graham letter:

United States Senate

WASHINGTON, DC 20510

 September 9, 2008

 Dear Colleague:

 We invite you to join us in cosponsoring Senate Resolution 636, a bipartisan resolution that recognizes the strategic success achieved by the surge in Iraq and expresses our gratitude to the brave men and women in uniform who made that success possible.

 As you know, the war in Iraq has been deeply divisive for our country. The Senate spent much of last year locked in intensive debate about the wisdom of the new strategy that General David Petraeus was pursuing in Iraq and the deployment of approximately 30,000 additional U.S. Army and Marine Corps servicemembers in support of it.

 In fact, it was just one year ago this month that General Petraeus and Ambassador Crocker returned to Washington to report on the progress of the surge. At the time, many Americans still doubted whether the surge was working.

 Today, by contrast, it is beyond dispute that the surge has been an extraordinary strategic success for our country, an operation that is certain to be studied and praised for decades to come in the annals of American military history.

 Although the war in Iraq is not yet over, virtually every indicator of progress-political, economic, and military-has dramatically improved since General Petraeus took command in February 2007 and the surge began.

 Large-scale sectarian violence has effectively ended. A1 Qaeda in Iraq-which our intelligence community last year characterized as "the most visible and capable affiliate" of a1 Qaeda's global terrorist network and "the only one known to have expressed a desire to attack the Homeland"-has been dealt a near strategic defeat, in the words of CIA director Gen. Michael Hayden. The Iranian-backed militias that once controlled large swaths of the country have been routed. And as our enemies have retreated, American casualties have likewise plunged.

 These represent more than mere "tactical" gains. Because of the surge, the United States has been saved from a strategic defeat in the heart of the Middle East that would have carried catastrophic consequences for our country, and our allies, far beyond the borders of Iraq. Indeed, because of the success of the surge, America's strategic position in the Middle East and the world is stronger; our most dangerous enemies- a1 Qaeda and Iran-are weaker; and our country is safer.

General Petraeus is expected to hand over command of coalition forces in Iraq on Tuesday, September 16. After months of divisive debate, we hope that members of both parties can set aside whatever disagreements have divided us over Iraq in the past, and join together now to acknowledge what we all know to be true: that the surge has been a strategic success; that we owe our deepest gratitude as a nation to the courageous men and women in uniform who fought so valiantly to achieve that success; and that their struggle and sacrifice must not be squandered.

 We hope that you will join us as a cosponsor of Senate Resolution 636 to send a bipartisan message of national unity that we salute our heroic troops for their extraordinary achievement.

 If you have any questions, please feel free to contact Vance Serchuk in Senator Lieberman's office or Jen Olson in Senator Graham's office.

 Best regards,

Joe Lieberman
United States Senator

Lindsey O. Graham
United States Senator

Tags:
Joe Lieberman,
Barack Obama

Reader Comments Read all comments (19)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

OK. Does this recognition guarantee our troops will get a modern GI Bill? Does it apologize for sending them in without a plan in '03? Or without armor in '04? PTSD assitance in '05?Lets give our troops real thanks. Lets make sure they have every opportunity for home ownership, health care, college educations and good jobs. Not just some letter. They know they did a good job, lets give them the thanks they deserve.

Billy Valenzuela of CA 12:50AM October 08, 2008

Bush jr and McCain are trying to take credit for the surge working, when all the experts say paying the rebel tribes (bribing the enemy) is what brought down the violence...for now.

That you believe we are there to "protect freedom" would be laughable had it not costs so many lives, and trillions of dollars. All our sons and daughters are there to protect is oil. Otherwise, we would have simply sent in a few jets and bombed each of Husseins palaces. Why do you think we had soldiers protecting oil fields after the invasion, and not the fields of ammunition? Why do you think we didn't invade Darfur?

....hint, 3 letter word

shane in san diego of CA 12:32PM October 02, 2008

I thought success was supposed to be political and economic success after the surge created breathing room.

I haven't seen any of that success and for McCain to say it has been a success is a little premature just like Bush's "Mission Accomplished" banner.

Sure you can put a cop on every street corner and reduce crime but that doesn't fix the criminal mind. And how long can you afford to to that- in every country?

Rick of NV 12:12PM October 01, 2008

About this blog

About this blog

Washington Whispers has been featured in U.S. News & World Report since 1933, offering a fun, insider's view of Washington.

advertisement

Latest Videos

advertisement