Maybe a Cheap Lunch is Okay for Congress

August 12, 2008 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (2)

Democrats and Republicans think that Congress might have gone too far in barring lobbyists from opening their wallets at the local McDonald's or Quiznos. We hear that both sides are starting talks about allowing lobbyists to buy staff aides or members a cheap sandwich or drink, reversing course from the total ban recently enacted. Under consideration: letting lawmakers and aides receive a snack worth $10. A $50 annual cap would be placed on spending per lawmaker or top aide by a lobbyist. Why? Lawmakers actually rely on info from lobbyists, but the new rules have K Street afraid of getting too close to policymakers. While it would be a major compromise of the 2007 gift and meal ban, the limit is still a far cry from the previous $50-per-meal cap.

Tags:
Congress

Reader Comments Read all comments (2)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

If senators and representatives rely on the information provided by lobbyists, then have the congressmen buy the lobbyists lunch, instead.

But under no circumstances should a lobbyist be allowed to offer any monies, services or other thing which has the appearance of 'buying' a vote.

Were it up to me, I'd have all lobbyists rounded up and dumped naked in the arctic during winter. In theory, at least, they generate enough hot air to keep themselves alive indefinitely, but will probably contribute to global warming.

Fatesrider of CA 2:18AM August 13, 2008

If a Senator or Rep can NOT buy their own lunch at a McDonalds, that is their problem.

ALL LOBBYISTS SHOULD BE OUTLAWED

jc of NV 5:12PM August 12, 2008

About this blog

About this blog

Washington Whispers has been featured in U.S. News & World Report since 1933, offering a fun, insider's view of Washington.

advertisement

Latest Videos

advertisement