• Comment (6)

What the Buffett Rule Gets Wrong

April 11, 2012 RSS Feed Print

Many Americans feel dispossessed. Data supports their grievances: Incomes are stagnant, joblessness is high, and more people really are falling behind.

President Obama thinks he has a solution: A new "fairness" agenda that starts with the "Buffett Rule," a proposal to raise tax rates on millionaires to the same levels as middle-class earners typically pay. This would be followed by other measures meant to assure that "everyone gets a fair shot and everyone does their fair share," as Obama has said repeatedly.

[Photo gallery: The Search for Work.]

The U.S. tax code is certainly a mess that favors those able to move their money around and hire experts to take maximum advantage of loopholes. The Buffett Rule is actually sensible, because it would plug some of the holes that special interests have drilled into the tax code over the last 50 years. But it also seems like the wrong place to start trying to revive America's fortunes, for at least two reasons.

The first problem is that the Buffett Rule and Obama's whole fairness doctrine perpetuates the fiction that Washington can solve the overarching problem of fading prosperity. This might have been plausible 50 years ago, when the U.S. economy was far more self-contained and growing at a heady pace that made lavish government spending possible.

[See why Romney and Obama are both out of touch.]

These days, however, the federal government is heading toward insolvency, and many aspects of the global economy are beyond Washington's control. The enormity of the national debt, which now tops $15 trillion, makes it a mathematical certainty that Washington is going to do less for citizens and ask them to contribute more. If politicians were honest, they'd prepare voters for the sacrifices that lie ahead, instead of promising 99 percent of them that everything will be fine as long as the other 1 percent pays more.

The Buffett Rule would impose a minimum effective tax rate of 30 percent on people who earn more than $1 million per year, raising the average tax rate for that group by a few percentage points. But even the White House acknowledges the amount of extra revenue raised would be trivial compared to the size of the debt. Obama suggests that higher taxes on the wealthy will reduce the need to raise taxes on the middle class. But nearly every budget expert will tell you that the only way to get the debt under control is to raise taxes on virtually everybody, or eviscerate government services.

[See 3 myths about Mitt Romney and the rich.]

The second problem is that Obama is still not telling struggling Americans what it will really take to revive their own fortunes and, to some extent, the nation's: More grit, more self-sufficiency, a more entrepreneurial spirit, and greater engagement with the world beyond U.S. shores.

There are many Americans who have what it takes to succeed in the hypercompetitive global economy. Others are getting the right skills and going where the best opportunities are--which sometimes means overseas. But too many Americans are stuck in place, waiting for jobs that are never coming back or hoping the government will intervene and fix things. The odds are very high that it won't. The government lacks the money and know-how to reboot most parts of the economy. Plus, ongoing paralysis in Washington makes the government the least effective cog in the whole American system.

This is not to say that free-market incentives and more competition are the answer, as many conservatives insist. All the bailouts, corporate meltdowns, and economic disasters of the last decade have made it clear that capitalism generates turbulent waters, not the gentle rising tide that capitalist romantics believe. It raises some boats, swamps others, and threatens a tsunami every now and then.

We need nimble government that enforces some healthy rules, but we also need robust citizens who take smart risks, bounce back from setbacks, and rarely think of government as part of their strategy to get ahead. Warren Buffett, the man, is an exemplar of such drive. The rule named after him isn't.

Rick Newman is the author of Rebounders: How Winners Pivot From Setback to Success, to be published in May. Follow him on Twitter: @rickjnewman.

Tags:
Warren Buffett,
Obama administration,
Barack Obama

Reader Comments Read all comments (6)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Joe C@ you have an interesting perspective in view of money at there is a lake and it is being drained; wealth is created and the economy expands when wealth is created. Inconsistent Taxes and unnecessary regulations impede the grow of any economy. I think everyone is in agreement that our tax code needs an over-haul; however, the first place we all need to look is the spending which I am sure you agree that this is unbridled at this time. The Buffet Rule “preaches” well and gets lots of applause.

Dwayne of MN 1:29PM April 18, 2012

The problem I have with rules like this is that they are usually poorly written and can hurt hard working and not quite so rich Americans. What if I work hard and the company I worked hard to make successful, (AND we are creating lots of jobs BTW), gets sold and I make 2 million dollars ?? I might pay 15% taxes on that and what that would do is take at least 15% of my retirement !! Why would I like something like this hurting the last 20 or 30 years of my life ?

I think the million dollar mark is too low in this economy where we need a couple million dollars saved up for retirement. Now all of of a sudden we are treated like we are rich ?? I ain't going for it written that way. Have Warren Buffet give Obama his retirement instead.

boB of WA 1:57PM April 17, 2012

Maybe it wouldn't "fix everything" to make millionaires pay 30% taxes. But it wouldn't "break" anything either. And it would make me feel a lot better. I'll still be paying more than them with what I earn.

TOM of CA 2:24PM April 16, 2012

Rick Newman

The global economy is mysterious, even scary. Chief Business Correspondent Rick Newman demystifies it and explains what matters to you. Rick is the author of Rebounders: How Winners Pivot from Setback to Success and the co-author of two other books: Firefight: Inside the Battle to Save the Pentagon on 9/11, and Bury Us Upside Down: The Misty Pilots and the Secret Battle for the Ho Chi Minh Trail.

advertisement

advertisement

Latest Videos