• Comment (7)

An Unexpected Boost for Obama on Jobs

January 6, 2012 RSS Feed Print

Could President Obama be a "job creator"?

That buzzphrase has been the Republicans' way of referring to business owners who are supposedly hamstrung by overregulation and outdated economic policies that Obama has pursued over the last three years, including the controversial stimulus program from 2009. Obama himself is a "job killer" in the argot of leading Republicans like Mitt Romney and John Boehner. But Obama may have some persuasive facts at hand to help refute that claim come Election Day.

[See 11 companies on the edge in 2012.]

The latest unemployment report was modestly better than expected, with 200,000 new jobs added to the economy and a slight drop in the unemployment rate, to 8.5 percent. For once there was no need for caveats explaining that the seemingly good news actually masked more troubling signs deeper in the numbers. The economy has now added jobs every month since September 2010, and the pace of job gains appears to be accelerating. After many fits and starts, in other words, the economy may finally be strengthening in earnest.

There's almost no plausible scenario in which an Obama re-election in November would be a shoo-in. The unemployment rate on Election Day will probably still be above 8 percent, which would make Obama, if re-elected, the only president since the Depression to win a second term with such a high jobless rate. Housing will still be a mess and many middle-class Americans will feel they're worse off than they were four years earlier.

But if current trends continue, Obama will have some upbeat news to run on. The economy has already added about 2.7 million jobs since employment bottomed out at the beginning of 2010. If the economy keeps adding 200,000 jobs per month, on average, it would mean another 2 million new jobs by the time Election Day rolls around. That would allow Obama to say—accurately—that under his stewardship, the economy has added nearly 5 million new jobs over the last two years.

[See 3 scenarios for the economy on Election Day.]

That could all happen with the unemployment rate going up, not down, as discouraged workers who had given up finding a job re-enter the workforce, creating a bigger pool of people technically counted as unemployed. Conventional wisdom holds that no president can get re-elected with such a high unemployment rate, no matter what else is happening. But this could be yet another rule of thumb proven obsolete by the dramatically changing economy.

Voters on Election Day will probably be much more influenced by whether they feel their own fortunes are improving than they will by the number that represents the unemployment rate. When Ronald Reagan got re-elected in 1984, the unemployment rate was 7.2 percent, then a record-high for a post-Depression president winning a second term. But the economy had been adding jobs for 20 straight months at that point, which created a tangible sense of things getting better. If the current string of job gains continues, Obama will have 26 straight months of job gains behind him, besting Reagan's run.

There's still a lot that could go wrong for Obama. Many economists expect a pullback in consumer spending in 2012, because spending in 2011 rose faster than income, which means shoppers used their credit cards more and drew down their savings. As they become more frugal in 2012, that's likely to slow the overall economy. A financial meltdown in Europe remains possible and could throw the U.S. economy back into recession. A showdown with Iran could cause an oil spike that pushes gas prices above $4 per gallon. And unforeseen shocks are always a possibility.

[See why shoppers will pull back in 2012.]

But we might finally be seeing a modest recovery that can sustain itself, without any more blood transfusions from the Federal Reserve or temporary subsidies from Congress. At least that's how Obama is likely to portray it. Voters, increasingly, may agree.

Rick Newman is the author of Rebounders: How Winners Pivot From Setback To Success , to be published in May. Follow him on Twitter: @rickjnewman

Tags:
employment,
Obama administration,
campaigns,
2012 presidential election,
Barack Obama

Reader Comments Read all comments (7)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Obama can't create $hit....but debt....and class welfare... he said NO to the pipeline, which would have created alot of jobs!!!! Idiot

Loria of TX 5:30PM January 26, 2012

I believe President Obama will get re-elected (close margin) because the GOP Candidates are NOT rational or believable; NOT consistent in their honesty and personal integrity; and they do NOT truly understand the depth of working or unemployed American's pain; poverty; and dispair at this time. We live in a different age now....NOT the 30's or 50's. Austerity and Division are NOT the way to create a better economy or future for this country. Most Americans truly like the President even though his job performance rating is low. This is because deep in their hearts; they feel he is honest and good intentioned; forward thinking man who truly believed that he could help bring about good changes for our people and this country. And he could have; if the old regime and the Tea Party had not decided from the very first day to block ANY and ALL efforts by him to pass any bills that could make this administration look good in anyway. Its all about their power, mind-controlling the masses, and their money... NOT about helping or healing our people or our economy. No; I believe millions of Americans will vote to give this President another 4 years to steadily bring our economy/jobs back and then work on our debts (after all; President Bush had 8 yrs to destroy it). I am saddened when I see President Obama looking older; fatigued; hurt and humiliated over and over by the hatemongers; and extremely disapointed in the divisive blockaid. However; I know that he canl take us progressively into the future (not the past) where America changes into a better; smarter, HUMANE (not socialistic); democratically and economically stronger country. I mean who would you trust if a disaster where to destroy your state/city/home to come to your aid (Mitt; Newt; Ron; Rick; or the President)? I go for the honest; strong and HUMANE Leader; the one that has kept us safe so far and gave us terrorist justice. The one who has always considered the needs of the working class people; the young; and the seniors. The alternative choice on election day is way too radical; backward; harsh; and frankly scarey!

Karen of FL 10:44AM January 24, 2012

what short memory people have - the House and Senate both were controlled by the democrats years before Obama was elected - so who left the mess?

ember43 of NY 2:07PM January 08, 2012

Rick Newman

The global economy is mysterious, even scary. Chief Business Correspondent Rick Newman demystifies it and explains what matters to you. Rick is the author of Rebounders: How Winners Pivot from Setback to Success and the co-author of two other books: Firefight: Inside the Battle to Save the Pentagon on 9/11, and Bury Us Upside Down: The Misty Pilots and the Secret Battle for the Ho Chi Minh Trail.

advertisement

advertisement

Latest Videos