What@usnews.com: Letters to the Editor

April 16, 2008 RSS Feed Print

Letters to the Editor is a popular feature in most magazines, and U.S. News is no exception. Positive or negative, reader feedback provides added perspective to any story, and each day we post a sampling of new letters online. For example, our recent cover story, "The Pope and American Catholics," elicited numerous missives from readers; a sampling is posted online. Feel free to E-mail your thoughts about any story on usnews.com or in the magazine to letters@usnews.com. Thanks for writing!

Reader Comments Read all comments (13)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

OBAMA’S GENEROUS NEW YEAR GIFT TO CHINA

By Chan Kai Yee

China knows well that its weapons are inferior now; therefore, there is a consensus that China needs two decades of peace so that by 2030, its economy will be much bigger and its weapons, superior to put an end to its century-long history of being bullied by other countries.

When border tension with the Philippines intensified last June and America began to be involved by planning a joint military exercise with the Philippines, under the threat of a possible military confrontation involving America, China conducted the first test of its aircraft carrier in a hurry when the boat had not yet be able to sail by its own engine.

Obama’s unprecedented participation in ASEAN summit meeting on November 11, 2011 and announcement of America’s return to Asia encouraged China’s neighbors to confront China in their border disputes with China. China was greatly worried and forced to step up its military buildup further. It conducted two further tests of its aircraft carrier, put its own satellite GPS system into trial operation and declared its plan to launch 6 more satellites in 2012 to improve the system.

Unexpectedly, Obama gave China a generous New Year gift by his announcement of America’s new strategy. First, he will greatly reduce America’s military spending, making it easier for China’s weaponry to catch up and surpass America’s. What good news for China!

Second, the priority Obama gives to containing China makes it easier for China to increase its military spending and its weapon development personnel work harder.

Third, according to Obama’s new strategy, America has two priorities: China and Iran. Then, if America gives advanced weapons to China’s neighbors to counter China, China will give its best weapons to Iran. As American weapons are expensive, it has to give financial aids but lacks the funds. However, Chinese weapons are cheap and affordable for Iran. China can give its best weapons to Iran as its weapons are being developed and what it has sold is not what it ultimately wants. On the other hand, as China’s neighbors lack political stability, have corrupt officials or may become China’s allies, America cannot sell its best weapons to them, but less advanced weapons are not attractive enough to them.

If luckily for China, there is indeed a war between America and Iran, China will have the opportunity to test its weapons and improve them in real battles while making money by the sales. Even if there is no such a war, you can be sure that Obama’s new strategy has reduced to zero China’s willingness to cooperate with America in dealing with Iran.

Fourth, Obama gives up America’s goal of being able to successfully fight two major regional wars. This tells China that when America is already in one war, China can safely fight a war to resolve border disputes as America lacks the ability to interfere.

Chan Kai Yee is the author of "Tiananmen’s Tremendous Achievements".

CHAN, Kai Yee 3:29AM January 13, 2012

The Democrat/Liberal/Progressive party have always lived in a world of deceit and deception. The rise of conservatives is due to the availability of outlets on radio and cable TV that have just exposed them. Now exposed they want civility while at the same time personally attacking and destroying any viable national conservative politician/leader to avoid discussion of philosophy and issues.Lear is part of the problem. The sanctimony of progressive would be laughable if not so sickening and destructive.

MG Del Rossi of PA 10:37AM October 26, 2011

I got a kick out of the writer who feels a half acre is too small after living on 12 acres before he retired. A 1/2 acre is immense to me Retirement means relax and leave the lawn maintenance to someonelse, or the doing of NEW things and not the lawn

We live(for 14 years) just south of Wilmington NC which was one of your picks for retirement. It is truely wonderful here 20 minutes from the beach. A hot summer--but the early spring,winter and late fall are unparalleled in our opinion.

We worked and lived in Mass.,Calif., and Florida before. Wilmington which is perfect for its varied population and the many events here plus it is a two college town.This brings smart people which is always important when you want to learn more in your 70's.

Hugh van Zelm 910 313 1081

Hugh van Zelm of NC 2:50PM September 28, 2009

News Desk