New Antiabortion Ads Target Bob Casey on Healthcare Bill

Reader Comments

Back to blog

First of all who would want to pay for another couples' mistake? If you want to call it a mistake, I firmly believe in God and I believe that is a created being of God's. So to me woe is us who even participate in annihilation of a created being. People should understand the risks of premarital sex, unprotected sex, and be educated upon these things. Not "oops I made a mistake, now I'm pregnant" Yes it is a choice ladies before you come and attack me with your ideologies on abortion,but it was a choice of whether to be responsible to not have sex or be protected. None of the "heat of the moment stuff " either! I am really upset that the bill being passed, if I understand right, is that what healthcare insurance we choose to pay for will take out a percentage to pay for abortions whether it is our own or another. I oppose! I desperately plea with our leaders hearts and conscience to take another look, especially if they believe in God.

V.L. Taft of PA 10:19PM April 14, 2010

I fully support everyone's choice to believe in whatever helps them get through their day, whether or not it's been proven to be true and regardless of my own personal convictions/values. (For me, it's just the "right thing to do" and am treating others how I would want to be treated. I'm non-religious, therefore the motivation stems from personal choice.)

That said...Muser of NM, you have the best and most informed comment of the bunch - way to go! No one talks much about (or probably realizes) the real damage that is being perpertrated since they are so busy segrating themselves in an insane "moral battle"! Corporations spend millions of dollars resarching how to best attain their goals and agendas, resulting in very clever and (clearly) effective media campains that are passively received by millions of people. It takes time, which many don't have in our corporate-motivated consumer-driven culture, to actively seek out information. The posters on this site are indicative of this fact. If all the so-called "country lovers" really cared, the battle would be citizens vs. corporations, and not pro-choice vs. anti-choice, and it would be raging! But the corporations are getting exactly what they want, and paid for. Lessons learned from years watching Law & Order taught to simply follow the money trail to find the true motivation for any agenda. Any idiot can do that.

RCharles, I don't believe "god" created nature, so to use that phrase in an argument is moot, though I do agree with most of what you have intelligently contributed. I'm glad you introduced the fact of natural abortions. I'd like to go one step further... If people believe that "god" created all, then "god" created science, medicine and also means of artifically imposing death such as abortion, drugs and guns. But no one complains about the opposite...the "god"-given medical practices that artifically prolong life such as CPR, first aid, surgery, breathing & heart machines, artifical valves, skin grafts, disease fighting drugs and vaccines. It's the same agrument, but no one makes it.

Take "god" out of the pregnancy equation, and what we have left is a proven a medical condition. It is a fact that the American federal government defines pregnancy as a disability, which is why employer-only funded maternity leave is catagorized under the American Disability Act and the Family and Medical Leave Act. Under these laws, it is illegal to discriminate against any pregnant woman (or man!) based on their condition. There is no religion jargon here.

Senator Carey's work is a fine example of compromise, which is something the very-religious haven't shown much capability of doing, ever. They may say there is no "black and white" in "god's law", which in itself, is very gray.

Nicole4PA of PA 9:48AM March 22, 2010

Alice wrote: "All arguments against abortion are religious? Give me a break - it has to do with common sense and basic knowledge of life. "

Alice, medical research tells us that about 40% of all embryos are aborted by Nature; some are defective, but the rest just got there at the wrong time in the cycle, or a hormone imbalance, or whatever. 40%. aborted. by Nature, not by man.

You have to agree that god designed Nature, so these are god-approved abortions. Every last one of them and, with 300 million people, there are thousands in this country every day. So if god designed a system that randomly aborts thousands there is no reason man cannot abort an unwanted fetus.

Alice, you argued for "common sense" and "basic knowledge of life"; now you have some basic knowledge of life for an embryo and you can use your common sense to understand that abortion is not about killing, unless god is killing thousands every day.

Cheers!

RCharles

RCharels of PA 4:00PM December 23, 2009

I was disappointed that Senator Bob Casey seemed to be supporting something like the Stupak amendment for the Senate Health Care Bill.

Now I realize that he was working hard at a decent compromise, something that will avoid federal money paying for abortions (not that I agree with that position) and yet not invade the privacy or limit the alternatives for a woman to decide.

He has succeeded; the Senate Health Care bill does not have the onerous, Stupak amendment and the merger of the two bills will come out at the Senate version, a real step for common sense and the dignity of every woman.

I will actively support Bob Casey in his next primary and election. While I would prefer a more liberal Senator, I am pleased that Senator Casey is working hard to satisfy ALL of his constituents and not just the fanatical, right-wing pro-lifers, who want a theocracy instead of a democracy. They should move to Iran or Saudia Arabia.

RCharles

RCharles of PA 3:52PM December 23, 2009

Prolifers can say trillions of times that contents of a pregnant womb constitute a human being, a person, but it is not true. I saw a comment that Jews believe a human is a human only when it is full term and out of the mother. During WWII, I visited a hospital where they kept infants who had spina bifida, where the backbone does not close. It was a horrendous sight, with little tents over the bodies. As for the claim that every conception should be welcomed, that's another religious lie. Whores & clients don't intend to be parents. Men go to whores to ESCAPE the cost & work of fatherhood. Beaten wives do not want to bring another kid into the family to be beaten too. Prolifers must lead very sheltered lives, not to realize there are excellent reasons for abortion. They love their holy books so much, that promise them luxury in Heaven, that they never read gynecology & obstetrics that tell why some women can never safely be mothers. If your family is rich & and a clever fellow comes along & impregnates your naive daughter, expecting a shotgun wedding & life of ease, sponging off inlaws, would you get your daughter to an abortionist, or let the schemer have his way?

aura dawn veirs of CA 8:09AM December 23, 2009

As a Christian I firmly agree that abortion is an absolute morally offense because it deals with the killing of human life. However, the problem I have is with the sincerity of all these so call "Pro-Life" Conservatives Republicans who are so passionately using the issue to kill any form of Health Care at any cost including using the power of the pulpit. I wish I had seen the so called Neo-Moralist including the North American Council of Catholic Bishops be involved in the same passionate way when their Republican friends have waged wars and killed innocent people (men, women and children) around the world in the name of "Strategic Interest", or when they have funded, trained and armed ruthless dictators so they could conduct their ruthless murderous campaign in South America and Asia. I wonder if these people are downright ignorant, lost their sense of good moral judgment, or are insidiously deceiving themselves and the world. Any form of human life, regardless of whether they Black, Yellow or Brown are all created by God and deserve the same respect and dignity of Life.

Paul of ID 9:23PM December 20, 2009

Prolifers are always religious. They obey preachers who tell them abortion is a "sin." See the Code of Canon Law. Section 2430 used to say "people who participate in abortion, the mother not excluded, are subject to excommunication, reserved to the ordinary, at the moment the crime takes effect. if they are clerics, they shall also be deposed." They may have changed the number of the Article, but that ban on abortion is in Canon Law. This is why church law must never be treated here as superior to civil law. Canon Law has no authority over anyone but Catholics who bind themselves to obey it. Yes, the dollar value of the global tithe pool is enormous. Churches work all the time to create, increase and hang onto tithers. Conversion is the work of convincing people to become believers and start handing over that precious ten per cent of lifetime earnings. It is $600,000 if a person pays forty years on a yearly income of $40,000. Prolifers can deny this fact, but it exists. If there were no paid preachers, Prolife would not exist. The pope is proud to be the leader of Ban-Abortion political action. As a patriot, I work to prevent that alien kingdom from interfering in the internal affairs of the USA.

auradawn veirs of CA 2:12AM December 20, 2009

All arguments against abortion are religious? Give me a break - it has to do with common sense and basic knowledge of life. An 'unwanted pregnancy' still involves a human life - wanted or unwanted. Abortion is the killing another human being -legally. Try googling some aborted fetus pictures. It's a human being. Why should I pay for that? You want to use abortion as a form of birth control then buy a rider.

And Cathy from NY - that's a lame argument..Babies with cigarette burns doesn't justify killing an unborn baby!. Have you ever heard of adoption? There are alternatives to abortion...

Alice of NY 5:21AM December 19, 2009

Churches need money from tithes so they ban abortion and suicide. Not one Prolife comment states that fact.

auradawn veirs of CA 2:03PM December 18, 2009

Many Christians don't "get it" that they are "used" on abortion by corporations in media to oppose expanding health care and reforming its financing. Tom F. down below is so CONVINCED by their ads that he thinks there is no need to even discuss ANTHING in health care without first ending abortion. Pharma and the medical establishment court these single-focus people with glee.

It's so much easier for them to use abortion opponents than to mount credible arguments for corporations to continue controlling health care over people.

As for Planned Parenthood, they are a peanut compared to Pfizer, United Healthcare, HCA, etal.

Muser of NM 12:10PM December 18, 2009

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Back to blog

God & Country

U.S. News Weekly

Subscribe Now!

Order the new U.S. News Weekly digital magazine at a special low introductory price!

Dan Gilgoff covers religion for U.S. News & World Report. He is the author of The Jesus Machine: How James Dobson, Focus on the Family, and Evangelical America are Winning the Culture War, and is a former politics editor at beliefnet. E-mail Dan at godandcountry@usnews.com.

Is increasing access to healthcare a moral or faith-based cause?

View Results

Follow Dan Gilgoff on: Facebook | Twitter | MySpace

Photo Gallery

Faith Photo of the Day

See what's going on in the faith world across the globe every day.

SPECIAL REPORTS

Secrets of Islam

A guide to the world's fastest growing religion.

Sacred Places

Explore the significance, history, and enduring power of places people consider most sacred.

Women of the Bible

The "daughters of Eve" play many roles in the Old and New Testaments.