Conservatives' Faith-Based Praise for Obama in Oslo

December 11, 2009 RSS Feed Print

By Dan Gilgoff, God & Country

Lots of prominent voices on the right are praising Obama's "just war" speech from Oslo yesterday, and lots of it—like the speech itself—has serious religious overtones.

"I liked what he said," Sarah Palin told USA Today. "I talked too in my book about the fallen nature of man and why war is necessary at times."

Fallen nature of man . . . a key tenet of Christianity that gets special emphasis in the evangelical tradition. Hence the need to be born again.

"He clearly understood that he had been given the prize prematurely," Newt Gingrich mused after the speech, "but he used it as an occasion to remind people, first of all, as he said, that there is evil in the world."

Recognizing evil . . . a faith-tinged staple of George W. Bush's speeches.

And conservative Washington Post columnist Kathleen Parker says that anyone who still questions whether Obama is truly Christian after yesterday's speech "needs to seek therapy forthwith." Parker called the speech a "Judeo-Christian epistle."

Anyone seen criticism of the speech's religious and moral overtones from the secular left?

Tags:
Nobel Prize,
religion

Reader Comments Read all comments (3)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Correction to previous post should read "'Would not necessarily'...qualify them to be a Christian."

Bill of NE 6:15PM December 11, 2009

It's not in my ability to determine whether President Obama is a Christian or not, and I'm not suggesting either. I agree the speech had religious overtones and reflected a Judeo-Christian ethic. However, I'm sure most Christians would say, just because someone simply believes in the fallen nature of man and being pro-war when necessary, qualifies them to be a Christian.

Again, this is not a statement on President Obama's faith system, but of columnist Kathleen Parker's reduction of defining someone's faith based on their adherents to one of the faiths tenants.

Bill of NE 6:11PM December 11, 2009

is not just composed of milktoast peaceniks, as implied here. And Sarah Palin, Newt Gingrich and other assorted hangers-on did not either win a peace prize or give the speech in Oslo. They can agree with Obama if they like, but they cannot somehow convince us with after-the-fact commentary that Obama is somehow following them. He is not---and that's why he has a peace prize and the American "right" has no such world recognition.

Everyone seems to want to forget that it was WE, the "secular left" who elected Obama to lead America while he spoke thoughout his campaign about the need to press harder with our military in Afghanistan. And, as we predicted with our votes, we're proud of him for having both "left" sense and "center" sense on this issue and every issue.

Muser of NM 3:29PM December 11, 2009

God & Country

U.S. News Weekly

Subscribe Now!

Order the new U.S. News Weekly digital magazine at a special low introductory price!

Dan Gilgoff covers religion for U.S. News & World Report. He is the author of The Jesus Machine: How James Dobson, Focus on the Family, and Evangelical America are Winning the Culture War, and is a former politics editor at beliefnet. E-mail Dan at godandcountry@usnews.com.

Is increasing access to healthcare a moral or faith-based cause?

View Results

Follow Dan Gilgoff on: Facebook | Twitter | MySpace

Photo Gallery

Faith Photo of the Day

See what's going on in the faith world across the globe every day.

SPECIAL REPORTS

Secrets of Islam

A guide to the world's fastest growing religion.

Sacred Places

Explore the significance, history, and enduring power of places people consider most sacred.

Women of the Bible

The "daughters of Eve" play many roles in the Old and New Testaments.