In Nobel Speech, Obama Argues Policies Conform to 'Just War' Theory

December 10, 2009 RSS Feed Print

By Dan Gilgoff, God & Country

Who would have guessed that President Obama's Nobel Peace Prize acceptance speech today would offer a defense of his war policy based on the philosophy of St. Augustine?

In his speech today in Oslo, Obama invoked "just war" theory early on, then subtly made the case that his war policies conform to its central tenets.

Augustine, a prolific fourth-century philosopher, is frequently cited as the father of just war theory, although the online Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy says its roots are a bit more convoluted. "[J]ust war theory is a synthesis of classical Greco-Roman, as well as Christian, values," according to the encyclopedia. "If we have to 'name names,' the founders of just war theory are probably the triad of Aristotle, Cicero, and Augustine."

Obama gave the thumbnail version of just war theory a few paragraphs into his speech:

Over time, as codes of law sought to control violence within groups, so did philosophers, clerics, and statesmen seek to regulate the destructive power of war. The concept of a "just war" emerged, suggesting that war is justified only when it meets certain preconditions: if it is waged as a last resort or in self-defense; if the forced used is proportional, and if, whenever possible, civilians are spared from violence.

For most of history, this concept of just war was rarely observed. The capacity of human beings to think up new ways to kill one another proved inexhaustible, as did our capacity to exempt from mercy those who look different or pray to a different God. Wars between armies gave way to wars between nations—total wars in which the distinction between combatant and civilian became blurred.

The president went on to argue that Afghanistan meets the first criteria of just war, self-defense, while not mentioning the current war in Iraq:

The world rallied around America after the 9/11 attacks, and continues to support our efforts in Afghanistan, because of the horror of those senseless attacks and the recognized principle of self-defense. Likewise, the world recognized the need to confront Saddam Hussein when he invaded Kuwait—a consensus that sent a clear message to all about the cost of aggression.

Though Obama didn't discuss whether the Afghanistan war meets just war theory's call for sparing civilians, he argued that his antiterrorism policies meet the theory's standard for proportional force and for the general conduct of war:

Where force is necessary, we have a moral and strategic interest in binding ourselves to certain rules of conduct. And even as we confront a vicious adversary that abides by no rules, I believe that the United States of America must remain a standard bearer in the conduct of war. That is what makes us different from those whom we fight. That is a source of our strength. That is why I prohibited torture. That is why I ordered the prison at Guantánamo Bay closed. And that is why I have reaffirmed America's commitment to abide by the Geneva Conventions. We lose ourselves when we compromise the very ideals that we fight to defend. And we honor those ideals by upholding them not just when it is easy, but when it is hard.

Tags:
Nobel Prize,
religion,
Barack Obama

Reader Comments Read all comments (6)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

An Unheard Lady GaGa Track was Unwrapped this morning with no traces of where it originated from.

Some say that it was leaked from GaGa's Record Label's headquarters.

More info at http://ladygagaunreleased.blogspot.com

Free Download of the single at http://tinyurl.com/gagaunreleased

gagaunreleased of AL 11:35PM December 29, 2009

Mr Obama'a policy concerning the war has nothing to do with moral ethics. First,his recent decision to put 30,000 troops, ( two thirds of those are support) is clearly an exit strategy. Yet he is telling our allies why all of us need to remain in Afganistan: puting forth an excellent arguement to justify putting 500,000 troops into the campaign for a long and ruthless effort to eliminate the enemy once and for all, (with heavy cost to the West and unfortunately heavier cost to the nation state of Afganistan). Since there is no possibility of such an extreme position ever being adopted unless the circumstances in the West are far worse than they presently are, bailing out has become the most pragmatic decision. But because of Mr. Obama's own rhetoric about the war, it cannot appear as what it is....bailing out. How moral is any decision that means the sacrifice of innocent people, young soldiers, national treasure??? No one knows what is the "right" thing to do....what is clear is the West is losing this war because we are in denial that any enemy really wants us wiped off the face of the earth, and any memory of us erased from history. Otherwise we would reform our own corruption from within and build a society that is not such as easy target by our extremist enemies. So much for "Manifest Destiny".

rb of MD 5:03PM December 11, 2009

Now that we're actually back to the self-defensive war, this can be wrapped up sooner rather than in years.

Knock on wood, because we still cannot afford this at this point. Too expensive.

Hoping This Surge Works of IL 10:17PM December 10, 2009

God & Country

U.S. News Weekly

Subscribe Now!

Order the new U.S. News Weekly digital magazine at a special low introductory price!

Dan Gilgoff covers religion for U.S. News & World Report. He is the author of The Jesus Machine: How James Dobson, Focus on the Family, and Evangelical America are Winning the Culture War, and is a former politics editor at beliefnet. E-mail Dan at godandcountry@usnews.com.

Is increasing access to healthcare a moral or faith-based cause?

View Results

Follow Dan Gilgoff on: Facebook | Twitter | MySpace

Photo Gallery

Faith Photo of the Day

See what's going on in the faith world across the globe every day.

SPECIAL REPORTS

Secrets of Islam

A guide to the world's fastest growing religion.

Sacred Places

Explore the significance, history, and enduring power of places people consider most sacred.

Women of the Bible

The "daughters of Eve" play many roles in the Old and New Testaments.