Your Thoughts on Kennedy's Tiff With His Bishop

November 25, 2009 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (36)

By Dan Gilgoff, God & Country

Lots of comments coming in on Rhode Island Rep. Patrick Kennedy's public tiff with the Roman Catholic bishop of Providence, with most siding with the bishop. One pattern I noticed in the comment thread: Those defending Providence Bishop Thomas Tobin's request that Kennedy forgo Communion because of his support for abortion rights (Kennedy said the bishop "instructed" him) are mostly active Catholics. Some of them urge Kennedy to go find another church.

Those sticking up for Kennedy, meanwhile, tend to be disaffected Catholics or antagonists of the church or of religion—folks who have found another church or who just left organized religion.

Does that mean that most Catholics side with Tobin, while Kennedy's backers are all Catholic adversaries? I wouldn't go that far. It's the outspoken voices on both sides that fit that pattern.

Here's Ron Calabrese of Illinois sticking up for Bishop Tobin:

I nominate the Bishop of Rhode Island for our next Pope, once the office is open. Too many so called "Catholics" feel they can interpret the teachings of the Church to their liking. The bishop is merely acting as the shepherd of his flock attempting to retrieve a lost sheep, Kennedy. Unfortunately, like many who allow intellectual pride to replace FAITH, Kennedy would rather grandstand and "nail proclamations to the church wall." Such lost souls bring scandal on the Church because the secular press repeatedly quotes their misguided meanderings. In a particularly appropriate biblical admonition, Christ says, "unless you become a child again, you will not enter the kingdom of heaven." A child is all believing and does not allow intellect to blind true Faith. That's why Faith is a gift not easily accepted.

And here's Mario da Penha of New York, a Tobin critic who also takes issue with the wider contemporary Catholic Church:

Christ meant for his Church to be composed of ordinary men and women like Rep. Kennedy, who compose the Universal Catholic Family and not just a few privileged men in the hierarchy like Bishop Tobin. Tobin should represent the "Rock" on which that Church rests, but it seems that in this century, that Rock has withered considerably.

How can men who supposedly have NO experience of family life make unilateral decisions about family life for the rest of their flock? And why are injunctions about abortion which were invented by the Church hierarchy in the nineteenth century, along with that infamous doctrine of Papal Infallibility invented in 1870, now being seen as timeless and eternal?

And in the process, why are the views of St. Augustine, that venerable Church Father, who believed that life begins at quickening and therefore abortion before that period is NOT murder, being suppressed?

The good bishop needs to consult a good Church history before he goes around wagging his tongue irresponsibly to the press! Shame on him!

J Vandemark of TX wants to send Kennedy packing:

You cannot be Catholic and Pro Choice. This is typical of people to try to change religion to fit their self conceived morals.

Kennedy should go start his own Protestant church, there are over 25,000 now to fit all the different self designed morals of people like Kennedy.

CD of Massachusetts says Bishop Tobin's behavior is indicative of the reasons she left the Catholic church:

I can't imagine that God would be as judgmental as our religious leaders. They are the reason that after years of Catholic School and the Catholic Church I no longer believe in organized religion. Leadership in the Catholic Church is just not representative of a true Christian attitude. I just find it hard to believe that so many of the trivial "rules" of the Catholic Church would really be supported by our Great God.

Tags:
Patrick Kennedy,
abortion,
religion

Reader Comments Read all comments (36)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Dear brethrens,

First receive our greetings from here Kenya under the Lord's name.

I am happy to contact you through this Email.I wish that we share in Christ and Denounce Satan.Iam from kenya and I love to kwow more about God.I request that you assist me materially christian litare with our church members and fellow christians.Pray for all of us and support us where possible.Be blessed always .

My names are Francis Mangera Ombogo

P.o.Box 298,Ogembo Gucha,Kenya.

Tel;+254729043006

father francis mangera ombogo of 12:36AM June 04, 2010

http://priestsforlife.org/magisterium/earlychurchfathers/fatherscover.html

As an Orthodox Christian, abortion and euthanasia are equally abhorrent to me. There is no doubt that Christian teaching from the beginning was against abortion. There is no doubt that prior to Christ's life, there were arguments, both theological and civil, against abortion.

If one is going to use Augustinian arguments to support abortion prior to 20 weeks, one must not, in the 21st century, determine what is meant by "quickening." The mother seldom feels the baby move prior to 20 weeks (in her first pregnancy), or prior to 18 weeks (in subsequent pregnancies). However, ultrasound shows the fetus moving as early as 6 weeks post conception. Even sucking his thumb. Does this change the date of quickening? The heart starts beating at approximately 5 weeks. Does the movement of the heart count as quickening?

If this is so, then by Augustinian argument, abortion cannot be performed after 5-6 weeks post conception - under any circumstances.

The Orthodox Church has always held that termination of pregnancy at any stage is sinful. It absolutely is murder to do so voluntarily. The soul of the baby, created from the souls of the mother and father just as the body is created from the sperm and ovum of the father and mother, is destroyed prematurely.

So abortion destroys the body and "unhouses" the soul of the baby. It is a violent ending for the baby, who does, indeed, suffer terribly when being pulled apart.

Lord, have mercy! Blessings upon the Manhattan Declaration coalition!

Elizabeth W. Riggs, PhD, RN of GA 7:32AM December 02, 2009

For all of you who do not believe in Catholic teaching and/or God in general, don't use the child molestation, the earth was flat or any other excuse to throw the baby out with the bath water(pun intended). Stick to the issue at hand and what the Bishop said and did not say. Patrick may believe in the one true church but obviously doesn't believe in its teachings. So if you can't take communion and don't believe go somewhere else. Rhode Island was founded on the right that everyone can believe as he chooses. Unlike present England and the other colonies in the early days there is no state church I am not Roman Catholic in a state that is 87% Catholic but I respect many of their views. If you don't believe in God and the sanctity of life then you are free to believe what you want. Those who are well versed in philosophy might want to surf the net and read Pascals wager. Do your homework before you go on spouting all the mistakes of the Catholic church. AAmen are sinners in need of the Great Physician to heal them. Much has been done in Jesus name that is evil but to those who want to know God and repent of their sins anyone is welcome believe or not.

compassion in RI of RI 6:00PM December 01, 2009

God & Country

Dan Gilgoff covers religion for U.S. News & World Report. He is the author of The Jesus Machine: How James Dobson, Focus on the Family, and Evangelical America are Winning the Culture War, and is a former politics editor at beliefnet. E-mail Dan at godandcountry@usnews.com.

advertisement