Rhode Island Bishop Thomas Tobin's Response to Rep. Patrick Kennedy

November 23, 2009 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (59)

By Dan Gilgoff, God & Country

It's really rare that a dispute between an elected official and the Roman Catholic Church plays out as publicly as the one happening now between Rhode Island Rep. Patrick Kennedy and Providence Bishop Thomas Tobin. After Kennedy, son of the late Sen. Ted Kennedy, revealed that Tobin asked him to forgo Holy Communion because of his pro-abortion rights stance—Kennedy said the bishop ordered him to skip Communion, though the bishop says it was a "request"—Tobin struck back with a very forceful statement yesterday, which I've pasted below.

Reading it, I have to wonder: Will this kind of nasty public back and forth between the church and elected officials become more commonplace, as a bigger handful of bishops speak out against Catholic politicians who support abortion rights? And if so, will a more publicly confrontational style on culture war issues strengthen the church's influence in politics and government or weaken it?

I am disappointed and really surprised that Congressman Patrick Kennedy has chosen to re-open the public discussion about his practice of the faith and his reception of Holy Communion.

This comes almost two weeks after the Congressman indicated to local media that he would no longer comment publicly on his faith or his relationship with the Catholic Church. The Congressman's public comments require me to reply.

On February 21, 2007, I wrote to Congressman Kennedy stating: "In light of the Church's clear teaching, and your consistent actions, therefore, I believe it is inappropriate for you to be receiving Holy Communion and I now ask respectfully that you refrain from doing so." My request came in light of the new statement of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops that said, "If a Catholic in his or her personal or professional life were knowingly and obstinately to repudiate her definite teachings on moral issues, he or she would seriously diminish his or her communion with the Church. Reception of Holy Communion in such a situation would not accord with the nature of the Eucharistic celebration, so that he or she should refrain." (Happy Are Those Who Are Called to His Supper, December, 2006)

In the same letter I wrote to Congressman Kennedy, "I am writing to you personally and confidentially as a pastor addressing a member of his flock . . . At the present time I have no need or intention to make this a public issue." I also indicated, "I am available to discuss this matter with you in person at any mutually convenient time and place. I would welcome the opportunity to do so."

On February 28, 2007, the Congressman responded to me, "I have the utmost respect for the work you do on behalf of the Catholic community in Rhode Island . . . I understand your pastoral advice was confidential in nature and given with the best intentions for my personal spiritual welfare."

I am disappointed that the Congressman would make public my pastoral and confidential request of nearly three years ago that sought to provide solely for his spiritual well-being.

I have no desire to continue the discussion of Congressman Kennedy's spiritual life in public. At the same time, I will absolutely respond publicly and strongly whenever he attacks the Catholic Church, misrepresents the teachings of the Church, or issues inaccurate statements about my pastoral ministry.

As I wrote to the Congressman in February of 2007, and repeated in my public letter earlier this month, I am willing and even anxious to meet with him, to discuss these matters. My door remains open. However, it should be absolutely clear the Congressman himself has once again chosen to make this discussion a matter of public record.

In the meantime, I will continue to pray—sincerely and fervently—for his conversion and repentance, and for his personal and spiritual well-being. I wish him well.

Tags:
religion

Reader Comments Read all comments (59)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Any time any one in ANY religion goes on record as saying that any member of Congress must vote on laws and bills using their religion as their guide it is a seperation of Church and State issue. The Bishop wanted it to remain so private that he gave quotes to every major news outlet condemning Kennedy for not following religious teachings with his votes. And also kept the story alive by continuing to call Kennedy out and try to bait him into a public debate.

John in PA of PA 11:15PM March 10, 2010

I admire,support and agree with Bishop Tobin,it takes courage standing up to a powerful,bigoted,left wing bias such as the hypocrite Kennedy family and R I liberal press.

Keep pressure on these lefty hypocrites

Victor L of DC 2:10AM February 12, 2010

This is not a issue of the Church trying to control the state - this is an issue of a pastor trying to fulfill his duties according to the teachings of the church both he and Kennedy belong to. Bihop Tom tried to keep this as a private matter, and knowing him personally in the years well before he was a bishop, I do not doubt his sincerity. But the point is this - if you're a person of faith, specifically the Catholic one, abortion has eternal implications that cannot separate oneself from, even if the courts refuse to decide when life begins, or choose a point after conception.

I don't claim to know when life begins personally, but without a clear understanding herself, the Catholic Church has chosen to go with the earliest possible moment under the idea of being "better safe than sorry". If you claim to believe in the teaching authority of the Church, as membership implies, you take a big risk spiritually the further if you push the starting point of life to the right pass conception. If you're a public figure using your membership in the church to gain political legitimacy with certain groups of voters, or even if you have no such selfish motivations for making your faith public, to promote a position on a life and death issue contrary to church teachings increases the spiritual risks for you, as well as millions of others that you may mislead by inferring that Catholics condone abortion. This is the point Bishop Tom was trying to make -PRIVATELY.

It's important to note that Bishop Tom did not forbid Kennedy from receiving communion - he asked the Congressman to refrain on his own as a matter of personal conscience. If Kennedy came to Tobin himself at Mass, he would still receive communion. Tobin is not trying to act as Kennedy' judge, he is trying to remind him that Catholics believe that they are ultimately answerable to a higher authority than either the US Constitution or the Catholic Church, neither of which can or do claim perfection.

Had to defend Bishop Tom on this one, and for your info, I am no longer a member o the Church because I differ on the Church's teachings on divorce, and ironically, I object to the Church's position on denying communion to those who fall outside certain criteria (we don't need to protect the almighty creator of heaven and earth from anyone). But Fr. Tom is not trying to impose church control on a politician; he's trying to get a follower to take personal responsibility for his faith. That' what I did, and it meant that I got out, still believing in God and the overall goodness of congregations of faith, but recognizing that they, like any human institution, are imperfect. I removed myself from membership out of respect for my differing personal beliefs, which I take ultimate responsibility for. Maybe Kennedy should do the same if he thinks the Church is wrong – or even wrong enough - on this one.

Dave L of PA 12:51PM February 07, 2010

God & Country

Dan Gilgoff covers religion for U.S. News & World Report. He is the author of The Jesus Machine: How James Dobson, Focus on the Family, and Evangelical America are Winning the Culture War, and is a former politics editor at beliefnet. E-mail Dan at godandcountry@usnews.com.

advertisement