Senate Healthcare Plan Lacks House Bill's Strict Abortion Funding Ban

November 19, 2009 RSS Feed Print

By Dan Gilgoff, God & Country

Now that Sen. Harry Reid has released the Senate version of the healthcare bill, the two main sides in the culture war—abortion rights advocates and foes—are back to their usual corners.

The House healthcare bill's strict ban on federally subsidized abortion coverage earned Democrats the wrath of their abortion rights allies and praise from abortion opponents. The Senate healthcare plan lacks the language of the House's Stupak-Pitts amendment, which prohibits abortion coverage in the public plan and from private plans receiving government subsidies; instead, it has language that hews closer to the House's scuttled Capps amendment, which allows abortion coverage in the public plan and in private plans receiving federal dollars as long as the money comes from pooled private premiums. (Abortion opponents call it an accounting trick.)

A quick roundup of reaction: In a statement, NARAL Pro-Choice America said that its president, Nancy Keenan, "is encouraged that the Senate bill does not include the extreme new anti-choice restrictions adopted by the U.S. House" but protested the bill's continuation of the longstanding ban on federal money for abortion.

"[T]he legislation includes a compromise that continues existing laws that unfairly single out abortion care, including a ban on federal funding," the NARAL statement continued, suggesting that abortion rights supporters will frame the Senate version of the bill as a compromise that keeps them from moving any further to the right on the issue.

Douglas Johnson, legislative director for the National Right to Life Committee, had the opposite reaction to the Senate bill. "Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid has rejected the bipartisan Stupak-Pitts amendment," he said in a statement, "and has substituted completely unacceptable language that would result in coverage of abortion on demand in two big new federal government programs."

Conservative Catholic League President Bill Donohue went further:

Obama has decided to renege on his promise, betray the bishops and defy the American people. Risky business given that today's Rasmussen presidential tracking poll shows only 46 percent of voters approve of Obama's performance. . . . Wait until the public learns about Obama's double cross on abortion!

Interesting to note that the House bill started out with similar abortion language but that a much stiffer ban on abortion funding was adopted during the floor vote. Abortion rights groups are hellbent on ensuring the same thing doesn't happen in the Senate.

Tags:
abortion,
healthcare,
religion,
healthcare reform

Reader Comments Read all comments (9)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Marilyn's post, like so many about health care bills on all sites, is a composite of false and confused statements. It is not her fault; a possibly controlling proportion of American voters has (not for the first time) been manipulated into voting against all our best interests as to health care delivery. At least she identifies her statements as "rumors."

Bill, on the other hand, is less naive. He is simply pushing to anti-health-care-delivery-reform game of dragging it out until it dies of natural causes.

Fiona Mackenzie of AZ 6:08PM March 03, 2010

I believe American citizens should have the right to examine these plans. I have heard rumors Obama's plan would include coverage for illegal immigrants who will not have to pay for the benefits and also do not pay taxes, that individuals will not have the rights to determine what kind of treatment they will receive and families will not decide whether life preserving measures be taken. I do not believe decisions of this nature should be determined by government. It is unfair for every doctor to be paid the same amount as their education, skill, and techniques are different.

I believe the plans will interfere with individual rights and freedoms. Our government has moved from the democratic nation and eliminated almost every idea regarding freedom of religion and we are headed towards a socialist nation. I am very opposed to this. We need to concentrate on the American citizens and forget about giving illegal immigrants citizenship. Our government is attempting to destroy the concept of democracy and is more concerned about non-American citizens than our own people.

While we appear to be fighting in other countries for people's government/democracy our own nation is moving in a direction which is contrary to this.

I have lost much faith in our political leaders and particularly the President. I do not believe they are truly concerned about the American citizens. We have American citizens who are unable to feed their families and maintain a decent living standard but there is more concern for the illegal immigrants than these families. Politicians are more concerned with staying in power than dealing with our own crisis.

Marilyn R. Heniff of IL 12:01PM February 25, 2010

The entire health bill should be put out for public review for a min. of six mo. for public scrunity. and then should be placed on a national ballot and the people allowed to vote on the plan.

Bill Rhodes of TX 6:24PM December 14, 2009

God & Country

U.S. News Weekly

Subscribe Now!

Order the new U.S. News Weekly digital magazine at a special low introductory price!

Dan Gilgoff covers religion for U.S. News & World Report. He is the author of The Jesus Machine: How James Dobson, Focus on the Family, and Evangelical America are Winning the Culture War, and is a former politics editor at beliefnet. E-mail Dan at godandcountry@usnews.com.

Is increasing access to healthcare a moral or faith-based cause?

View Results

Follow Dan Gilgoff on: Facebook | Twitter | MySpace

Photo Gallery

Faith Photo of the Day

See what's going on in the faith world across the globe every day.

SPECIAL REPORTS

Secrets of Islam

A guide to the world's fastest growing religion.

Sacred Places

Explore the significance, history, and enduring power of places people consider most sacred.

Women of the Bible

The "daughters of Eve" play many roles in the Old and New Testaments.