Home > News > God & Country > Ray Comfort Responds to Genie Scott on Creationist 'Origin of Species'

Ray Comfort Responds to Genie Scott on Creationist 'Origin of Species'

Reader Comments
Back to blog

Very interesting blog, love it! Really enjoyed reading your articles!

Miami escorts of FL 10:58PM August 25, 2011

It was certainly interesting for me to read the blog. Thanks for it. I like such topics and anything connected to this matter. I would like to read more on that blog soon. BTW, rather good design that site has, but don’t you think design should be changed once in a few months?
Natasha Pingtown

london escort girls of AL 10:30PM July 06, 2010

I'm afraid the contributions of Mr. Comfort offer little comfort to creationists. Truly the arguments he raises to defend the creationist cause are laughable. In actual fact, Ray Comfort strengthens the "Evolutionists cause" every time he opens his mouth... or puts pen to paper!

Frank Mundo of ME 9:34AM May 09, 2010

Interesting article you got here. I'd like to read more concerning that matter. Thanx for sharing this information.

StephanJade of AL 9:11PM March 09, 2010

Non-living matter has never been observed creating living matter.
No spiritual being has ever been observed creating complex living things out of nothing( like Ray comfort believes in)
"There are numerous physical similarities between animals today. Doesn't mean one evolved from the other. "
No, transitional species share features in common between TWO groups such as dinosaurs and birds. How stupid are you?

Chris Mankey of MN 2:52PM March 06, 2010

I admit a lot of the FACT of evolution can be hard to understand, but it is absolutely hilarious for creationists to call it a "fairy tale".
Which sounds less likely:
Some all-knowing supreme being nobody can see or hear, that cannot be proven to even exist (by today's standards), magically created everything in the world to co-mingle together in 6 days.
Over billions of years, small organisms started to adapt to their environments, building on one another (and thus being totally dependent on each other). ECO SYSTEM.
You have to realize that the most miniscule of percentages of fossils even survive in the first place. Mutations happen in a incredibly small fraction of species. Every living thing on this Earth is an intermediate species. Believe whatever you want, but at the end of the day we all know which theory is the most LOGICCCALLLL

Nate of NE 12:38PM November 27, 2009

Mark, your very objections in your posts reveal your misunderstandings of evolution from the get-go. Both Richard Forrest and I have dealt with your repeated post on at least three other threads. They have also already been dealt on the very threads you posted on, and would have noticed this if you just read a few pages back.
So I repeat, what *scientific* alternative do you propose that can do the job better than evolution?

Nick 8:12AM November 26, 2009

Non-living matter has never been observed creating living matter.
Never has a creature been observed giving birth to an entirely new species. Never! It simply does not exist in the fossil record. Nor at any time in recorded history. Therefore, macro-evolution is an unsupported theory at best and a grown man’s fantasy at worst.
Macro-evolution is a fantasy: fish->amphibian->reptile->rodent->ape->human being. No proof.
If macro-evolution were true, there would be as many intermediate species as there are “completed” species in the fossil record. In fact, there would be more intermediate species than “completed,” since “completed” is the final form, but it would take thousands, if not millions, of intermediates to reach the “completed” form. However, proof of intermediates does not exist. What exists is speculation that some creatures may be intermediates due to physical similarities. Again, not proof. There are numerous physical similarities between animals today. Doesn't mean one evolved from the other.
Evolution = FANTASY.

mark of CA 12:26AM November 26, 2009

Karl Meyer-Haus, I take it then that you have no scientific critique to offer?

Nick 7:36AM November 25, 2009

As a professor I discovered something quite remarkable re evolution. As you know, science books often portray mankind's "stages" stretching over a long period of time from a naked, hairy, bent-over, mentally-deficient Neanderthal-type which gradually stands upright more and more until he is standing erect with a 1930's-style haircut. Well, I discovered that someone accidentally reversed that sketch! That's correct! Mankind actually began as the short-haired erect man and gradually became more hairy and bent over and naked etc. until today we can observe the last "stage" at any rock concert! Since I believe in humility I have resisted revealing this astounding discovery until now. Karl Meyer-Haus

Karl Meyer-Haus of KS 10:00PM November 24, 2009