Quote of the Week: '49 Percent Says Homosexual Behavior Is Morally Wrong'

October 9, 2009 RSS Feed Print

By Dan Gilgoff, God & Country

"The poll also finds that half of the public (49 percent) says homosexual behavior is morally wrong, while 9 percent say it is morally acceptable and 35 percent say it is not a moral issue."

—From a Pew poll out today on recognition for gay relationships

Tags:
religion,
polls

Reader Comments Read all comments (64)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Thanks so much for all of your Bible versus. What about:

a) When I burn a bull on the altar as a sacrifice, I know it creates a pleasing odor for the Lord (Lev 1:9). The problem is my neighbors. They claim the odor is not pleasing to them. Should I smite them?

b) I would like to sell my daughter into slavery, as sanctioned in Exodus 21:7. In this day and age, what do you think would be a fair price for her?

c) I know that I am allowed no contact with a woman while she is in her period of menstrual uncleanliness (Lev 15:19-24). The problem is, how do I tell? I have tried asking, but most women take offense.

d) Lev. 25:44 states that I may indeed possess slaves, both male and female, provided they are purchased from neighboring nations. A friend of mine claims that this applies to Mexicans, but not Canadians. Can you clarify? Why can't I own Canadians?

e) I have a neighbor who insists on working on the Sabbath. Exodus 35:2 clearly states he should be put to death. Am I morally obligated to kill him myself?

f) A friend of mine feels that even though eating shellfish is an Abomination (Lev 11:10), it is a lesser abomination than homosexuality. I don't agree. Can you settle this?

g) Lev 21:20 states that I may not approach the altar of God if I have a defect in my sight. I have to admit that I wear reading glasses. Does my vision have to be 20/20, or is there some wiggle room here?

h) Most of my male friends get their hair trimmed, including the hair around their temples, even though this is expressly forbidden by Lev 19:27. How should they die?

i) I know from Lev 11:6-8 that touching the skin of a dead pig makes me unclean, but may I still play football if I wear gloves?

j) My uncle has a farm. He violates Lev 19:19 by planting two different crops in the same field, as does his wife by wearing garments made of two different kinds of thread (cotton/polyester blend). He also tends to curse and blaspheme a lot. Is it really necessary that we go to all the trouble of getting the whole town together to stone them? (Lev 24:10-16) Couldn't we just burn them to death at a private family affair like we do with people who sleep with their in-laws? (Lev. 20:14)

Kevin of CA 7:07AM October 24, 2009

In my rant to auradawn, I failed to mention my stance on the issue of homosexuality. I believe the Bible is the inerrant word of God. It is both literal and figurative. The books that are figurative are written using figurative literary devices, such as similes, metaphors, and personification. Such books include the books of poetry and the books of prophecy. However, the books that are literal are the books that do not use literary devices - otherwise, they would be figurative. Lack of literary devices prevents these books from being interpreted figuratively; doing so would be a misuse of the language, something not even permissible in Standard American English or any other languages. That being said, at least four of the books that address homosexuality do not use figurative literary devices; therefore, they are not figurative. These books are literal books. They are meant to be taken as such. Leviticus 18 is explicit in God's stance on homosexuality. "Thou shall not lie with mankind as with womankind; this is an abomination." There are NO figurative devices in this language. Lev. 23 goes on to give the punishment for such behavior. "...they shall be put to death; their blood shall be on their own heads." Again, there is NO figurative device in this language. Romans 1 repeats this, as does 1 Corinthians and Jude. Similarly, the same way these books do NOT use figurative language, neither do the gospels (outside of Jesus' parables). Yet, many of us still profess that His death, burial, and resurrection were literal acts, which is expected since those passages do NOT use figurative language. If we accept those passages as truth based on their use of literal language, we must do the same with the mandates regarding homosexuality. Otherwise, we are being partial, unfair and hypocritical. The Bible condemns homosexuality, going as far as to say that those who practice it WILL die and are worthy of their punishment. Instead of denying this and rejecting this (for those of us who claim to believe the Bible) we must pray for homosexuals, love them as we are called to love our neighbors, and give them God's truth in love. We must also be thankful for God's grace over our lives and share the Good News with people who are seeking the love of a Savior but don't know how to get it. We must not lie to homosexuals because when we know the truth and deny it, it is better that we never knew it at all. We are lukewarm, and Jesus will spew us out of His mouth. Bottom line: we were created to love, honor, and glorify a holy righteous God Who hates sin. Homosexuality is a sin (amongst others) and God finds it abominable. We are not here for ourselves. When we want to make the rules, we can go and create our own planet. Until then, God, the Creator of this planet said it is a sin and people who practice it will die. He makes the rules. He is right, and honestly, that's all that matters.

sweetie21783 of DC 9:00PM October 18, 2009

auradawn is interesting. You say that atheists have self-respect, yet you believe that you are here by some cataclysmic accident! You don't believe that you actually have a purpose, because something that's an accident has no intention. You actually have NO need for self-respect, self-value, self-worth, self-love, others-respect, others-value, others-worth, or others-love because you, my friend, are an accident (according to you). If you believe this, you also believe that you are a pointless waste of space and are undeserving of life. You MUST believe this to prevent yourself from being a hypocrite. So how does it feel to know that, according to you, because you are the result of an accident, you serve NO purpose in life whatsoever and might as well die today, because of your purposeless self? Another option would be to believe that an Almighty Creator, Who loves you more than you an even begin to fathom, imagine, or articulate, left His throne in heaven to die for your sins - that this awesome, majestic, sovereign, just God, created you with a purpose in mind? That you are worthy of love because of His grace? That you are special to Him? That you can be His child and rest in His peace for the rest of your life? That you are capable of loving others and yourself because you know the mighty love of the Almighty God? That you are not the product of some happenstance cataclysmic accident? I don't know about you, but I'll receive truth - truth that sets free. My God loves me!

sweetie21783 of DC 8:32PM October 18, 2009

God & Country

U.S. News Weekly

Subscribe Now!

Order the new U.S. News Weekly digital magazine at a special low introductory price!

Dan Gilgoff covers religion for U.S. News & World Report. He is the author of The Jesus Machine: How James Dobson, Focus on the Family, and Evangelical America are Winning the Culture War, and is a former politics editor at beliefnet. E-mail Dan at godandcountry@usnews.com.

Is increasing access to healthcare a moral or faith-based cause?

View Results

Follow Dan Gilgoff on: Facebook | Twitter | MySpace

Photo Gallery

Faith Photo of the Day

See what's going on in the faith world across the globe every day.

SPECIAL REPORTS

Secrets of Islam

A guide to the world's fastest growing religion.

Sacred Places

Explore the significance, history, and enduring power of places people consider most sacred.

Women of the Bible

The "daughters of Eve" play many roles in the Old and New Testaments.