Dan Gilgoff, God & Country
The big antiabortion groups, including the National Right to Life Committee and the Family Research Council, weighed in last night on Sen. Max Baucus's newly unveiled healthcare reform proposal. Both organizations blasted it as a mandate and taxpayer subsidy for abortion coverage.
For a White House that doesn't want to see the healthcare reform derailed by the abortion debate—and for an antiabortion movement that doesn't want the Obama administration to get away with selling Democratic healthcare proposals as "abortion neutral"—the next big political question is how the Roman Catholic bishops will react to the Baucus proposal. Both the antiabortion movement and the White House want the U.S. bishops on their side.
The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops attacked the House Democrats' bill, calling its ban on federal funds for abortion a "legal fiction."
But after President Obama's address to Congress last week, in which he dismissed as a "misunderstanding" the allegation that healthcare reform would mean federally funded abortion, the bishops applauded.
"We especially welcome the president's commitment to exclude federal funding of abortion and to maintain existing federal laws protecting conscience rights in healthcare," said Richard Doerflinger, the conference's associate director of antiabortion activities. "We believe that incorporating essential and long-standing federal laws on these issues into any new proposal will strengthen support for healthcare reform."
That positive take provoked harsh words from Catholic conservatives, including Deal Hudson, former head of Catholic outreach for the Republican National Committee. "Doerflinger's statement is perplexing because it avoids the fact that Obama denied abortion coverage was contained in the present legislation," Hudson wrote in a column for Inside Catholic, a website he runs. "Obama was clearly wrong about that statement, but Doerflinger lauds 'the president's commitment to exclude federal funding of abortion.' "
The Baucus proposal includes important differences from the House bill, such as the absence of a public health insurance plan, but its language on a purported separation of federal funds from abortion coverage is similar. Conservatives call it a bogus scheme.
Let's see what the bishops say.
- See Obama's top faith leaders.
- Read more about abortion.





Reader Comments Read all comments (14)
ComPassion of IN 10:48AM October 17, 2009
Romase of MO 8:29PM October 03, 2009
Globals of NV 10:00PM October 02, 2009