Religious Progressives Raise Concerns About Abortion in Healthcare Reform

September 9, 2009 RSS Feed Print

By Dan Gilgoff, God & Country

Conservative Christians have spent weeks decrying Democratic plans for healthcare reform over allegations that the proposals will increase abortion coverage, but recent days have seen a different camp raising abortion-related concerns in the healthcare fight: left-leaning religious activists.

Progressive faith leaders and organizations are pushing hard for healthcare reform along the lines that President Obama has articulated, but some of the most prominent have grown concerned with the House healthcare bill's provisions for abortion coverage in the public health insurance plan.

They object to pooled premiums of those participating in the public plan going to abortion coverage for others in the plan, as laid out in the House healthcare bill. Americans who are opposed to abortion, the activists say, shouldn't be forced to pay for abortion procedures for others with their premiums.

Other faith-based liberals object to the House bill's authorization of the Department of Health and Human Services to decide which types of abortions are covered by the public option.

These religious activists, while opposed to much of the religious right's agenda, are pressuring the White House and Capitol Hill Democrats to revise the amendment to the House bill that deals with abortion, authored by California Rep. Lois Capps. One idea is to offer a second public option that excludes abortion coverage. Another is to offer a supplemental insurance rider for those who want abortion coverage.

"The Capps amendment successfully addresses the vast majority of concerns the moderate pro-life community has raised regarding conscience protections and abortion funding in healthcare reform," says Chris Korzen, executive director of the influential progressive group Catholics United. "The question of how to handle abortion coverage in the public option has proven more difficult to answer."

Stephen Schneck, a Catholic University of America professor who has advised the White House on Roman Catholic issues, is also urging Democrats to revise the House bill. "There needs to be more of a straightforward effort to defend the Hyde amendment," he says, referring to a decades-old law that prevents federal funds from going to abortions. "If we are stuck with the Capps amendment, we are going to have problems."

Conservative Christian activists have objected to Democratic healthcare reform proposals, and the Capps amendment specifically, on broader grounds. They oppose the very idea of a stepped-up government role in healthcare. And they say the Capps amendment's ban on federal funds for abortion in private health insurance plans receiving government assistance under the House bill is a "paper fiction."

Progressive religious activists, by contrast, generally favor a robust public option in healthcare reform and stand by the Capps amendment's ban on federal funds for abortion in the private plans.

But left-leaning activists are worried that without revising abortion provisions in the public option, the debate over abortion can bring down the whole healthcare reform effort. "As Catholics, we recognize that dramatically shifting the way we fund abortion is problematic not only for us, but also is the wrong way to go politically in terms of reaching consensus with pro-life members of Congress," says John Gehring, deputy communications director for the liberal group Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good. "It's definitely a sticking point, and it would be unfair to characterize it only as a conservative concern."

Progressive faith groups have been an important part of the Democratic coalition pushing for healthcare reform, making a moral case for the effort in the face of opposition from conservative religious activists and lending organizing muscle. Last month, President Obama joined a conference call with 140,000 religious Americans aimed at galvanizing support for healthcare reform.

Religious activists on the left say that the White House and some Hill Democrats are receptive to their abortion concerns. "We are hopeful that all sides in the abortion debate can find a common-ground solution to this particular challenge," says Catholics United's Korzen.

Many others on the left, however, are standing by the House healthcare bill's abortion provisions. The progressive think tank Third Way sent a memo to Congress last week arguing that the bill would reduce abortions by expanding the number of women who receive health insurance that covers contraception.

Aides to Representative Capps say her amendment expands options for antiabortion Americans by requiring at least one plan participating in a new government-controlled health insurance exchange to exclude abortion coverage. "About 90 percent of Americans participating in employer-based healthcare have a plan that offers elective abortion services," says Capps spokeswoman Emily Kryder. "The Capps amendment gives them more choice."

And the Capps amendment's defenders note that the public option may not be the least expensive plan in the government health insurance exchange, so that cost-conscious Americans wouldn't necessarily be forced into a plan that uses their premiums to pay for abortion. Many progressive religious groups want that guarantee in writing, in the reform of a revised House bill.

Tags:
abortion,
healthcare reform,
religion,
healthcare

Reader Comments Read all comments (14)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Ditto Truth:

If the dems want to pass a Health Care bill, a significant step would be language that Abortion Funding will not be included.

Also get rid of language forcing Doctors to discuss End of Life Decisions and eliminate the role of unelected appointed "Bioethics Panels" in patient discission making. Patient care should be between the patient, the physician and the Family.

If they did these things it would eliminate the morally objectionable issues about these proposed bills. That wouldn't make the bills otherwise prudent -this is one area that we need to take our time to have a true conversation about what the Country needs. But it would permit a more rational discussion of the other provisions contemplated.

Faustina of MD 1:36PM September 10, 2009

The Health Care Bill does not exclude abortion funding.

Abortion is slaughter of 3200 babies a day and 1.2 Million a year in American.

Abortion is the #1 cause of death in America.

In 36 years America has slaughter 9 times more babies to abortion than all the people Hitler killed in concentration camps. Abortion is a holocaust.

This is the Truth as written by a christian. This is not a Republican, Democrat, Independent issue. It is a moral issue and question about what America sees as most important. Our wants and comfort for health care should not leave the door open for the slaughter of abortion.

If there were no hidden agenda to support abortion then it would simple be explicit in the bill. They could write it in easy. They could write: Abortion will in no way be supported or funded by this bill.

They are attempting to hide the support of abortion and don't want to address it because it is ugly. America is better than this and the majority of us don't want abortion as part of our health care plan. We know it is wrong.

Stand firm until they are explicit with wording in the bill that abortion is not in the Health Care Bill.

Abortion is not health care. Abortion is war against Life. Abortion is wrong.

An unborn baby is the weakest, poorest, most depended, most needy, and least of our people. How do we treat our poor? Do they get a choice? Do we show them Love?

Love does not destroy.

This is the Truth that Christian Leaders are speaking. They are telling the Truth to protect Life.

Seek the Truth. Speak the Truth. Share the Truth. Defend the Truth.

The Truth will set us free.

Respect, Protect, and Love Life.

ComPassion of IN 7:28AM September 10, 2009

Social justice is just a buzz word pro-abortionist use to try to shame people into supporting socialized medicine. If social justice doesn't begin in your mother's womb, when do you think it should begin?

Cecilia of GA 7:04AM September 10, 2009

God & Country

U.S. News Weekly

Subscribe Now!

Order the new U.S. News Weekly digital magazine at a special low introductory price!

Dan Gilgoff covers religion for U.S. News & World Report. He is the author of The Jesus Machine: How James Dobson, Focus on the Family, and Evangelical America are Winning the Culture War, and is a former politics editor at beliefnet. E-mail Dan at godandcountry@usnews.com.

Is increasing access to healthcare a moral or faith-based cause?

View Results

Follow Dan Gilgoff on: Facebook | Twitter | MySpace

Photo Gallery

Faith Photo of the Day

See what's going on in the faith world across the globe every day.

SPECIAL REPORTS

Secrets of Islam

A guide to the world's fastest growing religion.

Sacred Places

Explore the significance, history, and enduring power of places people consider most sacred.

Women of the Bible

The "daughters of Eve" play many roles in the Old and New Testaments.