Poll: Is Increasing Healthcare Access a Moral/Religious Issue?

September 8, 2009 RSS Feed Print

By Dan Gilgoff, God & Country

Progressive religious voices are pushing back at conservatives who allege that Democratic healthcare reform proposals will expand access to abortion by arguing that increasing access to healthcare is itself a deeply moral issue. Some call it a religious issue.

What do you think?

Is increasing access to healthcare a moral or faith-based cause?



View Results
Tags:
healthcare reform,
religion,
healthcare

Reader Comments Read all comments (21)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

While I may believe as a Christian that I have a duty to show my love for God by caring for the unfortunate among my neighbors, the government is NOT the representative or agent of God. It does not have authority to define what my moral and religious duties are, nor to enforce them, nor carry them out against my will.

What about the moral duty "Thou shalt not murder"? President Obama endorses the continuation of unrestricted abortion at the whim of the "mother", up to the very point that the child is emerging naturally from the womb. There should be a name for such women that does not apply to those women who carry their babies to term and love and care for them at great sacrifice. He claimed during the campaign that denying women the ability to kill their own children would be above his pay grade. If he had been running as the Democrat in the election of 1860, instead of Stephen Douglas, would he have disclaimed any ability to make a moral judgment about slavery? When did President Obama repeal one of the Ten Commandments, while claiming that his political opponents were guilty of vilating the commandment "Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbor"? Apparently President Obama gets to pick and choose which of God's commandments he will obey, but he denies the rest of us that option.

He has a twisted sense of scripture. In his discussion about health care with ministers and rabbis, he claimed that Americans have a duty to be "their brothers' keeper, their sisters' keeper." Where is that in scripture? It was a statement made by Cain after he murdered his brother Abel, and was confonted by God, who asked him where his brother Abel was. Both God and Cain knew Cain's guilt, but Cain chose to make the hyperbolic statement "Am I my brother's keeper?" Cain referred to Abel as if he were an animal, to be "kept" and controlled by Cain. God nowhere commanded Cain, or anyone else, to be Abel's "keeper". While there are commands to "love thy neighbor", we are not commanded to take complete responsibility for the care and feeding of anyone beyond our own families. Indeed, God could well ask the women who procure unnecessary abortions "Where is your child?" And if they responded "Am I my child's keeper?" God could answer "Yes". But the consistent application of a principle is not Reverend Obama's strong suit.

Reverend Obama's version of the Parable of the Good Samaritan would have the Samaritan leave the robbery victim by the roadside while he ran ahead on the trail to Jerusalem and demanded that the Priest and the Levite give him money to help the poor man. Obama wants to be compassionate with other people's money.

In his discussion with the ministers, Obama said that Americans were obligated to pay for other people's health care because they are "wealthy". Is this the same president who said the current economic crisis is the worst since the Great Depression? He is a liar, or suffering Fiscal Schizophrenia.

Raymond Takashi Swenson of WA 12:28PM September 10, 2009

No one disputes the value of charity. But does anyone really believe that we should all live under the belief that if we fail to provide for ourselves, someone else will?

It's easy to say that everyone for everyone should be provided--from food to health care, to housing and transportation (heck, that's why all these bus services in small towns operate, isn't it?). But where does this end, where does personal responsibility begin?

Let's be honest here. No one is denied health care. When people are sick or want something, they just show up at the emergency rooms of our nation's hospitals and they are treated. No one is talking about that. Somehow what we are talking about is a government-run health care system that will, in fact, ration care for seniors, tax those with the ability to get (such as union members) or pay for (such as the more affluent) the better health care plans. Worse, the president is proposing the 'public option' which is, as we know, a government takeover. How is that? Because any business can simply pay 8% of its costs to the government and throw everyone on the business health plan off. As health care actually costs businesses more than that as a percentage of costs, two things will happen--1) many people will lose their company health care right away, 2) people, including the young or those who do not want it as they are self insured will have to buy health insurance, and 3) our government will go deeper into debt.

The goal of this administration is to increasingly substitute personal responsibility to take care of yourself for government planned and run everything. Bill Clinton ended welfare as we know it; Barack Obama is bringing it back with a vengeance. When the government provides, people will become more and more dependent. The personal responsibility, personal freedom and independence that built America is rapidly vanishing.

sherlock Holmes of NH 12:06PM September 10, 2009

The Health Care Bill does not exclude abortion funding.

Abortion is slaughter of 3200 babies a day and 1.2 Million a year in American.

Abortion is the #1 cause of death in America.

In 36 years America has slaughter 9 times more babies to abortion than all the people Hitler killed in concentration camps. Abortion is a holocaust.

This is the Truth as written by a christian. This is not a Republican, Democrat, Independent issue. It is a moral issue and question about what America sees as most important. Our wants and comfort for health care should not leave the door open for the slaughter of abortion.

If there were no hidden agenda to support abortion then it would simple be explicit in the bill. They could write it in easy. They could write: Abortion will in no way be supported or funded by this bill.

They are attempting to hide the support of abortion and don't want to address it because it is ugly. America is better than this and the majority of us don't want abortion as part of our health care plan. We know it is wrong.

Stand firm until they are explicit with wording in the bill that abortion is not in the Health Care Bill.

Abortion is not health care. Abortion is war against Life. Abortion is wrong.

An unborn baby is the weakest, poorest, most depended, most needy, and least of our people. How do we treat our poor? Do they get a choice? Do we show them Love?

Love does not destroy.

This is the Truth that Christian Leaders are speaking. They are telling the Truth to protect Life.

Seek the Truth. Speak the Truth. Share the Truth. Defend the Truth.

The Truth will set us free.

Respect, Protect, and Love Life.

ComPassion of IN 7:30AM September 10, 2009

God & Country

U.S. News Weekly

Subscribe Now!

Order the new U.S. News Weekly digital magazine at a special low introductory price!

Dan Gilgoff covers religion for U.S. News & World Report. He is the author of The Jesus Machine: How James Dobson, Focus on the Family, and Evangelical America are Winning the Culture War, and is a former politics editor at beliefnet. E-mail Dan at godandcountry@usnews.com.

Is increasing access to healthcare a moral or faith-based cause?

View Results

Follow Dan Gilgoff on: Facebook | Twitter | MySpace

Photo Gallery

Faith Photo of the Day

See what's going on in the faith world across the globe every day.

SPECIAL REPORTS

Secrets of Islam

A guide to the world's fastest growing religion.

Sacred Places

Explore the significance, history, and enduring power of places people consider most sacred.

Women of the Bible

The "daughters of Eve" play many roles in the Old and New Testaments.