At Doug Kmiec's Swearing-In, Strange Religious/Political Bedfellows

September 3, 2009 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (13)

By Dan Gilgoff, God & Country

Imagine a Washington event that opens with Martin Sheen—aka The West Wing's Josiah Bartlett—reciting the Pledge of Allegiance. Though a Democrat occupies the White House, the event is a swearing-in for a former highly placed aide to President Reagan who has been plucked for an ambassador's post. The ambassador-to-be is introduced by Joshua DuBois, a Pentecostal minister whom the Democratic president has picked to run the White House's faith-based office.

The Obama administration's faith outreach operation can make for some pretty bizarre scenes.

The event was yesterday's swearing-in of Douglas Kmiec, who led Reagan's Office of Legal Counsel but managed to become Barack Obama's highest-profile Roman Catholic surrogate on the campaign trail last year, as the new ambassador to Malta. It felt like an official diocesan event with a twist.

The president of Catholic University of America, the Rev. David M. O'Connell, gave the opening prayer. "We still think of you as one of us," Father O'Connell told Kmiec, a former dean of Catholic University's law school. With some conservative Catholics having called Kmiec's religious bona fides into question for having endorsed Obama—he was denied Communion last year—the remark carried poignancy.

Sheen, a fellow parishioner of Kmiec's at Our Lady of Malibu Catholic Church in Southern California, led the Pledge of Allegiance, ending it in an unusual way, with an emphatic "amen." Someone in the audience whispered, "Martin went to Catholic school."

Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito, a friend of Kmiec's from their time together in Reagan's Justice Department, approached the podium to deliver the oath. "We're missing an important book," Kmiec deadpanned, and a State Department aide ran to fetch a Bible.

Kmiec was formally introduced by DuBois. DuBois spoke of Obama's election last year as an instance of one of the three theological virtues, hope, at work. He said Kmiec exhibited another of those virtues, faith, calling him "a fellow worker in the vineyard of interfaith understanding."

When it was his turn to speak, Kmiec told of a phone call he'd received last year from DuBois—then serving as candidate Obama's faith outreach director—on the day he came out for Obama in an article for Slate. "Are you for real?" DuBois had asked.

"I've heard a lot of that" since endorsing Obama, Kmiec said.

"[Dubois] welcomed me to the fold despite my previous suspect life," he continued. By way of a contrast, he took a thinly veiled swipe at the opposition that President Obama's May appearance at the University of Notre Dame generated among conservative Catholics. "We live at a time," Kmiec said, "when even at some great universities, a spirit of narrow-mindedness sets in over a spirit of inquiry."

Kmiec had some kind words for Malta, a tiny island nation in the Mediterranean Sea, before a receiving line formed to wish the new ambassador well. Liberal religious types from Washington Post columnist E.J. Dionne to evangelical activist Jim Wallis, who had long urged the Democratic Party to reach out to religious folks—even conservatives—lined up to shake hands with Kmiec.

Tags:
Doug Kmiec,
religion

Reader Comments Read all comments (13)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

To hear someone who claims to be Catholic describe opposition to abortion as "a spirit of narrow-mindedness," makes me doubt his understanding of Catholicism. Not his faith, mind you, that is between Mr. Kmiec and the Almighty, but his grasp of the religion's tenets. There is evil in the world, and when people reject evil and are chided for not being accepting of the validity of the viewpoint that permits this evil, perhaps Mr. Kmiec has enlightened himself in ways that others choose not to. How very nice, in any case. The President needed a "surrogate" to give him some street cred with the praying masses, and so he trades an ambassadorship for some kind words. I'm not sure how this makes Kmiec's support for the President look like anything more than the quid pro quo that it clearly is. The good news is that as the ambassador to Malta, at least Kmiec will not be much of a position to do further damage to our Country or to Catholicism.

Tommy Paine of NJ 3:05PM September 21, 2009

Dear Catholics:

When it is time to promote/support/vote, we have a moral and ethical responsibility as Catholics to promote/support/vote against any evil. “VOTING/SUPPORTING/PROMOTING IS A MORAL ACT.” It involves duties and responsibilities. Our duty is to promote/support/vote in keeping with a conscience properly formed by fundamental moral principles (from "Moral Principles for Catholic Voters" issued by Kansas Catholic bishops). It is important to remember, however, that it is possible for our conscience to be certain and at the same time incorrect about what is good and evil. For this reason, we have an equally serious duty to properly form or teach our conscience so that it can correctly judge what is good and evil. We are obliged to seek the truth and then to abide by it (from "Moral Principles for Catholic Voters").

There are specific actions that are intrinsically evil by their very nature or their essence and must never be promoted/supported/voted into law because they directly violate the very life and dignity of the human person. At the top of this list are the five intrinsic moral evils: “Abortion, Euthanasia, Embryonic Stem Cell Research, Human Cloning, and Homosexual Marriage.”

Making Your Decision

1.) For each office, first determine how each candidate/politician with a real—even if unlikely—chance of winning stands on each issue that will come before him and involves nonnegotiable moral principles.

2.) Rank the candidates/politicians according to how well their positions align with these nonnegotiable moral principles.

3.) Even if these candidates/politicians support the poor and health care, give preference to candidates/politicians who do not endorse and support/promote/vote for the five intrinsic moral evils.

4.) Where every candidate/politician endorses positions contrary to non-negotiable principles, choose the candidate/politician likely to do the least harm.

When there is no choice of a candidate(s)/politician(s) that avoids supporting/promoting/voting intrinsically evil actions which include “Abortion, Euthanasia, Embryonic Stem Cell Research, Human Cloning, and Homosexual Marriage,” we, as Catholics, are morally obligated not to support/promote/vote that candidate/politician. “Concerning choices that are intrinsically evil, Catholics may not support/promote/vote or even remain indifferent to them” ("Moral Principles for Catholic Voters”).

As we look at the political eligious landscape of our society today, President Obama, V.P. Biden, Nancy Pelosi, Ted Kennedy, cardinals, bishops, priests, nuns, and our faithful who promote/support/vote or even remain indifferent to these five intrinsic moral evils are wrong and are against GOD. We must voice our disdain for any candidates/politicians, shepherds of our church, and even our faithful who believe in promoting these evils. These are non-negotiable principles, and as Catholics, we may not promote/support/vote or even remain indifferent to them.

In this same spirit, it is a mockery of God and against our teachings to have a public Mass for candidates/politicians who promote/support/vote any or all of the five intrinsic moral evils. Where are our shepherds and/or our faithful and our disdain for the mockery of God and the Church that He built?

God, please help us to remain faithfully to your word/truth. Amen.

BFG of CA 1:01PM September 10, 2009

God’s family is divided: Majority to Obama – less to Word.

The Shepherds and the flock can tell when division exists causing diversion within the flock’s ranks with individuals being drawn to their differing desires and beliefs. This shows the worst of moral value difficulties that can occur within the (flock) family members. A great shepherd could arrive to assert and substantiate the true direction of Gods ‘truth’ for all members, gathering together total and complete acceptance within the family, whereupon they are focused to remove this occurring evil, allowing the family’s continuance unto faithful obedience to God. Does America deserve such blessings at this time? There are shepherds, yet each one of us is called to shepherd, to take a stand and commit to do the will of God. Shepherds know if their flock is acting in the right direction. If the shepherd is not directing the flock in the right direction and this must be happening now, because our shepherds are on all sides of this calamity, they are not on the same page, displaying a concerning ‘shepherd’ problem! This makes it impossible for the flock, not being properly lead, without a shepherd, demanding that each member must have his conscience, faith and moral fiber in order to commit and decide the proper Godly direction to chose. Hence shepherds and sheep are joining into this wrongful array, attempting to either show what side they support or to faithfully display their beliefs, which they feel in obedience to God, concerning these most significant moral issues. Considering the serious, evil wickedness of these events, this could be the most disastrous and destructive event in the history of America. This news offers only one view or exposure of the total calamity facing our times. This suggests the removal of morality and God, which historically occurs under such governments.

R Patrrick Gilson of CA 1:26PM September 07, 2009

God & Country

Dan Gilgoff covers religion for U.S. News & World Report. He is the author of The Jesus Machine: How James Dobson, Focus on the Family, and Evangelical America are Winning the Culture War, and is a former politics editor at beliefnet. E-mail Dan at godandcountry@usnews.com.

advertisement