Does the American Psychological Association Want Gays to Switch Churches?

August 21, 2009 RSS Feed Print

Warren Throckmorton is associate professor of psychology at Grove City College. He is the coauthor of the Sexual Identity Therapy Framework and writes a daily blog. While Dan's away, we've asked a selection of prominent guest bloggers from a variety of perspectives to give their thoughts on religion and public life.

Earlier this month, the American Psychological Association released a task force report that provides guidance to psychologists about how they should respond to clients who have moral distress over being gay or bisexual. Most of these conflicts, the panel found, were religious in nature and lead some people to seek therapies that attempt to reorient homosexual attractions to heterosexuality. Regarding these change efforts, the APA task force reported that "there is insufficient evidence to support the use of psychological interventions to change sexual orientation." On that basis, the APA recommended that therapists should "avoid telling clients they can change from gay to straight."

What, then, can therapists do? The APA report gives copious guidance on working with religious same-sex attracted people who believe homosexual behavior violates their faith. Some such persons might remain in a like-minded church, while others might leave for a gay-affirming church. However, does the APA report encourage therapists to push people to change churches?

Apparently, some religious conservatives believe so. A news report from OneNewsNow, the information arm of the American Family Association, said the APA report "suggests that if a person with same-gender attractions has problems because of their religious beliefs, they should just change churches." About the APA report, David Pruden, spokesperson for the National Association for the Research and Therapy of Homosexuality and executive director of Evergreen International, a ministry to homosexuals of the LDS Church, told OneNewsNow:

"The suggestion was as a Christian, when your conscience comes in conflict with what's going on in your life—temptations, attractions, concerns, whatever they happen to be—that what you simply do is jettison your standards so that it becomes easier to live with your temptations."

Both OneNewsNow and Mr. Pruden stand by their statements. But is it accurate to say that the APA report advises that conflicted people switch churches or "jettison" beliefs?

Not at all, says Rhea Farberman, a spokesperson for the APA. When I asked her if the APA recommends that same-sex attracted people switch churches to resolve their conflicts, she told me that ". . . the APA is not recommending a particular, one size will fit all outcome. To the contrary, the report emphasizes that therapy should be client-centered; different clients will have different priorities and therefore different goals for the therapy.

"The report does not recommend that people 'change churches.' The report advises that gay and lesbian people for whom religion is important should investigate all of their spiritual options."

So how did the idea that the APA recommended a church swap get started? One possible source for this impression is the initial Associated Press story by David Crary. Many newspapers and websites carried the abbreviated version of Crary's article, which began by saying psychologists shouldn't tell people they can change orientation, followed by:

"Instead, psychologists should tell patients that if their religion and sexual orientation conflict, they should consider options such as celibacy or switching churches."

In the print version of the story in the August 6 edition of USA Today, the story ends there. The way the AP article reads, one could get the impression that the APA was advising therapists to direct clients toward a certain type of church.

In any case, a careful reading of the APA report does not lead to the conclusion that psychologists should advise clients to change their religion or give up beliefs in the face of conflicts over sexuality. This misconception is unfortunate, since some religious readers are deeply distrustful of the mental health professions already.

In fact, the APA report demonstrates respect for a variety of religious outcomes. For instance, the APA report said that people found benefit in both gay-affirming and nonaffirming support groups. On page 48, the task force wrote:

"Increasing social support through psychotherapy, self-help groups, or welcoming communities (ethnic communities, social groups, religious denominations) may relieve some distress. For instance, participants reported benefits from mutual support groups, both sexual-minority affirming and ex-gay [nonaffirming] groups."

The task force report did not recommend that clients abandon their beliefs. In the executive summary, various outcomes are envisioned:

". . . [A]n affirmative approach is supportive of clients' identity development without an a priori treatment goal concerning how clients identify or live out their sexual orientation or spiritual beliefs. This type of therapy can provide a safe space where the different aspects of the evolving self can be acknowledged, explored, and respected and potentially rewoven into a more coherent sense of self that feels authentic to the client, and it can be helpful to those who accept, reject, or are ambivalent about their same-sex attractions."

The APA recognizes that some people will accept, reject or remain conflicted about homosexual urges. Therapists are encouraged to respect the reality of both sexual desire and religious commitments in working out individual answers.

Tags:
religion,
gay rights

Reader Comments Read all comments (33)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

I`m a psychologist and I can tell that a homosexuality is a mental disorder. Every well educated psychologist or psychiatrist know it. And I know the reason they don`t tell that it is true, but it`s true. Homosexuality is changeable.

Katherine of CA 7:54PM June 27, 2010

Literal interpretation of Scripture is more in line with Christianity's belief of absolutes. Liberal readings and translations of the Bible allow for personal beliefs to become more authoritative than the Word of God that was divinely inspired by God Himself. Jude is considered canon and therefore part of God's Scriptures. To question otherwise is to question if God is able to prevent His Words from being corrupted, which is an entirely different subject. Homosexuality is considered an abomination and Sodom is best known for this.

If we must throw out the Old Law on the account that it offends homosexuals, let's throw everything out: condemnations on lying, adultery, those annoying parts about pride and idolatry, etc.

Biblically, sex was intended for married couples to continue on the human race. No where do we find that sex was meant for anything else. Marriage is about one man and one woman the intimate union between the two. If God in His omniscience knew that there would be such a debate about this, wouldn't He have included a homosexual account that He approved of in the Bible? Yet this is not found at all. Instead we verses condemning homosexuality along with other things like heterosexual sins.

Dr. Shade of NC 10:15PM August 27, 2009

It is interesting to read the comments. My blog post documented that the APA report does not promote leaving church if one is same-sex attracted. Yet several commenters (e.g., kgdmwork, aes7878) continue to react as if the APA guides people to change churches. The APA also acknowledges that same-sex attracted may clearly choose celibacy from homosexual behavior. The APA report did not condemn those people. Some conservative groups are confusing the matter and building on pre-existing distrust of the APA. I urge readers to re-read the post and if interested view the APA report: http://www.apa.org/pi/lgbc/publications/therapeutic-response.pdf

Warren Throckmorton of PA 8:20AM August 27, 2009

God & Country

U.S. News Weekly

Subscribe Now!

Order the new U.S. News Weekly digital magazine at a special low introductory price!

Dan Gilgoff covers religion for U.S. News & World Report. He is the author of The Jesus Machine: How James Dobson, Focus on the Family, and Evangelical America are Winning the Culture War, and is a former politics editor at beliefnet. E-mail Dan at godandcountry@usnews.com.

Is increasing access to healthcare a moral or faith-based cause?

View Results

Follow Dan Gilgoff on: Facebook | Twitter | MySpace

Photo Gallery

Faith Photo of the Day

See what's going on in the faith world across the globe every day.

SPECIAL REPORTS

Secrets of Islam

A guide to the world's fastest growing religion.

Sacred Places

Explore the significance, history, and enduring power of places people consider most sacred.

Women of the Bible

The "daughters of Eve" play many roles in the Old and New Testaments.