Does Obama's Healthcare Plan Fund Abortion? Take 5

August 5, 2009 RSS Feed Print

By Dan Gilgoff, God & Country

Rep. Lois Capps's office calls to point out that the Capps amendment to the House healthcare bill isn't silent on how abortion would be funded in the public health insurance option, as I wrote yesterday, but that it prohibits federal money from funding such abortions because the public option must abide by the same rules as the private plans offered through the proposed health insurance exchange. So the debate over whether the government funds abortion through the healthcare bill is over whether the Capps amendment really uses premiums paid by individuals—as opposed to federal funds—to pay for abortion.

Douglas Johnson, legislative director for the National Right to Life Committee, calls the Capps amendment's segregation-of-funds clause a "bookkeeping sham" because money from the government, individuals, and employers effectively goes into the same pot to finance health insurance benefits. But Democrats note that the amendment stipulates that government "affordability credits are not used for purposes of paying for [abortion] services" that are prohibited under the Hyde Amendment, which bars Medicaid from using federal funds for abortion except in limited circumstances.

Should congressional Democrats decline to reauthorize Hyde amendment—which must be voted on each year with the appropriations bill for the Health and Human Services Department—the Capps amendment stipulates that federal funds could finance abortion. But President Obama's 2010 budget left the Hyde Amendment in place. And Democrats say a fight over the Hyde Amendment, and abortion, should be separate from the debate over a healthcare bill.

Tags:
abortion,
healthcare reform,
religion,
healthcare

Reader Comments Read all comments (35)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

I completely understand all pro-life statements; however put yourself into the shoes of a woman undergoing this difficult decision.

Think of the young girls who make a mistake and are advised by their own parents to "take care of it" or the child will be kicked out of the house. If this young girl cannot receive the health care she deseves she will have to live a life on the streets, and possibly taking extreme measres to kill her baby.

Think of the girls that are rapped and become pregnate with that man's child. Should she be forced to carry her attacker's baby and relive that moment for the rest of her life.

As always adoption is a valid choice, however the girls who do not want their children, who are forced to hide what is happening to their bodies, and who are ashamed to admit what they have done will not take care of themselves or their baby. They could partake in drinking, drugs, or self inflicted abuse in hopes to end their wrongdoing. Usually these acts do not kill a baby, bt render them disabled or addicted at birth.

I want everyone who is pro-life to stop the judgement. No person can know what pressure is being placed on the girl or the thoughts she has to endure the rest of her life. For those that believe that more young girls are engaging in sex now that ever need to only watch Dirty Dancing. Just because it was not talked abot does not mean it did not happen. The young adults today do not have the same taboo when it comes to sex, which has lead to birth control being used more often and widely avaliable at any age.

Think N Speak of FL 10:40PM April 16, 2010

I do not believe that this health care plan is supporting or paying for Abortions. The losers of this bill are the Insurance companies and the Drug companies who charge 400.00 for one medication to people who can't afford to pay. While Insurance companies deny AMERICANS the right to doctors and information that will help. I DO NOT BELIEVE IN ABORTION, but I know that this bill will help to inform young people about forms of birth control that will prevent them from becoming pregnant in the first place. The information will be available at the doctors office to help prevent any medical problems. We must pass this bill for the good of the nation. Americans need to have available Health Care.

Mssvett of TN 11:40AM March 21, 2010

The insurance companies and drug companies need to be regulated. Since this has not happened in the pass, we have no choice but to pass this health care plan. In America we pass bills for Americans and over time we amend the bills to better the lives of the people. We can't fix everything on the first signing, but we must start somewhere. In our history we add or take away what is necessary for Americans to continue to live as respectful humans. Right now in America there is a horrible problem with health care and we must make major change.

Mssvett of TN 11:26AM March 21, 2010

God & Country

U.S. News Weekly

Subscribe Now!

Order the new U.S. News Weekly digital magazine at a special low introductory price!

Dan Gilgoff covers religion for U.S. News & World Report. He is the author of The Jesus Machine: How James Dobson, Focus on the Family, and Evangelical America are Winning the Culture War, and is a former politics editor at beliefnet. E-mail Dan at godandcountry@usnews.com.

Is increasing access to healthcare a moral or faith-based cause?

View Results

Follow Dan Gilgoff on: Facebook | Twitter | MySpace

Photo Gallery

Faith Photo of the Day

See what's going on in the faith world across the globe every day.

SPECIAL REPORTS

Secrets of Islam

A guide to the world's fastest growing religion.

Sacred Places

Explore the significance, history, and enduring power of places people consider most sacred.

Women of the Bible

The "daughters of Eve" play many roles in the Old and New Testaments.