Democratic Bill Could Be a Preview of Obama's Abortion Plan

July 23, 2009 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (12)

Democratic Reps. Tim Ryan and Rosa DeLauro reintroduced their bill aimed at preventing unintended pregnancies and "reducing the need for abortion" today. This is big news because moderate to liberal faith-based advocates are urging the White House to adopt the bill—the Preventing Unintended Pregnancies, Reducing the Need for Abortion, and Supporting Parents Act—as the core of its forthcoming "common ground" plan on abortion and reproductive health.

Conservative religious groups, including the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops and the Southern Baptist Convention, have warned the White House that the Ryan-DeLauro bill is a deal breaker for them, since the bill funds contraception and comprehensive sex education. As I've written here, those groups have urged the administration to decouple the contraception and sex education parts of the plan from the abortion reduction part and get behind two separate bills that divide up the goals.

The White House has refused to say which way it's leaning. But in recent weeks, lots of religious figures and groups close to the White House have expressed support for Ryan and DeLauro, suggesting that that might be the course the administration is inclined to take. This is just a hunch.

But the folks who've recently come out for Ryan-DeLauro include White House buds Rev. Joel Hunter, Rev. Jim Wallis, and Faith in Public Life, not to mention abortion rights groups like NARAL and Planned Parenthood and the left-leaning policy group Third Way, which drafted the bill.

The administration could buck this crowd and get behind Sen. Bob Casey's Pregnant Women Support Act—which is generally considered more robust on reducing demand for abortion and which leaves out contraceptive funding—but that would be a pretty big surprise.

Corrected on 08/03/09:An earlier version of this article [0723godcountry2] misstated the role that the think tank Third Way played in promoting the Preventing Unintended Pregnancies, Reducing the Need for Abortion, and Supporting Parents Act. The group drafted the bill.

Tags:
abortion,
religion

Reader Comments Read all comments (12)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

seeding air assumptions contends paper

barbikline of IL 9:59AM August 02, 2009

The previous commentor said, "With all of the population pressure on the environment, it's silly for people to oppose sex education and contraception. This is not the fifth century. If these people are really pro-life they should be concerned with the well being of people who are living now."

This thinking is flawed. 1) The innocent little lives taken daily as a result of abortion use so much less resources than most of the 'people who are living now.' One could justify the similar thought in the other direction more so I believe. Since those 'who are living now' have had a chance to live, why not allow the babies to be born and remove the male who conceived the baby? 2) Were there environmental issues in the fifth century? Was there sex education at this time? Was there contraception? Whatever those in the fifth century lacked was more than likely due to ignorance. Probably unintentional? They did not have the systems we have today to control their sewage for example, so it ran in the streets. They lacked information to make appropriate responsible choices. The previous opinion writer is impossing a willful ignorance. 3)The children aren't the 'guilty' ones here. 4) And, one who is 'pro-life' could not ethically choose life for one and death for the other. That choice will have to be left up to those who are 'pro-death.'

How about if those who choose to engage in sexual relationships start taking responsibility for their actions? Now there's an idea.

Steven Gregory of MO 10:34PM July 27, 2009

Many teens and women need help and there is help. We want women to get the support they need. We want women to get the love they need. We want people to have someone to talk to and help them when they are pregnant. Please share the truth and whole truth with them.

There are many places that are willing to help them during tough times. Being pregnant is a tough time for every women and they need all the support they can get. That support is available at many websites and organizations.

Share the truth of where they can get the help: http://www.nurturingnetwork.org/clientpacket.html

Love the Mother and the Child.

Share the Truth and Love

ComPassion of IN 11:53AM July 25, 2009

God & Country

Dan Gilgoff covers religion for U.S. News & World Report. He is the author of The Jesus Machine: How James Dobson, Focus on the Family, and Evangelical America are Winning the Culture War, and is a former politics editor at beliefnet. E-mail Dan at godandcountry@usnews.com.

advertisement